It will not effect costs at all since non profit status will mean less efficiency.
But you will see worse care and service as profits are typically used for increasing innovations.
No one has ever shown that non profit anything reduces costs. But it does make liberals feel good that they can deny someone some money.
thats actually where you are wrong. one non profit health care provider does exist and it is Kaiser. they own and operate their own health care facilities and provide their own health insurance. this has allowed them to reduce operating costs and pump all potential profits back into the system to lower consumer costs.
example: (quote straight from their website, you can plug in the numbers if you like)
30 year old male, los angeles, ca, non smoker
$25 Co pay, $0 annual deductible, $1500 out of pocket annual max, hospitalization $250
Kaiser HMO - $150 / month
the closest plans found:
Blue Shield PPO - $226 / month
$25 Co pay, $0 annual deductible, $6000 out of pocket annual max, hospitalization $500
Aetna doesnt even offer a plan with $0 deductible
but with a $35 copay - $3,500 deductible and 30% co insurance the rate is $176
can you explain the huge price differences?