Why Muslim states fail.

ShahdagMountains

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
9,128
Reaction score
8,273
Points
2,128
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

 
Look at all the shit Europeans went through creating the state and then the nation.
 
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

The reason the blasphemy laws are so crucial for the islamos is that their god(allah/used to be called alilah) that they worship(?) has had such a piss poor track record of success. If the islamos did not push the death sentence for non-believers the entire rotten islamo structure would implode into nothingness.
 
" Prostrating Face Down In Blind Obedience Before All Other Lofted Anuses "

* Ass Holier Than Thou Venerating An Amulet Of A Shiny Anus *


There is a genetic religion of qurayshism that applies for lineal descendants of ishmaelim within the city state of hejaz and there is a debase pretense that qurayshism applies outside of hejaz that is termed fictional ishmaelism .

The qurayn is a hate speech militant manifesto , with +1400 years of homicide by doctrine , against which all are entitled to self defense , and citizenship should not be extended to adherents of fictional ishmaelism .

One who submits to submission is orwellian , double think and double speak , stupidity and propaganda with a pretense that adherents be mindless drones .

The term muslim , meaning one who submits , and the term islam , meaning one who submits , are generic terms and one can practice islam in a bdsm dungeon by being a muslim to a dominatrix .

The garb of sectarian supremacist psychopaths is to institute prejudice and discrimination in the lands of dar al-harb .


The_Blackstone.jpg



 
Turkey is a secular country but is 99% Islamist.
 
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

Waiting for the atheists to do the inevitable broad brush in order to (falsely) cast Christianity the same way: "See? Theocracies fail!"
 
" Broad Brush Because Of Fake Expectations "

* Difference Between Directives By Doctrine *

Waiting for the atheists to do the inevitable broad brush in order to (falsely) cast Christianity the same way: "See? Theocracies fail!"
The christian ethos is based in antinomianism , which translates " by no name will a law be made " .

While purported adherents of christian doctrine have invoked justifications for wars and pogroms , the gospel does not include directives to conquer by the sword , whereas the qurayn explicitly does .

The founder of protestantism , martin luther , related that it is against christian doctrine to fight a war in its name , while leaders could fight wars to defend the sovereignty of their peoples , christianity was there to console those suffering from the tribulations .
 
" Ignoring Blame For Fundamentalism Of Terrorist Facilitators "

* Exploitative Hegemony Of The West Is Not The Entire Story *

IQ2 Abulhawa Opening Remarks

The woman claims that ba'athist sad dam brutalized his people , and similar claims are made of as sad , while ba'aathist government is secular and provides liberties of independence to women , such as attending university , etc ; however , instituting secular reforms among sun stroked psychopaths of fictional ishmaelism and having to suppress the constant uprising from its militant , combative , degenerates , is a condition all too easily referred to by the opposition as oppression .

The secular government of iraq was a thorn in the side of the psychopaths of saudis wahhabis , even though iraqi and syrian peoples being arabs and largely sunni , they were continually dealing with disgruntled shia populations - the abbasid revolution continues .

Ba'athism originated in the political thought of Syrian philosophers Michel Aflaq, Salah al-Din al-Bitar, and Zaki Arsuzi.[6] They are considered the founders of the ideology, despite forming different organizations. In the 1940s, Bitar and Aflaq co-founded the Ba'ath Party, while Arsuzi founded the Arab National Party and later the Arab Ba'ath.[6]

For example, Aflaq insisted on the overthrow of the old ruling classes and supported the creation of a secular society by separating Islam from the state.
 
Last edited:
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

If We Don't Have a Renaissance, We Will Have a Dark Ages

Self-determination for people determined to destroy civilization was an indication of the decadence of civilization's self-appointed "wise stewards."
 
Selflessly destroying Syrian military equipment and ammunition depots, Israel forgot not only about the fact that Ukrainian Nazis were greedily looking at all this good stuff, but also about the threat of the dreaded “Assad's chemical weapons”, which were used to scare gullible idiots.
 
Turkey is a secular country but is 99% Islamist.

No, Turks are Asiatic invaders who only pretended to be Moslem after the Mongols wiped out the Islamic leadership at Baghdad. They are not really Islamist at all.
 
The reason the blasphemy laws are so crucial for the islamos is that their god(allah/used to be called alilah) that they worship(?) has had such a piss poor track record of success. If the islamos did not push the death sentence for non-believers the entire rotten islamo structure would implode into nothingness.

That is silly because Islam totally tolerates all other religions, and has never harmed anyone over religion.
Allah is NOT the name of any god, but is the word "god" in Arabic.
It is obvious lots of religions lived peacefully in the Mideast over 1300 years when Islam was in control.
 
" Broad Brush Because Of Fake Expectations "

* Difference Between Directives By Doctrine *


The christian ethos is based in antinomianism , which translates " by no name will a law be made " .

While purported adherents of christian doctrine have invoked justifications for wars and pogroms , the gospel does not include directives to conquer by the sword , whereas the qurayn explicitly does .

The founder of protestantism , martin luther , related that it is against christian doctrine to fight a war in its name , while leaders could fight wars to defend the sovereignty of their peoples , christianity was there to console those suffering from the tribulations .

The Quran prohibits harming anyone else except in defense.
Mohammed never invaded anywhere, and was just concerned with stopping the horrific Byzantine imperialism over the Mideast.
 
" Celebrating The End Of Ram A Dan Means Going Back To The Abode Of War "

* Clue Less Public Full Of Conditioned Ignorance *

The Quran prohibits harming anyone else except in defense.
Mohammed never invaded anywhere, and was just concerned with stopping the horrific Byzantine imperialism over the Mideast.
Your statement that the qurayn prohibits harming anyone else except in self defense is an absolute falsehood , a damned deceitful lie in many cases and a statement of blathering ignorance in most cases .

The conjecture comes from surah 2 and self defense applies only in the " sacred months " when a temporary and self imposed armistice is expected ; however , when the " sacred months " are over then surah 9 prevails .

The surah 9 was written 113th out of 114 in chronology and it is a hate speech , sectarian supremacist , militant manifesto with +1400 years of homicide by doctrine to prove it , and note that zakah is tithing for converts while jizyah is a tax on the dhimmi ( dimmunition - lesser class ) .

The directives in the qurayn to conquer by the sword to manifest its religious polity over all other religion cannot be extricated from its doctrine , and an expectation that qurayshism applies universally outside the scope of hejaz entitles any and all to self defense against fictional ishmaelism that particularly includes not extending citizenship to its adherents .

The contemporary public narrative identifies nazi insignia with supremacists and expects a spontaneous freak out , but contemporary public narrative does not associate the sectarian garb of fictional ishmaelism with edicts and tenets of creed and final solution aspirations for sectarian supremacy and subjugation of non believers .

2:194. [Fighting in] the sacred month is for [aggression committed in] the sacred month, and for [all] violations is legal retribution. So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you. And fear God and know that God is with those who fear Him.

9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakāh, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, God is Forgiving and Merciful.

9:29 Fight those who do not believe in God or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what God and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

9:123 O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that God is with the righteous.



- dar al-harb is on the back burner for now .

The author of the quran named surah 47 after himself and in its might makes rite klingon mind set , the final solution is included :

47:4. So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if God had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of God - never will He waste their deeds.

47:11 That is because God is the protector of those who have believed and because the disbelievers have no protector.

47:35 So do not weaken and call for peace while you are superior; and God is with you and will never deprive you of [the reward of] your deeds.



 
Last edited:
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

Duh

It’s
In the title

Pretty obvious
 
In Europe, when a dictator quits, civilisation takes over & state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world.

This was written in 2011. Still holds true today?​

States released from colonial rule in the 20th century have by and large not done well. Today, most of them are either failing or failed states. Only a few have reached the finishing line of liberal democracy with a survivable economic model beyond the 21st century. Most of the Muslim states are included in the failing postcolonial model. Dictators with mental bipolar disorder — historically mistaken for charisma — who aimed to achieve romantic goals have crumbled, leaving in their wake equally romantic mobs of youths demanding what they presume is liberal democracy.

After Saddam Hussein, Iraq is in disarray; after Hosni Mubarak, Egypt is teetering; Libya promises nothing better. And after Musharraf, Pakistan’s democracy is dysfunctional. Among Muslims, only the market state in the Gulf may survive. In the Far East, too, it is the market state that looks like marching on. Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia may survive if they don’t exterminate their entrepreneur Chinese minorities under the spur of Islam. In Europe, when the dictator quits, civilisation takes over and the state survives. No such thing happens in the Muslim world. The premodern seduction of the Muslim mind prevents return to democracy. The blasphemy law is more powerful than any democratic constitution.

Dictators are charismatic.

Because of islamofacism bigotry against the other
 
There are 49 countries on earth where Muslims are the majority. Why do they need to come to a country where Christianity has been practiced for longer than Islam has existed?
 
Back
Top Bottom