No, it wasn't. It was 34 counts of beating Hillary.
"AP’s review of nearly 150 reported cases since New York’s “repeated fraud” statute was passed in 1956 showed that nearly every previous time a company was taken away, victims and losses were key factors. Customers had lost money or bought defective products or never received services ordered, leaving them cheated and angry."
AP’s review of nearly 150 cases since New York’s “repeated fraud” statute was passed showed that nearly every previous time a company was taken away, victims and losses were key factors.
apnews.com
However, in this case, NOBODY lost money. Everyone Trump borrowed from was paid in full, were happy, and testified as such if they were even allowed to. Oh yea, even the banks said they couldn't prove if they lost a dime because Trump inflated his net worth.
"And though the bank offered Trump lower interest rates because he had agreed to personally guarantee the loans with his own money, it’s not clear how much better the rates were because of the inflated figures.
The bank never complained, and it’s unclear how much it lost, if anything. Bank officials called to testify couldn’t say for sure if Trump’s personal statement of worth had any impact on the rates."
They were at worst accounting errors. Period.
It was all ridiculous made up garbage.