Why does Harris say she owns a firearm when now her staff sez she don't

Kamala has no substance other than attacking Trump. No one cares about her damn upbringing or her stupid stint as a prosecutor. She answered no questions whatsoever yet here you are trying to claim she won..... :laughing0301:
Her plan for assistance to first time buyer, and small businesses was ok, as was her answer on abortion and her position on supporting Ukraine. Donny's were crap and he kept going off on tangents to crazy crap as dangle a hook at the end of her answers, that hooked him every time, as he just isn't too bright. Yes, she was far better prepare, had better delivery, countered any attempt he mad to land a punch, and mopped the floor with him, on the debate stage, even FOX NEWS and their focus group said he lost, like all the other polling from around the country said he lost. It wasn't even close. Sorry.
 
Her plan for assistance to first time buyer, and small businesses was ok, as was her answer on abortion and her position on supporting Ukraine. Donny's were crap and he kept going off on tangents to crazy crap as dangle a hook at the end of her answers, that hooked him every time, as he just isn't too bright. Yes, she was far better prepare, had better delivery, countered any attempt he mad to land a punch, and mopped the floor with him, on the debate stage, even FOX NEWS and their focus group said he lost, like all the other polling from around the country said he lost. It wasn't even close. Sorry.
So who’s gonna PAY for that useless vote pandering shit Kamala proposes? On abortion all she did was call Trump a liar using Democrat talking points. She had no answer on Ukraine other than again, Democrat, talking points. I found her smirks, looks of contempt, while Trump was talking to be childlike and disrespectful. She was more into denigrating Trump than actually discussing policy.
 
So who’s gonna PAY for that useless vote pandering shit Kamala proposes? On abortion all she did was call Trump a liar using Democrat talking points. She had no answer on Ukraine other than again, Democrat, talking points. I found her smirks, looks of contempt, while Trump was talking to be childlike and disrespectful. She was more into denigrating Trump than actually discussing policy.
Go talk to everybody else, as they agree with me, not you on Trump blowing the debate. I think it was because he is just old and can no longer keep up with people that are younger, smarter, and better prepared. I tried to get you guys to go with Nikki. Now it is too late
 
Go talk to everybody else, as they agree with me, not you on Trump blowing the debate. I think it was because he is just old and can no longer keep up with people that are younger, smarter, and better prepared. I tried to get you guys to go with Nikki. Now it is too late
So, did 'smart' Kamala tell you how she is going to pay for all her give away programs yet? Has 'smart' Kamala ever told you why the fuck she claimed Biden was 'sharp as a tack?' Is she really for fracking now when she was against it in the past? Wait a minute, she never changed because formerly she was referring to the Biden regime which she was a part of. What is the real truth with her anyway? I thought she was the 'border Czar'....... why she was gonna go to South America and whip her some Cartel ass. Uh........Kamala? Kamala? She musta flew da coop. Biden/Harris want to tax unearned gains. IOW if they THINK you are going to make a profit, they will tax you before you get that profit. My, what a swell idea, huh? I got news for ya, 'everybody else' thinks Kamala's just another Obama puppet. She's even more vacuous than Biden but at least she can take orders, memorize and not check out in the middle of a dissertation. She's a much better 'candidate' than the actual elected one so Democrats just push her on us.
 
So, did 'smart' Kamala tell you how she is going to pay for all her give away programs yet? Has 'smart' Kamala ever told you why the fuck she claimed Biden was 'sharp as a tack?' Is she really for fracking now when she was against it in the past? Wait a minute, she never changed because formerly she was referring to the Biden regime which she was a part of. What is the real truth with her anyway? I thought she was the 'border Czar'....... why she was gonna go to South America and whip her some Cartel ass. Uh........Kamala? Kamala? She musta flew da coop. Biden/Harris want to tax unearned gains. IOW if they THINK you are going to make a profit, they will tax you before you get that profit. My, what a swell idea, huh? I got news for ya, 'everybody else' thinks Kamala's just another Obama puppet. She's even more vacuous than Biden but at least she can take orders, memorize and not check out in the middle of a dissertation. She's a much better 'candidate' than the actual elected one so Democrats just push her on us.
The usual, blather about making the rich pay a "fair" share on taxes. Whatever that really means. At 70, it does not concern me much. We won't go bankrupt during my remaining lifetime. Also, I have seen, wealthy people, those that made it working and those that inherited old money. All, good people, for the most part, and mostly good managers of what they have, better at it than most. The working ones work, plan, manage and are successful in what they apply themselves to, no matter the changes in tax structure or political wind. I am not worried for them financially, as they have continuously applied their skills and abilities to being successful, taking care of themselves and using whatever system is at place in the time to make their way, and always will. God Bless them and more power to them. I am not a "soak the rich" advocate, but I do realize, between local, state and federal taxation, I pay a higher percentage of taxation on my income to the tax man, (which also has not bothered me), over the years, as I have been a pretty good manager, myself, and like them, continued to make my way, no matter the evolving political/economic, and minor taxation differences in place.
 
The usual, blather about making the rich pay a "fair" share on taxes. Whatever that really means. At 70, it does not concern me much. We won't go bankrupt during my remaining lifetime. Also, I have seen, wealthy people, those that made it working and those that inherited old money. All, good people, for the most part, and mostly good managers of what they have, better at it than most. The working ones work, plan, manage and are successful in what they apply themselves to, no matter the changes in tax structure or political wind. I am not worried for them financially, as they have continuously applied their skills and abilities to being successful, taking care of themselves and using whatever system is at place in the time to make their way, and always will. God Bless them and more power to them. I am not a "soak the rich" advocate, but I do realize, between local, state and federal taxation, I pay a higher percentage of taxation on my income to the tax man, (which also has not bothered me), over the years, as I have been a pretty good manager, myself, and like them, continued to make my way, no matter the evolving political/economic, and minor taxation differences in place.
The rich pay a very high amount of taxes. The Federal and state taxes are not the only measuring stick of what is being paid out by the rich. And to your point, I'll agree, I am where I am at, not because of any sitting president's actions. My wife and I are where we are at because of the choices we have made that have put is in the position we are in.

However, what we should ask is this. What is fair? In the world of "equality or equity", isn't a flat rate tax the best route?
We should also be asking, what is right? Taxing unrealized capital gains? In a 1780's world, people are taking up arms for that shit if politicians tried to pass such rubbish. We SHOULD care, even if legislation or tax laws don't directly affect us because we aren't in THAT bracket. Every American should care out of principal alone.
 
The rich pay a very high amount of taxes. The Federal and state taxes are not the only measuring stick of what is being paid out by the rich. And to your point, I'll agree, I am where I am at, not because of any sitting president's actions. My wife and I are where we are at because of the choices we have made that have put is in the position we are in.

However, what we should ask is this. What is fair? In the world of "equality or equity", isn't a flat rate tax the best route?
We should also be asking, what is right? Taxing unrealized capital gains? In a 1780's world, people are taking up arms for that shit if politicians tried to pass such rubbish. We SHOULD care, even if legislation or tax laws don't directly affect us because we aren't in THAT bracket. Every American should care out of principal alone.
Your second paragraph, first two sentences are the crux of the biscuit. It is the exact question, "What is fair?", and I honestly do not know.

I am not a flat tax advocate, and doubt it being enacted. I have never seen this world of "equality or equity". Where is it, exactly, and what form of government produced it?
 
The usual, blather about making the rich pay a "fair" share on taxes. Whatever that really means. At 70, it does not concern me much. We won't go bankrupt during my remaining lifetime. Also, I have seen, wealthy people, those that made it working and those that inherited old money. All, good people, for the most part, and mostly good managers of what they have, better at it than most. The working ones work, plan, manage and are successful in what they apply themselves to, no matter the changes in tax structure or political wind. I am not worried for them financially, as they have continuously applied their skills and abilities to being successful, taking care of themselves and using whatever system is at place in the time to make their way, and always will. God Bless them and more power to them. I am not a "soak the rich" advocate, but I do realize, between local, state and federal taxation, I pay a higher percentage of taxation on my income to the tax man, (which also has not bothered me), over the years, as I have been a pretty good manager, myself, and like them, continued to make my way, no matter the evolving political/economic, and minor taxation differences in place.
And, after all your good planning, you’d vote for a Marxist that will take aim at your wealth because she tells you that she (government) can spend your wealth better than you?
 
And, after all your good planning, you’d vote for a Marxist that will take aim at your wealth because she tells you that she (government) can spend your wealth better than you?
And you would vote for the fascist wanting to take and centralize control and power? Spare me.:rolleyes:
 
And you would vote for the fascist wanting to take and centralize control and power? Spare me.:rolleyes:
That person is a figment of your imagination. Trump did none of what you claim.
 
Back
Top Bottom