The5thHorseman
Platinum Member
- Nov 22, 2022
- 12,136
- 6,577
- 918
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
more prepared to take on those who
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
more prepared to take on those who
All you told me was that you knew what you meant.Yes, unlike you, I don't run from my words.
Or, perhaps you aren't very bright.No, I was referring to your post:
"But you can't discuss it here, on the surface.....where open speculation about pederasty is deafening, and unmolested."
You seem to be in some other conversation or some fantasy about pederasty. Seemed kinda deranged, IMO.
But you are still the only one clear on what you meant, which rather defeats the point of posting.I am quite clear on what I meant.
All you told me was that you knew what you meant.
So do I.
When you figure out what you meant, read my post again, then tell me who's running from what.
But you are still the only one clear on what you meant, which rather defeats the point of posting.
All you told me was that you knew what you meant.
So do I.
No...My position is clear.You are running from your words.
Next question.
And whatever it is, he has been invited to bring it.But you are still the only one clear on what you meant, which rather defeats the point of posting.
Or, you’re creepy.Or, perhaps you aren't very bright.
Fragile masculinity....and the larger the motorcycle motorcade, the smaller the pee pee.Men who gave up their Bud Light as an expression of their Rampant Heterosexuality are now fawning like pre-teen girls over a photograph.
This is not a very nuanced contradiction, people.
But you can't discuss it here, on the surface.....where open speculation about pederasty is deafening, and unmolested.
Is that because it is Politically Incorrect?
No...My position is clear.
Yours is vaguely menacing.
My statement is unambiguous.You are backpedaling in a swerving maner.
And you are not very good at it.
My statement is unambiguous.
Yours is redolent with malice.
If it was a debate you had in mind, you know where to bring it....if it is some form of Street Ritual, you are equally welcome.
Is that clearish?
What fucking context is that?You just contradicted yourself.
But that is typical.
In context, yours was the one with malicious undertones. I was simply asking for clarification.
That much is very clear.
What fucking context is that?
You won't tell anyone.
Lemme axe you why you so obsessed with the Orange Man?Men who gave up their Bud Light as an expression of their Rampant Heterosexuality are now fawning like pre-teen girls over a photograph.
This is not a very nuanced contradiction, people.
But you can't discuss it here, on the surface.....where open speculation about pederasty is deafening, and unmolested.
Is that because it is Politically Incorrect?
Lemme axe you why you so obsessed with the Orange Man?