WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
^^^ I should add, there is a lot of grey area here.
If the story is not true, it's a pretty clear attempt to extort money. If the story is true, the person has a right to go public with it, and an NDA is a legal way to prevent that from happening.
I think it would be hard to bring an extortion charge against her, the State would have to prove her story was not true and her motive was to enrich herself.
Her attorney is the one who approached AMI- it was not the other way around. Same with McDougal.
It wasn't like Pecker just heard these stories were out there on the open market, and tracked down the attorney on his own initiative.
I don't think there is really any dispute that they bought the stories to. suppress them.
Correct. "Her attorney is the one who approached AMI-..." which is what I said.
Daniels approached the media (a.k.a. American Media, Inc.) was a media company where Pecker was the CEO and they published the National Enquirer. She, through her lawyer, went to the media - not directly to Trump.
Which is what I said. It was when Pecker backed off because he found out from his lawyers that the "catch and kill" conspiracy was opening him to criminal jeopardy. That and FPOTUS#45 hadn't paid him back for the doorman and McDougal story yet and he wasn't a piggy-bank.
WW