Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Anyone who says there isn't evidence for evolution, hasn't looked for any.
It is a good one. It's good that you revile science and that you reject out of hand the overwhelming evidence for evolutionary biology. I suppose someone has to be an audience for the charlatans at the various ID'iot creationist lobbies.Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
It is a good one. It's good that you revile science and that you reject out of hand the overwhelming evidence for evolutionary biology. I suppose someone has to be an audience for the charlatans at the various ID'iot creationist lobbies.Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE..... except for the evidence.It is a good one. It's good that you revile science and that you reject out of hand the overwhelming evidence for evolutionary biology. I suppose someone has to be an audience for the charlatans at the various ID'iot creationist lobbies.Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
You don't read my postings.
I am NOT a creationist
I am saying that there is NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE for
(macro) evolution.
NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE..... except for the evidence.It is a good one. It's good that you revile science and that you reject out of hand the overwhelming evidence for evolutionary biology. I suppose someone has to be an audience for the charlatans at the various ID'iot creationist lobbies.Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
You don't read my postings.
I am NOT a creationist
I am saying that there is NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE for
(macro) evolution.
Correct. All of the relevant sciences are a global conspiracy.NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE..... except for the evidence.It is a good one. It's good that you revile science and that you reject out of hand the overwhelming evidence for evolutionary biology. I suppose someone has to be an audience for the charlatans at the various ID'iot creationist lobbies.Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
You don't read my postings.
I am NOT a creationist
I am saying that there is NO OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE for
(macro) evolution.
nice one!
But won't work of course. saying that there is real evidence is something else then showing there is evidence.
Again, there is none, the Emperor has No Clothes!
Difficukt eh?
Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
[
Correct. All of the relevant sciences are a global conspiracy.
Yea but they're talking about not believing that fish bird reptiles amphibians and mammals aren't related. They say we've never seen one species turn into another species.Anyone who says there isn't evidence for evolution, hasn't looked for any.
Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
What makes you think believing in God will get you to heaven and not believing won't?Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
Why would believing in God get you to heaven and why would not believing there is a God send you somewhere else? If God wanted us to believe he would have done more than just come visit your ancestors 2000 years ago.Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
Jesus H, you do understand there is 'google' now? Type in transitional fossils and you'll get myriads of images. More and more fossils of dinosaurs with feathers are being found.
I mean you deniers at least have to enter the 18th century when you are trying to make this ludicrous argument.
Neither is a bibleWhy do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
Jesus H, you do understand there is 'google' now? Type in transitional fossils and you'll get myriads of images. More and more fossils of dinosaurs with feathers are being found.
I mean you deniers at least have to enter the 18th century when you are trying to make this ludicrous argument.
There are NO transitional fossils.
There are ONLY fossils!
And the evolution believer interpret them as proof for evolution.
where on the fossil does it say where it comes from, who it;s ancestors are? where it was born? And so on and so forth.
They are ONLY evidence if one already believes in the macro-evolution-bullocks.
Other people with common sense see that those fossils are no proof at all!
Why do some people still believe in god??? I mean it is backed up by nothing but a 2,000 year old book.
At least macro evolution has real support.
But it doesn't. It simply doesn't. Once you peal away the endless "it is true" montra, and look at the empirical evidence, there is no real evidence. You realize that in all these hundreds of years of looking, we have yet to find even ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE... of a transitional species. Not even one.
Given how many different kinds of animals there are, we should find hundreds on hundreds of examples, where one animal 'evolved' into another animal, over supposed millions and millions of years.
Not one! Not even ONE.
Now if you don't want to believe in G-d, knock yourself out. When I die I'm going to Heaven, and when you die, you'll go to whatever. Fine. You make your choice.
But don't sit there and claim your belief is "scientific" with your mythical faeries and unicorns, and not a shred of evidence supporting your dreamy fake theories. This is why scientific research is in such a bad state. People pushing ideological myths, instead of real empirical science.
Jesus H, you do understand there is 'google' now? Type in transitional fossils and you'll get myriads of images. More and more fossils of dinosaurs with feathers are being found.
I mean you deniers at least have to enter the 18th century when you are trying to make this ludicrous argument.
There are NO transitional fossils.
There are ONLY fossils!
And the evolution believer interpret them as proof for evolution.
where on the fossil does it say where it comes from, who it;s ancestors are? where it was born? And so on and so forth.
They are ONLY evidence if one already believes in the macro-evolution-bullocks.
Other people with common sense see that those fossils are no proof at all!
those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Don't let your hurt feelings get in the way of gaining some knowledge.those 29+ nonsense...
Well, is'it a bit ONE-SIDED and non-critical?
It really is a cheap bit of garbage, isn't it?
Never have to read so much garbage in my life.
And besides,,,,,,it is extremely boring.
But then..untrue always is,
Hurt feelings?? What are you talking about?
I have so much fun, people putting this nonsense on the internet
and really, really think it is all true. That is awesome mate!
Hurt feelings? That is a good one, isn't it?
[
Anyone who says there is evidence for evolution, hasn't looked at any!
[
They are ONLY evidence if one already believes in the macro-evolution-bullocks.
!
