Why is Malcom X Celebrated in this Country?

[Asclepias]

Your ignorance is astoubnding.... Civil rights amendments are Republican inventions

Your ignorance of time and history is astounding. All the people that were against Civil Rights migrated to the Republican party from the Democratic party.

I keep forgetting you idiots believe the magical party switch even though Democrats kept all their racists like Gore, Byrd and Kennedy.

The Dixiecrats moved to the Reps like Thurmond and Helm but others flat out quit. Some did stay with the Dems but later regretted going against the legislation and renounced racism. ryd for example. Like I said earlier what use to be the Dixiecrats is now the Reps. Reps want to turn back the clock socially. Not a good look.

 

[thanatos144]

Your ignorance of time and history is astounding. All the people that were against Civil Rights migrated to the Republican party from the Democratic party.

I keep forgetting you idiots believe the magical party switch even though Democrats kept all their racists like Gore, Byrd and Kennedy.

The Dixiecrats moved to the Reps like Thurmond and Helm but others flat out quit. Some did stay with the Dems but later regretted going against the legislation and renounced racism. ryd for example. Like I said earlier what use to be the Dixiecrats is now the Reps. Reps want to turn back the clock socially. Not a good look.

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

 

[Asclepias]

There is an epidemic, it is not shown on the news.
The Nambla/liberal mantra says only whites are racists.
All racist crimes against whites will not be considered racist.
Payback at best!
If there were 39 white on black race crimes for every black on white race crime you would be singing a different song.
You link to one waitress fired.
Should I link to some racism against whites?

I can find dozens very quickly.
I can show you media coverup too.

You are thoroughly confused Paul. Black people can be racists. I think you are talking about the hate crime law which I have heard that Holder said should not apply to people that were historically discriminated against. Sort of kills the reason for the law. It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority. This was in part because of the lack of morality among white jurors that would find whites not guilty of murder towards Blacks.

You said there was no more discrimination. I showed you just one example. Please show me the media coverup. This should be fun.

You really should educate yourself before you go making shit up.



Hate Crime Act

As Amended, 28 U.S.C. § 534

§ “[Sec. 1.] (a) This Act may be cited as the ‘Hate Crime Statistics Act’.

“(1) Under the authority of section 534 of title 28, United States Code, the Attorney General shall acquire data, for each calendar year, about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, gender and gender identity, [emphasis added] religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder, non-negligent manslaughter; forcible rape; aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation; arson; and destruction, damage or vandalism of property.

“(2) The Attorney General shall establish guidelines for the collection of such data including the necessary evidence and criteria that must be present for a finding of manifest prejudice and procedures for carrying out the purposes of this section.

“(3) Nothing in this section creates a cause of action or a right to bring an action, including an action based on discrimination due to sexual orientation. As used in this section, the term ‘sexual orientation’ means consensual homosexuality or heterosexuality. This subsection does not limit any existing cause of action or right to bring an action, including any action under the Administrative Procedure Act or the All Writs Act

[5 U.S.C.S. §§ 551 et seq. or 28 U.S.C.S. § 1651].

“(4) Data acquired under this section shall be used only for research or statistical purposes and may not contain any information that may reveal the identity of an individual victim of a crime.

“(5) The Attorney General shall publish an annual summary of the data acquired under this section, including data about crimes committed by, and crimes directed against, juveniles [emphasis added].

“(c) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section through fiscal year 2002.

“Sec. 2. (a) Congress finds that—

“(1) the American family life is the foundation of American Society,

“(2) Federal policy should encourage the well-being, financial security, and health of the American family,

“(3) schools should not de-emphasize the critical value of American family life.

“(b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed, nor shall any funds appropriated to carry out the purpose of the Act be used, to promote or encourage homosexuality.”


Now please show where it says "It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority".

Those are my words dumbass. I doubt they would write that in the law but that is what it amounts to.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You are thoroughly confused Paul. Black people can be racists. I think you are talking about the hate crime law which I have heard that Holder said should not apply to people that were historically discriminated against. Sort of kills the reason for the law. It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority. This was in part because of the lack of morality among white jurors that would find whites not guilty of murder towards Blacks.

You said there was no more discrimination. I showed you just one example. Please show me the media coverup. This should be fun.

You really should educate yourself before you go making shit up.



Hate Crime Act

As Amended, 28 U.S.C. § 534

§ “[Sec. 1.] (a) This Act may be cited as the ‘Hate Crime Statistics Act’.

“(1) Under the authority of section 534 of title 28, United States Code, the Attorney General shall acquire data, for each calendar year, about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, gender and gender identity, [emphasis added] religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder, non-negligent manslaughter; forcible rape; aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation; arson; and destruction, damage or vandalism of property.

“(2) The Attorney General shall establish guidelines for the collection of such data including the necessary evidence and criteria that must be present for a finding of manifest prejudice and procedures for carrying out the purposes of this section.

“(3) Nothing in this section creates a cause of action or a right to bring an action, including an action based on discrimination due to sexual orientation. As used in this section, the term ‘sexual orientation’ means consensual homosexuality or heterosexuality. This subsection does not limit any existing cause of action or right to bring an action, including any action under the Administrative Procedure Act or the All Writs Act

[5 U.S.C.S. §§ 551 et seq. or 28 U.S.C.S. § 1651].

“(4) Data acquired under this section shall be used only for research or statistical purposes and may not contain any information that may reveal the identity of an individual victim of a crime.

“(5) The Attorney General shall publish an annual summary of the data acquired under this section, including data about crimes committed by, and crimes directed against, juveniles [emphasis added].

“(c) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section through fiscal year 2002.

“Sec. 2. (a) Congress finds that—

“(1) the American family life is the foundation of American Society,

“(2) Federal policy should encourage the well-being, financial security, and health of the American family,

“(3) schools should not de-emphasize the critical value of American family life.

“(b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed, nor shall any funds appropriated to carry out the purpose of the Act be used, to promote or encourage homosexuality.”


Now please show where it says "It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority".

Those are my words dumbass. I doubt they would write that in the law but that is what it amounts to.

And you lied.

That wasn't why the statute was written.


Now prove it was.

 

[Asclepias]

I keep forgetting you idiots believe the magical party switch even though Democrats kept all their racists like Gore, Byrd and Kennedy.

The Dixiecrats moved to the Reps like Thurmond and Helm but others flat out quit. Some did stay with the Dems but later regretted going against the legislation and renounced racism. ryd for example. Like I said earlier what use to be the Dixiecrats is now the Reps. Reps want to turn back the clock socially. Not a good look.

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

 

[Asclepias]

You really should educate yourself before you go making shit up.



Hate Crime Act

As Amended, 28 U.S.C. § 534

§ “[Sec. 1.] (a) This Act may be cited as the ‘Hate Crime Statistics Act’.

“(1) Under the authority of section 534 of title 28, United States Code, the Attorney General shall acquire data, for each calendar year, about crimes that manifest evidence of prejudice based on race, gender and gender identity, [emphasis added] religion, disability, sexual orientation, or ethnicity, including where appropriate the crimes of murder, non-negligent manslaughter; forcible rape; aggravated assault, simple assault, intimidation; arson; and destruction, damage or vandalism of property.

“(2) The Attorney General shall establish guidelines for the collection of such data including the necessary evidence and criteria that must be present for a finding of manifest prejudice and procedures for carrying out the purposes of this section.

“(3) Nothing in this section creates a cause of action or a right to bring an action, including an action based on discrimination due to sexual orientation. As used in this section, the term ‘sexual orientation’ means consensual homosexuality or heterosexuality. This subsection does not limit any existing cause of action or right to bring an action, including any action under the Administrative Procedure Act or the All Writs Act

[5 U.S.C.S. §§ 551 et seq. or 28 U.S.C.S. § 1651].

“(4) Data acquired under this section shall be used only for research or statistical purposes and may not contain any information that may reveal the identity of an individual victim of a crime.

“(5) The Attorney General shall publish an annual summary of the data acquired under this section, including data about crimes committed by, and crimes directed against, juveniles [emphasis added].

“(c) There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section through fiscal year 2002.

“Sec. 2. (a) Congress finds that—

“(1) the American family life is the foundation of American Society,

“(2) Federal policy should encourage the well-being, financial security, and health of the American family,

“(3) schools should not de-emphasize the critical value of American family life.

“(b) Nothing in this Act shall be construed, nor shall any funds appropriated to carry out the purpose of the Act be used, to promote or encourage homosexuality.”


Now please show where it says "It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority".

Those are my words dumbass. I doubt they would write that in the law but that is what it amounts to.

And you lied.

That wasn't why the statute was written.


Now prove it was.

Do you understand what "my words" mean? Thats my interpretation of what Holder was saying. How is that a lie? Please prove it.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

The Dixiecrats moved to the Reps like Thurmond and Helm but others flat out quit. Some did stay with the Dems but later regretted going against the legislation and renounced racism. ryd for example. Like I said earlier what use to be the Dixiecrats is now the Reps. Reps want to turn back the clock socially. Not a good look.

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

Three out of how many?

Congratulations!!! You have just shown yourself to be a total liar.

 

[Asclepias]

There is an epidemic, it is not shown on the news.
The Nambla/liberal mantra says only whites are racists.
All racist crimes against whites will not be considered racist.
Payback at best!
If there were 39 white on black race crimes for every black on white race crime you would be singing a different song.
You link to one waitress fired.
Should I link to some racism against whites?

I can find dozens very quickly.
I can show you media coverup too.

You are thoroughly confused Paul. Black people can be racists. I think you are talking about the hate crime law which I have heard that Holder said should not apply to people that were historically discriminated against. Sort of kills the reason for the law. It was done to provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority. This was in part because of the lack of morality among white jurors that would find whites not guilty of murder towards Blacks.

You said there was no more discrimination. I showed you just one example. Please show me the media coverup. This should be fun.

A quick google search revealed hundreds of links.

Here you go.
Flash mobs targeting non blacks for violence and robbery.
Nothing in the liberal media mind you!!
Everyone knows of Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman yet no one has heard of DeMarquis Elkins.
Should Black People Tolerate This? | CNS News Mobile

How is it a media cover up if you were able to find out about it? People heard about Demarquis Elkins but it went away because he was promptly arrested and charged. No news story there.

 

[Asclepias]

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

Three out of how many?

Congratulations!!! You have just shown yourself to be a total liar.

Dont get stuck on the numbers. I made a general statement using all. I know thats all you have. Please check the point of my saying that.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Those are my words dumbass. I doubt they would write that in the law but that is what it amounts to.

And you lied.

That wasn't why the statute was written.


Now prove it was.

Do you understand what "my words" mean? Thats my interpretation of what Holder was saying. How is that a lie? Please prove it.

Yes "your words" proved you to be a liar because "your words" were not the truth.

The proof is in this thread. You stated the law was made to "provide and extra penalty for a white person committing a crime against a minority".

I showed you the statute.

No where in the statute does it say anything remotely resembling your claim.

 

[thanatos144]

The Dixiecrats moved to the Reps like Thurmond and Helm but others flat out quit. Some did stay with the Dems but later regretted going against the legislation and renounced racism. ryd for example. Like I said earlier what use to be the Dixiecrats is now the Reps. Reps want to turn back the clock socially. Not a good look.

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

Name them.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

Three out of how many?

Congratulations!!! You have just shown yourself to be a total liar.

Dont get stuck on the numbers. I made a general statement using all. I know thats all you have. Please check the point of my saying that.

Hey stupid, you said that the Dixiecrats became Republicans when you should have said three Dixiecrats became Republican while 80 percent went to the Democrat party.

Your dishonesty is becoming more apparent with each post.

 

[thanatos144]

Three out of how many?

Congratulations!!! You have just shown yourself to be a total liar.

Dont get stuck on the numbers. I made a general statement using all. I know thats all you have. Please check the point of my saying that.

Hey stupid, you said that the Dixiecrats became Republicans when you should have said three Dixiecrats became Republican while 80 percent went to the Democrat party.

Your dishonesty is becoming more apparent with each post.

LOL isn't it funny how their moral superiority is based on a lie?

 

[Asclepias]

LOL ONE person became a republican LOL

I believe it was 3 at least. My point is that the ideology was brought to the Reps and they have displayed that consistently.

Name them.

You can look it up. I already listed 2. Not really important to my point.

 

[Asclepias]

Three out of how many?

Congratulations!!! You have just shown yourself to be a total liar.

Dont get stuck on the numbers. I made a general statement using all. I know thats all you have. Please check the point of my saying that.

Hey stupid, you said that the Dixiecrats became Republicans when you should have said three Dixiecrats became Republican while 80 percent went to the Democrat party.

Your dishonesty is becoming more apparent with each post.

Sue me. Again my point is that the ideology moved to the Rep party.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Dont get stuck on the numbers. I made a general statement using all. I know thats all you have. Please check the point of my saying that.

Hey stupid, you said that the Dixiecrats became Republicans when you should have said three Dixiecrats became Republican while 80 percent went to the Democrat party.

Your dishonesty is becoming more apparent with each post.

Sue me. Again my point is that the ideology moved to the Rep party.

Another claim you cannot prove.

You do know that just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

 

[Asclepias]

Hey stupid, you said that the Dixiecrats became Republicans when you should have said three Dixiecrats became Republican while 80 percent went to the Democrat party.

Your dishonesty is becoming more apparent with each post.

Sue me. Again my point is that the ideology moved to the Rep party.

Another claim you cannot prove.

You do know that just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

Everything I say is true. You do know that right?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Sue me. Again my point is that the ideology moved to the Rep party.

Another claim you cannot prove.

You do know that just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

Everything I say is true. You do know that right?

I believe you think so.

But you'd be the only one.

The rest of us are smart enough to see you for who you really are which is a coward (dodging direct questions), a liar ( making statements that are not true) and a person with no integrity (who thinks they're above backing up their claims).

 

[Asclepias]

Another claim you cannot prove.

You do know that just because you say something doesn't mean it's true.

Everything I say is true. You do know that right?

I believe you think so.

But you'd be the only one.

The rest of us are smart enough to see you for who you really are which is a coward (dodging direct questions), a liar ( making statements that are not true) and a person with no integrity (who thinks they're above backing up their claims).

Glad we understand each other.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Everything I say is true. You do know that right?

I believe you think so.

But you'd be the only one.

The rest of us are smart enough to see you for who you really are which is a coward (dodging direct questions), a liar ( making statements that are not true) and a person with no integrity (who thinks they're above backing up their claims).

Glad we understand each other.

Glad you accepted the fact that you are a coward and a liar with zero integrity.

Your concession is duly noted.