Why isn't 15 weeks long enough for a woman to decide to destroy her fetus?

[rightwinger]

The same logic can be used to say that a lackeys life should be left to the mob boss and the general.

Life is life, it’s not subjective based on some random doctors opinion

Damn Boi…..

You suck at analogies

 

[HeyNorm]

Only if the mother can die

Do we protect men from selective service if they might die?

Be happy for what you got.

 

[HeyNorm]

You just said it. It’s HER fetus.

Then it’s personal property and the man can’t be held responsible for what she does with it.

Thanks.

 

[LibertyKid]

Why can't people just happily accept voters in each state deciding? Ignorance.

Because politicians, the MSM, and various other factions have made it a political issue while hedging their bets that American's don't understand that the States should be left to decide.

 

[rightwinger]

Because politicians, the MSM, and various other factions have made it a political issue while hedging their bets that American's don't understand that the States should be left to decide.

States got to decide on slavery
States got to decide on Civil Rights
States got to decide on the rights of gays

Your rights as an American shouldn’t change depending on which state you are in

 

[LibertyKid]

States got to decide on slavery
States got to decide on Civil Rights
States got to decide on the rights of gays

Your point?

Your rights as an American shouldn’t change depending on which state you are in

I'm curious, are you in favor of abolishing state lines, state constitutions, and removing the framework of the country and giving the Federal Gov't absolute rule?

 

[CowboyTed]

Arizona's limit of 15 weeks fetal age on abortion is in line with what Trump advocates. So why have the Democrats spent $100 million dollars in Arizona on Trump and Kari Lakes' "ABORTION BAN"? This completely false political hit job has almost certainly dashed Kari Lakes chances. So much for "clean election" laws. The Democrats have gone straight to gutter politics.

Furthermore, Prop 139 as I have posted is ANOTHER TOTAL LIE that proclaims it must pass to insure WOMENS' RIGHTS ARE UPHELD. What it really does is remove ALL RESTRICTIONS on fetal age for abortion. All the woman has to do is claim her "mental health" is at risk and she can terminate all the way to the 9th month. And just to be clear, there is no difference between a late term abortion and someone shooting your newborn baby in the head. Zero difference. So think about before you vote for a WOMEN'S RIGHT TO CHOOSE.

Trump appointed Judges who implemented the this effective ban all the way down to IVF...

Trump doesn't take responsibility for the consequences of his actions no matter how many times he is told. He uses the usual 'How could anyone have known?'
Sorry, but a fuck load people who are smarter than you knew and you arrogantly didn't listen to them.

So Trump owns this shit, they are consequences of his actions, he will not take responsibility for his actions...
MAGA will say he is owning the Libs... Libs are defined as anyone that doesn't support Trump.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Damn Boi…..

You suck at analogies

Both are independent individuals deciding on whether another life they hold power over is allowed to continue based on circumstances

 

[rightwinger]

Your point?

I'm curious, are you in favor of abolishing state lines, state constitutions, and removing the framework of the country and giving the Federal Gov't absolute rule?

I find it curious that those who demand States Rights are always talking about denying individual rights to its citizens

 

[Mr. Friscus]

States got to decide on slavery
States got to decide on Civil Rights
States got to decide on the rights of gays

Your rights as an American shouldn’t change depending on which state you are in

While I agree as far as abortion, we need states to try different things to see what works.

Otherwise, we get ivory tower overlords dictating to the masses one-size-fits-all edicts (just like your democrat overlords dictated who you will vote for this election, you didn’t have a say).

Just imagine if Biden was in office during initial COVID breakouts… he wouldn’t have allowed Governors to handle their states, and twice as many people would be dead, as leftist shutdown states with Democrat policies had massively more deaths than conservative states

 

[rightwinger]

Just imagine if Biden was in office during initial COVID breakouts… he wouldn’t have allowed Governors to handle their states, and twice as many people would be dead, as leftist shutdown states with Democrat policies had massively more deaths than conservative states

Any President of either party would have provided better leadership than Trump

Most would have used he crisis to unite the country and demand sacrifices

Trump took no responsibility, passed tough decisions down to the states and passed misinformation as he downplayed the threat.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Any President of either party would have provided better leadership than Trump

Most would have used he crisis to unite the country and demand sacrifices

Trump took no responsibility, passed tough decisions down to the states and passed misinformation as he downplayed the threat.

States have different issues, and there were different ideas on what would be the best way to deal with COVID.

Trump wisely allowed a diversity of solutions to be employed to see what worked, and we saw the numbers. Conservative states fared much better, as we followed the data while you bowed to the demagogue Fauci who declared “I am the science!”. If we had your way, the shut-down democrat model would have been enforced across the nation and significantly more people would be dead.

I’m glad your policies weren’t federally enforced, it saved lots of lives, and that’s not in dispute.

So you’re hanging onto demonizing Trump even though had you had your way more people would be dead. Yikes

 

[j-mac]

Because sometimes you are not aware of pregnancy issues till late in the pregnancy.
Some women are informed that the fetus has medical issues and that the baby will never survive outside the womb.

That is why it is an issue best left to a woman and her doctor

The cases you’re speaking of are statistically insignificant…

It all boils down to how much one values human life over contraceptive convenience

 

[Mr. Friscus]

The cases you’re speaking of are statistically insignificant…

It all boils down to how much one values human life over contraceptive convenience

They have to sprint to the extreme exception, and don’t want to address the extreme majority of reasons for abortions.. which is cowardly.

Deep down they know they have to keep the dehumanized ideological veil over the issue, because the more we see and know about a fetus, the more we see how human it is.

They can’t have that, so their aggressive hyperbolic propaganda intensifies.

There’s a reason why it’s normal to assume that a woman who identifies as a strong feminist isn’t an overly kind, appreciative, or happy person. That’s a pretty strongly proven stereotype

 

[rightwinger]

The cases you’re speaking of are statistically insignificant…

It all boils down to how much one values human life over contraceptive convenience

You are partially correct..

The number of women seeking late term abortions is very, very low in spite of Republican claims that it happens frequently
The Trump claim of abortions after birth is just plain wrong.

Women who seek a late term abortion have legitimate reasons that they have discussed with their doctors. “Contraceptive convenience” is not one of those reasons

 

[martybegan]

Because sometimes you are not aware of pregnancy issues till late in the pregnancy.
Some women are informed that the fetus has medical issues and that the baby will never survive outside the womb.

That is why it is an issue best left to a woman and her doctor

That's called non-viable, and covered under most of these laws.

 

[martybegan]

Only if the mother can die

Or if the fetus is non-viable.

 

[rightwinger]

That's called non-viable, and covered under most of these laws.

Yet, we have Red States threatening doctors and demanding such pregnancies go full term.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

You are partially correct..

The number of women seeking late term abortions is very, very low in spite of Republican claims that it happens frequently

No, it’s about it being allowed in the first place. Do you think third trimester abortions are moral and should be allowed?

The Trump claim of abortions after birth is just plain wrong.

It has happened a few times. And once is too many, don’t you agree??

Women who seek a late term abortion have legitimate reasons that they have discussed with their doctors. “Contraceptive convenience” is not one of those reasons

What reasons?

They can get a C section for any third trimester issues.

 

[martybegan]

Yet, we have Red States threatening doctors and demanding such pregnancies go full term.

Links?