Why not be proactive against ISIS??

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Why wait till they have killed millions of us before we respond meaningfully? The piecemeal approach of the liberal Obama years has resulted in Paris.

 

[g5000]

I have been asking the right wing rubes for a very long time what we should do about ISIS. They invariably cowered and refused to answer. I think one person finally, finally, finally recently said what should be done, before the Paris attack. Another person gave a waffling non-response that we should be all in or all out.

The GOP Congress has cowered and refused to approve the AUMF against ISIS for over year.

See, any tard can attack the other guy's plan. It takes balls to suggest what else should be done.

The Right has become the weakest, most feeble-minded pack of parroting tards it has ever been. It isn't even a shadow of its former self. It's a shadow of a pants shitter guzzling a cup of piss.

 

[Moonglow]

The GOP led Congress has kicked out any type of plan Oblama has tried to get authorized.....To expand on ISIS..So who is sitting on who's hands?

 

[g5000]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.

 

[deltex1]

G0000 just squirted on her iPad.

 

[Avorysuds]

Nothing...

 

[g5000]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?

 

[g5000]

Does anyone support Herr Deltex's Final Solution?

They will not stop. Accept them at your peril. Or exterminate them...as we would have done before the rise of Libtards faggots.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

 

[BluesLegend]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?

You can also not defeat ISIS by sitting around with your thumb stuck up your ass like Obama has been doing. He's clearly just trying to run out the clock on his presidency doing as little as possible about the problem he has mismanaged.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?

dear, do you recall that Japan surrendered after an air strike???

 

[g5000]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

 

[g5000]

"Proactive against ISIS" means sending in at least 30,000 ground troops.

You have to be specific. So see if you can get the cowards to roger up on 30,000 troops now. And ask when they are enlisting.

dear, why troops when we can just eliminate Raqqa with missiles?? Also , several like Trump have said they will deploy troops.

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

So do you support sending in the minimum of 30,000 troops it will take or not?

You can also not defeat ISIS by sitting around with your thumb stuck up your ass like Obama has been doing. He's clearly just trying to run out the clock on his presidency doing as little as possible about the problem he has mismanaged.

So do you support sending in at least 30,000 troops to finish them off?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

dear the example I gave of a proactive response was to eliminate Raqqa.
Do you understand???

 

[g5000]

Notice how the cowards STILL won't commit to any plan other than that old standby, "Whatever Obama is doing, we are against that"?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So do you support sending in at least 30,000 troops to finish them off?

dear, we finished off Japan from the air. Do you recall??

 

[deltex1]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

They're making a million per day in oil sales.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Notice how the cowards STILL won't commit to any plan other than that old standby, "Whatever Obama is doing, we are against that"?

dear, plan is proactive elimination of Raqqa the capital of the Caliphate. Do you understand??

 

[g5000]

You cannot defeat ISIS from the air alone...dear.

dear, subject was not defeating them but rather reacting proactively to them. Do you understand.

Do you understand we have been bombing them and have shrunk their territory by at least a third?

So WTF do you mean by "reacting proactively" if what we have been doing is not enough but you don't want to defeat them?

Do you even have a clue what you are trying to say?

dear the example I gave of a proactive response was to eliminate Raqqa.
Do you understand???

You can't "eliminate Raqqa with missiles". It would either have to be nuked or bombed like Dresden in WWII.

Are you saying you want to wipe out the entire civilian population of a Syrian city? And you think this will make an impression on ISISBOOMBAH somehow?