Why Liberals Hate America

[fuzzykitten99]

LMAO .... yeah ......the Republicans cheated, and my all-time favorite .... the people who voted Bush into office are stupid. No elitism there. :cof:

i know. calling me a 'stupid, uneducated, unenlightened redneck' is a 100% guaranteed way to get me to NOT vote for the liberals, aside from their lack of morals and hypocricy...calling me names is not going to get me to change my mind on where i stand.

 

[Bullypulpit]

Seriously Avatar, I just think pulit is a big, damn, joke. Him and gabby together can't make a pimple on a conservatives ass. They truely don't have much more to contribute other than smart ass bull shit, so VERY typical of a liberal. Think about it... EVERY LIBERAL WE HAVE, or HAVE HAD, ON THIS BOARD is a consumate SMART ASS! When the facts and the truth are bared, they CONSISTANTLY fall back on being SHIT BAGS, with nothing at all to say of substance. We see it EVERY TIME!!!

We see it here with the peon liberals, and we see it with their leaders. Al Gore... screamer, Howie Dean... screamer, Hitlery Clinton... screamer, Ted (murderer) Kennedy... screamer, the list goes on and on. These people are vile, shrill, and livid with anger against Conservatives because we now have the power. We have taken it away from them. And now they don't see ANY WAY TO GET IT BACK. And I'll tell you WHY they can't get it back... it's because of the internet and boards like this. Liberals can no longer LIE! Because as soon as they do, it's exposed, and this exposure is starting to wake people up, and people DON'T LIKE WHAT THEY SEE WHEN THEY SEE LIBERALS FOR WHAT THEY ARE!!!

You bet your ass things are changing. Conservatives are leading the country, and people like it that way... MORE AND MORE people, and the tide doesn't look like it's going to swing back to LIBERAL power ANY TIME SOON.

THANK GOD!!! Hear that liberals???!!! GOD!!!

Don't need to "...make a pimple on a conservative's ass...". After all, y'all have already got that drug addled wind-bag, Rush Limbaugh, who's attatched to a giant anal cyst.

And, which <b>GOD</b> would that be?

 

[Bullypulpit]

Amen, Pale! Thanks to the internet, talk radio and Fox news, the libs no longer have a strangle hold on the media, and the truth is coming out.

And what truth might that be. All I'm seeing coming out of FOX news and the conservative shills is whatever Big-Lie the adminstration is pimping at any given moment. Of course, FOX News is looking desperately for another missing white-woman story to deflect attention from the widening scandals surrounding Dubbyuh and his merry band.

LooK! Look over here at the shiny keys! Bright! Shiny! Nothing to see over there!

You guys are a riot! When are you gonna take yer act to Comedy Central?

 

[007]

Don't need to "...make a pimple on a conservative's ass...". After all, y'all have already got that drug addled wind-bag, Rush Limbaugh, who's attatched to a giant anal cyst.

And, which <b>GOD</b> would that be?

Take a hike ya wind bag. You're not worth the effort it would take to piss a hole in a snow bank... :finger:

 

[Bullypulpit]

Take a hike ya wind bag. You're not worth the effort it would take to piss a hole in a snow bank... :finger:

Can't stand the heat, get outta the kitchen. :teeth:

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Fascism is commonly defined as an open terror-based dictatorship which is:

Reactionary: makes policy based upon current circumstances rather than creating policies to prevent problems; piles lies and misnomers on top of more lies until the truth becomes indistinguishable, revised or forgotten.

Chauvinistic: Two or more tiered legal systems, varying rights based upon superficial characteristics such as race, creed and origin.

Imperialist elements of finance capital: Extending a nation's authority by territorial acquisition or by the establishment of economic and political domination of one state over its allies.

Socialism

A theory or system of social reform which contemplates a complete reconstruction of society, with a more just and equitable distribution of property and labor. In popular usage, the term is often employed to indicate any lawless, revolutionary social scheme. See Communism, Fourierism, Saint-Simonianism, forms of socialism.


Now granted that socialism often gets bastardized and fucked royally by politicians bent on becomeing tyrants, after which it becomes facism. However the two are not the same, or even similar.

Fascism is characterized by a reaction to current circumstances? You're smoking peyote dude. Do you always make shit up?

 

[ThomasPaine]

But there was one to revive and (Oh my God) those socialist economic practices worked.




Different context from what, the current economic, or the ten commandments thing.

If the former then I agree, it was a totaly different situation one that required a different solution.

If the latter then I disagree, using old evidence to support a current arguement, you diaprove of it here yet I have never seen you question it for the ten commandments issue.

there was another downturn in 1937 when FDR's programs were curtailed because of budget defecits. Ultimately WWII pulled the US out of the depression. Lesson honorable children friends.. Government spending can bump an economy up temporarily, but since the money has to come from somewhere, it can't work long term..... http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/Lesson_90_Notes.htm

 

[007]

Can't stand the heat, get outta the kitchen.

There ain't no heat in the kitchen you're talking about, oh stagnant one.

 

[Gunny]

And what truth might that be. All I'm seeing coming out of FOX news and the conservative shills is whatever Big-Lie the adminstration is pimping at any given moment. Of course, FOX News is looking desperately for another missing white-woman story to deflect attention from the widening scandals surrounding Dubbyuh and his merry band.

LooK! Look over here at the shiny keys! Bright! Shiny! Nothing to see over there!

You guys are a riot! When are you gonna take yer act to Comedy Central?

Translation: not paying attention to unimaginative leftist morons when they start squealing "Abu Ghraib, Abu Ghraib ..." again. 'Bout time for that quarterly beating of THAT dead horse again, ain't it?

 

[deaddude]

there was another downturn in 1937 when FDR's programs were curtailed because of budget defecits. Ultimately WWII pulled the US out of the depression. Lesson honorable children friends.. Government spending can bump an economy up temporarily, but since the money has to come from somewhere, it can't work long term..... http://www.socialstudieshelp.com/Lesson_90_Notes.htm

I never thought it could, I was just argueing that liberal economics do not neccesarilly kill an economy.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

I never thought it could, I was just argueing that liberal economics do not neccesarilly kill an economy.

Correction, they necessarily kill healthy, flourishing economies. My bad.

 

[deaddude]

Fascism is characterized by a reaction to current circumstances? You're smoking peyote dude. Do you always make shit up?

No I am not smoking peyote, and no I do not make shit up I looked both of the words up. Try it, you may find different definitions but they will be simialer.

 

[deaddude]

Correction, they necessarily kill healthy, flourishing economies. My bad.

Different situaltions call for different practices.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Different situaltions call for different practices.

Thanks, einstein. Liberals hate a flourishing economy, because it is NOT the time to institute their redistribution and power grab schemes. Even when it's good, they brazenly lie to convince people their only hope for survival is socialist oppression.

 

[deaddude]

Again you make wild acusations while providing no evudence to back them up.

Liberals hate a Flourshing economy? Prove it.

Under the clinton administration unemployment rates declined steadily, only a few months after bush took office they began to rise.

The stock market was on a steady increase during the clinton administration, bush takes office and it starts to decline.

I am sorry but where are you getting the idea that liberal economics kill the economy.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Again you make wild acusations while providing no evudence to back them up.

The evidence is all around. SO called liberal economists like paul krugass bend over backwards to twist current positive numbers into something bad.

I'll not provide a link. IT's obvious if you go through life with your eyes and ears open.

Liberals hate a Flourshing economy? Prove it.

Again, the proof is their refusal to even acknowledge a good economy, choosing instead to believe their own lies.

Under the clinton administration unemployment rates declined steadily, only a few months after bush took office they began to rise.

This was due to the crash in the tech bubble.

The stock market was on a steady increase during the clinton administration, bush takes office and it starts to decline.

I am sorry but where are you getting the idea that liberal economics kill the economy.

Plus clinton was fairly centrist on economic matters, much to the chagrin of the moonbats of your party.

Major growths in the economy occurred under huge tax cuts from Kennedy, Reagan/Bush, and now under Bush II. Contrast this with the economic stagnation of the economy under Carter. And carter blamed the people.

 

[insein]

Right at the end where you see that 2000 mark go down. Thats the start of a recession (2 straight quarters of negative growth).

But i suppose Bush caused that by his running for presidency. I mean he is all powerful. He has concocted a war, destroyed an american economy, setup a theocratic state and managed to take another 5 week vacation. Yet he's the biggest moron this side of Gomer pile.

 

[deaddude]

Look, I am just saying, it seems very coinidental after several years of steady growth under one president (who was very centrist on economic matters) that it begins to decline very close to the exchange of office, and continues to decline for sometime afterward.

It seems coincidental the the tech bubble burst right after bush takeing office.

 

[rtwngAvngr]

Look, I am just saying, it seems very coinidental after several years of steady growth under one president (who was very centrist on economic matters) that it begins to decline very close to the exchange of office, and continues to decline for sometime afterward.

Why don't you look into the actual reasons instead of doing a superficial glance.

It seems coincidental the the tech bubble burst right after bush takeing office.

Yes. A coincidence, not related to policy. Good point.

 

[deaddude]

Why don't you look into the actual reasons instead of doing a superficial glance.


Yes. A coincidence, not related to policy. Good point.

Why do you look at every thing as being Lib = Bad, Con = good. Despite the reasons for the recession, you must admit that a liberal president had the economy running smoothly.

Ergo Liberals do not hate a thriving economy, also liberal (or at least moderate) economics do not neccesarily result in the death of a thriving economy, Ergo two of your above statements which you provided no evidence to back up in the first place are seemingly reduced to bullshit.