Why Not Cancel Karl Marx

[anynameyouwish]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

go ahead

as a freedom loving constitution loving progressive liberal patriot who hates ALL authoritarians, fascists, commies, nazis, theocrats and pieces of crap I have NO fondness for Marx.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

I see....

so you actually LIKE authoritarians, fascists, commies, nazis, theocrats and pieces of crap ?

I guess that is why you admire trump

 

[Doc7505]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

You think China proves marx was wrong?

Have you seen their GDP growth?

I'll tell you guys a secret, no nation in history has risen without a mixed economy. 100% of developed nations were basically mercantilist* as they rose.

*mind blown*

Only exception to that I can think of is Korea. Who we built up in a very direct manner

Marx acolytes has gotten a lot more right than those with slavish devotion to markets have.

~~~~~~
Their successes in the economy have been subsidized by presidents like Carter, Clinton and especially Barack Hussein Obama with his Trans Pacific Partnership.

Deng Xiaoping and Jimmy Carter sign accords | January 29, 1979 | HISTORY

On January 29, 1979, Deng Xiaoping, deputy premier of China, meets President Jimmy Carter, and together they sign historic new accords that reverse decades of U.S. opposition to the People’s Republic of China. Deng Xiaoping lived out a full and complete transformation of China. The son of a...

www.history.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Lest We Forget Chinagate, The Most Serious Scandal in US History - www.independentsentinel.com

The “Chinagate” fundraising scandal plagued the 1996 Bill Clinton-Al Gore campaign and Hillary was very much involved. Chinagate aka Commercegate is the most serious scandal in U.S. history. It involves the transfer of America’s most sensitive technology, including but not limited to nuclear...

www.independentsentinel.com

.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology

With all this talk of Russians allegedly interfering in U.S. elections, it is worth recalling that it wasn’t too long ago that the previous Democrat in the White House betrayed America by working hand in hand with our Communist enemies…

capitalresearch.org

XXXXXXXXXXX​

U.S. Will Allow Computer Sale To Court China (Published 1993)

www.nytimes.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

https://www.americanfreedombybarbara.com/2020/05/usa-granted-china-most-favored-nation.html

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Joe Biden Is China’s Choice for President

The Democratic Party has always been weak on national security when it comes to China. But some credit is due when it comes to China’s atrocious human-rights record and its theft of American jobs. For a generation, prominent Democrats loudly criticized Beijing on these fronts, well before Donald...

news.yahoo.com

Subsidized? lol

You're for open markets they needed no subsidy, just opportunity ensures we would subsidize it

You're speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

You talk up markets then act like we shouldn't trade with teh chinese? Real capitalists think we should have open borders and no tariffs you retard

The marxist will tell you that a command economy to hurt your enemies is perfectly acceptable. THere is no such thought if you're for free markets. Let the market decide who you trade with.

WHOOOOOOOSH

Wanna be nationalists lol

So pathetic

You low born ***** woudln't know the first thing about running a nation. You think the chamber of commerce supports trump and his tariffs? lol

Clinton signing off on NAFTA converting manufacturing America into a service oriented nation right in the middle of of the computer boom.

https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/naftas-impact-u-s-economy-facts/

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

NAFTA at 25: 5M American Manufacturing Jobs Lost, Flat U.S. Wages

As NAFTA turns 25, American manufacturing jobs and wages tryi to come back after more than a decade of massive layoffs and stagnant pay.

www.breitbart.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Bill Clinton's True Legacy: Outsourcer-in-Chief

Mitt Romney may have run a company that outsourced jobs but Clinton ran a country that did.

www.huffpost.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

The Death of American Manufacturing

Globalization and outsourcing are hammering our icons of industry.

www.thetrumpet.com

 

[Doc7505]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

~~~~~~~
Then like Stalin his statues and effigies should be toppled and taken down....

 

[badbob85037]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

It will be.

 

[badbob85037]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

You think China proves marx was wrong?

Have you seen their GDP growth?

I'll tell you guys a secret, no nation in history has risen without a mixed economy. 100% of developed nations were basically mercantilist* as they rose.

*mind blown*

Only exception to that I can think of is Korea. Who we built up in a very direct manner

Marx acolytes has gotten a lot more right than those with slavish devotion to markets have.

~~~~~~
Their successes in the economy have been subsidized by presidents like Carter, Clinton and especially Barack Hussein Obama with his Trans Pacific Partnership.

Deng Xiaoping and Jimmy Carter sign accords | January 29, 1979 | HISTORY

On January 29, 1979, Deng Xiaoping, deputy premier of China, meets President Jimmy Carter, and together they sign historic new accords that reverse decades of U.S. opposition to the People’s Republic of China. Deng Xiaoping lived out a full and complete transformation of China. The son of a...

www.history.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Lest We Forget Chinagate, The Most Serious Scandal in US History - www.independentsentinel.com

The “Chinagate” fundraising scandal plagued the 1996 Bill Clinton-Al Gore campaign and Hillary was very much involved. Chinagate aka Commercegate is the most serious scandal in U.S. history. It involves the transfer of America’s most sensitive technology, including but not limited to nuclear...

www.independentsentinel.com

.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology

With all this talk of Russians allegedly interfering in U.S. elections, it is worth recalling that it wasn’t too long ago that the previous Democrat in the White House betrayed America by working hand in hand with our Communist enemies…

capitalresearch.org

XXXXXXXXXXX​

U.S. Will Allow Computer Sale To Court China (Published 1993)

www.nytimes.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

https://www.americanfreedombybarbara.com/2020/05/usa-granted-china-most-favored-nation.html

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Joe Biden Is China’s Choice for President

The Democratic Party has always been weak on national security when it comes to China. But some credit is due when it comes to China’s atrocious human-rights record and its theft of American jobs. For a generation, prominent Democrats loudly criticized Beijing on these fronts, well before Donald...

news.yahoo.com

Subsidized? lol

You're for open markets they needed no subsidy, just opportunity ensures we would subsidize it

You're speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

You talk up markets then act like we shouldn't trade with teh chinese? Real capitalists think we should have open borders and no tariffs you retard

The marxist will tell you that a command economy to hurt your enemies is perfectly acceptable. THere is no such thought if you're for free markets. Let the market decide who you trade with.

WHOOOOOOOSH

Wanna be nationalists lol

So pathetic

You low born ***** woudln't know the first thing about running a nation. You think the chamber of commerce supports trump and his tariffs? lol

Clinton signing off on NAFTA converting manufacturing America into a service oriented nation right in the middle of of the computer boom.

https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/naftas-impact-u-s-economy-facts/

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

NAFTA at 25: 5M American Manufacturing Jobs Lost, Flat U.S. Wages

As NAFTA turns 25, American manufacturing jobs and wages tryi to come back after more than a decade of massive layoffs and stagnant pay.

www.breitbart.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Bill Clinton's True Legacy: Outsourcer-in-Chief

Mitt Romney may have run a company that outsourced jobs but Clinton ran a country that did.

www.huffpost.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

The Death of American Manufacturing

Globalization and outsourcing are hammering our icons of industry.

www.thetrumpet.com

They say clinton balanced the budget but never tell how. Allow me, he cut our military to the quick. 260 surface ships, 4 nuclear submarines with their nuclear missiles and hundreds of war heads, 900,000 reserve troops, 200,000 active duty troops, 20 air force and navel air wings, 2,000 fighter aircraft, and over 290 bombers. our troops didn't have the ammunition to train with. What was left he loaned out to the communist UN. He gave 11 million pages of our nuclear secrets to China. The next time China takes a rocket and knocks another rocket out of the sky or aircraft carrier out of the water you can also thank clinton for that too. As before clinton China couldn't get a rocket off the ground. I thought we hung traitors. but one party re-elects them and cheer them on. There were more of China's spies living in the White House than in China and Bill laughs all the way to the bank while America was more concerned about the stain on the blue dress. His last act he sold pardons to some of the worst criminals of the decade

Hillary took over just where Bill left off only now it was Russia. There was no part of America that wasn't for sale. Just give her private server a ring and make an offer, Stupid dumberthandirtacrats

 

[danielpalos]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Why do you believe the left has any more affinity to Marx than the right does for Lincoln. Just right wing propaganda and rhetoric for divisiveness not cohesion.

 

[Moonglow]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

So are George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and they have had their statues pulled down by the feral Commie Mob, but of course the V.I. Lenin statue in Seattle remains and CRUCIALLY Karl Marx's GRAVE in London remains unmolested.

I am guessing that Lenin and Marx were not slave owners.

 

[22lcidw]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

So are George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and they have had their statues pulled down by the feral Commie Mob, but of course the V.I. Lenin statue in Seattle remains and CRUCIALLY Karl Marx's GRAVE in London remains unmolested.

I am guessing that Lenin and Marx were not slave owners.

Lenin And Marx did not write up a document that there are so few of. A document that was not going to pass without the slavery issue. Russians suffered. Near 60 million killed in a 15 year period alone.

 

[Moonglow]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

You think China proves marx was wrong?

Have you seen their GDP growth?

I'll tell you guys a secret, no nation in history has risen without a mixed economy. 100% of developed nations were basically mercantilist* as they rose.

*mind blown*

Only exception to that I can think of is Korea. Who we built up in a very direct manner

Marx acolytes has gotten a lot more right than those with slavish devotion to markets have.

~~~~~~
Their successes in the economy have been subsidized by presidents like Carter, Clinton and especially Barack Hussein Obama with his Trans Pacific Partnership.

Deng Xiaoping and Jimmy Carter sign accords | January 29, 1979 | HISTORY

On January 29, 1979, Deng Xiaoping, deputy premier of China, meets President Jimmy Carter, and together they sign historic new accords that reverse decades of U.S. opposition to the People’s Republic of China. Deng Xiaoping lived out a full and complete transformation of China. The son of a...

www.history.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Lest We Forget Chinagate, The Most Serious Scandal in US History - www.independentsentinel.com

The “Chinagate” fundraising scandal plagued the 1996 Bill Clinton-Al Gore campaign and Hillary was very much involved. Chinagate aka Commercegate is the most serious scandal in U.S. history. It involves the transfer of America’s most sensitive technology, including but not limited to nuclear...

www.independentsentinel.com

.

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Flashback: Bill Clinton gave China missile technology

With all this talk of Russians allegedly interfering in U.S. elections, it is worth recalling that it wasn’t too long ago that the previous Democrat in the White House betrayed America by working hand in hand with our Communist enemies…

capitalresearch.org

XXXXXXXXXXX​

U.S. Will Allow Computer Sale To Court China (Published 1993)

www.nytimes.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

https://www.americanfreedombybarbara.com/2020/05/usa-granted-china-most-favored-nation.html

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Joe Biden Is China’s Choice for President

The Democratic Party has always been weak on national security when it comes to China. But some credit is due when it comes to China’s atrocious human-rights record and its theft of American jobs. For a generation, prominent Democrats loudly criticized Beijing on these fronts, well before Donald...

news.yahoo.com

Subsidized? lol

You're for open markets they needed no subsidy, just opportunity ensures we would subsidize it

You're speaking out of both sides of your mouth.

You talk up markets then act like we shouldn't trade with teh chinese? Real capitalists think we should have open borders and no tariffs you retard

The marxist will tell you that a command economy to hurt your enemies is perfectly acceptable. THere is no such thought if you're for free markets. Let the market decide who you trade with.

WHOOOOOOOSH

Wanna be nationalists lol

So pathetic

You low born ***** woudln't know the first thing about running a nation. You think the chamber of commerce supports trump and his tariffs? lol

Clinton signing off on NAFTA converting manufacturing America into a service oriented nation right in the middle of of the computer boom.

https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/naftas-impact-u-s-economy-facts/

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

NAFTA at 25: 5M American Manufacturing Jobs Lost, Flat U.S. Wages

As NAFTA turns 25, American manufacturing jobs and wages tryi to come back after more than a decade of massive layoffs and stagnant pay.

www.breitbart.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Bill Clinton's True Legacy: Outsourcer-in-Chief

Mitt Romney may have run a company that outsourced jobs but Clinton ran a country that did.

www.huffpost.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

The Death of American Manufacturing

Globalization and outsourcing are hammering our icons of industry.

www.thetrumpet.com

They tried to pass it during Bush but there were too many Democrats that would not vote for it.

After much consideration and emotional discussion, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on November 17, 1993, 234–200. The agreement's supporters included 132 Republicans and 102 Democrats. The bill passed the Senate on November 20, 1993, 61–38. Senate supporters were 34 Republicans and 27 Democrats Republican Representative David Dreier of California, a strong proponent of NAFTA since the Reagan Administration, played a leading role in mobilizing support for the agreement among Republicans in Congress and across the country.

The trade agreement was begun in 1988 during Reagan, Reagan laid the groundwork for the treaty..
The impetus for a North American free trade zone began with U.S. president Ronald Reagan, who made the idea part of his campaign when he announced his candidacy for the presidency in November 1979.[15] Canada and the United States signed the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) in 1988, and shortly afterward Mexican President Carlos Salinas de Gortari decided to approach U.S. president George H. W. Bush to propose a similar agreement in an effort to bring in foreign investment following the Latin American debt crisis.[15] As the two leaders began negotiating, the Canadian government under Prime Minister Brian Mulroney feared that the advantages Canada had gained through the Canada–US FTA would be undermined by a US–Mexican bilateral agreement, and asked to become a party to the US–Mexican talks.

North American Free Trade Agreement - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

.
So, your half assed attempts to rewrite history to leave out any involvement of NAFTA with Republicans has been exposed and now we can see the truth, something you can't do...

 

[Moonglow]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

So are George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and they have had their statues pulled down by the feral Commie Mob, but of course the V.I. Lenin statue in Seattle remains and CRUCIALLY Karl Marx's GRAVE in London remains unmolested.

I am guessing that Lenin and Marx were not slave owners.

Lenin And Marx did not write up a document that there are so few of. A document that was not going to pass without the slavery issue. Russians suffered. Near 60 million killed in a 15 year period alone.

Which doesn't mean they were slave owners.

 

[Moonglow]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

~~~~~~~
Then like Stalin his statues and effigies should be toppled and taken down....

Get off yer ass and go for it or shut up. You seem to whine all day and refuse to get involved with your community to rid yourself of these people you hate.

 

[Moonglow]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

~~~~~~~
Then like Stalin his statues and effigies should be toppled and taken down....

Get off yer ass and go for it or shut up. You seem to whine all day and refuse to get involved with your community to rid yourself of these people you hate.

 

[dudmuck]

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx?
Racism and anti-Semitism were second nature to him, and yet the cancel culture gives him a free pass every time.​

Why Not Cancel Karl Marx? - The American Spectator | USA News and PoliticsThe American Spectator | USA News and Politics

In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of

spectator.org

18 Aug 2020 ~~ By Paul Kengor
In a cancel culture targeting everyone from Confederate to Union generals, Columbus to Winston Churchill, Francis Scott Key to even Abraham Lincoln and all of Mt. Rushmore, and where the racial statements and attitudes of every historical figure are scrutinized, it’s funny who gets a pass.
There are monuments to Marx in Europe, one just erected in 2018. In the United States, there’s a handsome profile of Marx carved in porcelain at one of the Smithsonian museums and a flowery painting at the Guggenheim. In 2018, for the bicentennial of his birth, one of America’s top colleges, Carnegie Mellon University, held a yearlong celebration of Marx, including an accompanying art exhibit dedicated to the man. And who knows how many busts of Marx sit in professors’ offices, safe from protesting college students with spray-cans.
Of course, the reality is that Marx gets a pass from the left because he’s of the left. Leftists ignore or try to separate him from the ideology bearing his name that helped produce over 100 million deaths in the 20th century alone. The dread “dead white European male” tag conveniently eludes Karl Marx, nor does he raise the needle on the Left’s bigotry meter. But alas, he should.
A 16-foot-tall bronzed Vladimir Lenin stands unscathed in liberal Seattle, and a new monument to the Bolshevik godfather just went up in Germany. Particularly curious, one wonders why Karl Marx goes untouched.
Karl Marx was, after all, a bigot. His attitude toward blacks and Jews alone (not to mention women) would stun Stonewall Jackson. Ugly racial-ethnic stereotypes by Marx are littered throughout his writings.
[Snip]
Much more could be said. This is far from a full testimony of Marx’s awful attitudes.
Remember: the Left’s standard for canceling a historical figure is bigotry. And really, it often takes only one offensive statement from an entire lifetime. That being the case, why hasn’t Karl Marx been canceled? Why aren’t angry mobs staging sit-ins outside professors’ doors insisting their busts of Marx be tossed to the ash-heap of history? Why do universities celebrate the man? And where’s Black Lives Matter on this one?
We know the answer. Karl Marx is an icon to the Left. Just like progressives’ calls for tolerance and diversity, their calls for canceling and removing are highly selective — or, more bluntly, highly hypocritical.


Comment:
Marx and his side kick Engels created a failed dystopian utopia in the minds of his acolytes even till the present day.
Factual proof of the total failure of this ideology has been proven time and again by Russia, China, Cuba, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and recently Venezuela.
Yet, it persists in America by the infiltration of Marxists educating our young. Saying they will get it right this time in America.
Look around at the death and destruction the Marxist Socialists have wrought so far this year in their Socialist Blue Plantation Sanctuary Cities.

Marx is dead already so he is already cancelled.

So are George Washington and Thomas Jefferson and they have had their statues pulled down by the feral Commie Mob, but of course the V.I. Lenin statue in Seattle remains and CRUCIALLY Karl Marx's GRAVE in London remains unmolested.

I am guessing that Lenin and Marx were not slave owners.

Lenin And Marx did not write up a document that there are so few of. A document that was not going to pass without the slavery issue. Russians suffered. Near 60 million killed in a 15 year period alone.

Karl Marx never met Lenin.

Marx moved to London and "remained there for the rest of his life". He died in 1883.

Karl Marx - Wikipedia

Lenin was born in 1870 in the Russian Empire. He did not leave home until 1887 when he went to Kazan University.

http://rt.com/Russia_Now/Russiapedia/Those_Russians/lvladimir-lenin--.html?fullstory

Additionally, In his most important work, Marx states that “Labour in a white skin cannot emancipate itself where it is branded in a black skin.”

 

[Moonglow]

Cancel culture represents envy, resentment and desire for endless free shit.

Karl Marx represents... envy, resentment and a life of free shit.

No it doesn't his life was like that free shit is unwanted unless it is used for fertilizer.