Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's the guy who got OJ freed and has represented every high profile creep out there, you think she has any chance in a countersuit against someone that savvy, with a lifetime of experience of lying? It would cost her a fortune if she lost, and how could she prove her allegations?Idiot much? You answered your own lie. Forced to retract. Hoe gonna spout off for $$$$ perhaps
So if you had a guaranteed win it does not matter. It just matters that the guy who won has them.It's not who had them first, it's who had them last.
Funny we have anonymous sources leaking everything under the sun almost daily. But let’s use that as an excuse.The FAVORITE talking point.
It's in every memo.
Repeat the lie and it becomes your truth.
The files could not be broadly released prior because many were under court-ordered seal or legally protected. But in 2025:
- Congress used its subpoena power to force production.
- The DOJ/FBI is releasing batches of documents that are legally permissible to release (i.e., no grand-jury transcripts, no child-porn material, or else redacted).
- Political and institutional pressure is stronger, so the release is being actually pursued rather than stalled.
Congressional action & subpoena power
- The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform received a subpoena from Congress demanding from the DOJ records related to Epstein. On 2 Sept 2025 they announced the release of 33,295 pages of records provided by DOJ. Oversight
Committee- This means that Congress (through its oversight function) is exerting pressure to release documents. That is different from previous purely executive/departmental decisions.
You make no sense.So if you had a guaranteed win it does not matter. It just matters that the guy who won has them.
Can you say crazy?
You make no sense when you pretend that Biden or Harris would not have used the files to keep Trump from winning. But I am used to you having no real pointYou make no sense.
It's OK though, I'm used to it happening here.
YOu assume that because it's what you would have done.You make no sense when you pretend that Biden or Harris would not have used the files to keep Trump from winning. But I am used to you having no real point
No I understand humans, I also understand politicians and I understand really stupid democrat politiciansYOu assume that because it's what you would have done.
Poor kid looks like I hurt your feelingsYOu assume that because it's what you would have done.
You make no sense when you pretend that Biden or Harris would not have used the files to keep Trump from winning. But I am used to you having no real point
Where would you get that idea?Poor kid looks like I hurt your feelings
lol. Child I am far from what you claim. I am more than aware of how indoctrinated democrats are though. Feelings get hurt when you point out things wrong with them or their partyWhere would you get that idea?
You tRumplings are weird.
To believe Dems had evidence Trump fucked kids, yet did not use this evidence to prosecute or at least politically damage Trump is laughable.lol. Child I am far from what you claim. I am more than aware of how indoctrinated democrats are though. Feelings get hurt when you point out things wrong with them or their party
Nobody cares what you think, you freakish little twit.I think its likely he was involved. The thing is the longer je covers up the guiltier he looks.
He will be dead soon Hollie. How will you cope ?Nobody cares what you think, you freakish little twit.
I will cope with our problems when you die.He will be dead soon Hollie. How will you cope ?