Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

[Ray From Cleveland]

While Republicans want an economy where as few as possible need government welfare

So, why is it that Republican-controlled states see more welfare usage? Hmm

Because states don't get welfare--people get welfare. That is unless you think every citizen in a Republican state is Republican.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole

Need a good paying job? Be a truck driver. We are short 60,000 drivers now that industry can't find, and it's predicted there will be an increase in shortage as we baby boomers retire.

So send those people our way; plenty of work for them to do.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?

It's all in perception.

When a Democrat hears about somebody on the dole, they picture a hard working man who just got done working 12 hours sitting at the dinner table in a dirty tee shirt from work. He and their three kids are under a 40 watt lightbulb hanging from bare wires from the ceiling.

Mom is putting more water in the soup to make it last longer, and the kids with dirty faces are watching since they don't have a television yet alone video games to pay with.

Liberals have great imaginations.

Republicans don't have that good of imaginations though. We see things through experience like those food stamp people with a heaping cart of TV dinners, prepared drinks, and snacks. Mom is 300 lbs and has four kids with her. She pays for the food with food stamps, and then whips out a wad of cash for the huge bags of dog food, cat litter, cigarettes, wine, perfume and flowers.

 

[tigerred59]

Plenty of jobs out there. Employers can't find Americans to do them because they are sitting home on their Obama phones getting fat on food stamps.

There are no Oblama phones they now be Trump phones, live with it..No such animal as food stamps those died years ago...

Ah, so word games are now your new debate tool?

If you can't stay current don't stay at all. Trump is the president, and the phone assistance for the poor started under Reagan, yeah word games for a word gamer..

Hey, I didn't invent the term Obama Phone.........she did:

Hey!! Isn't that tigerred59 ?

Horse shit, I do hope you get over your obvious obsession with me this year.......I like my men tall dark, black black and blacker!!

 

[danielpalos]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?

It's all in perception.

When a Democrat hears about somebody on the dole, they picture a hard working man who just got done working 12 hours sitting at the dinner table in a dirty tee shirt from work. He and their three kids are under a 40 watt lightbulb hanging from bare wires from the ceiling.

Mom is putting more water in the soup to make it last longer, and the kids with dirty faces are watching since they don't have a television yet alone video games to pay with.

Liberals have great imaginations.

Republicans don't have that good of imaginations though. We see things through experience like those food stamp people with a heaping cart of TV dinners, prepared drinks, and snacks. Mom is 300 lbs and has four kids with her. She pays for the food with food stamps, and then whips out a wad of cash for the huge bags of dog food, cat litter, cigarettes, wine, perfume and flowers.

Corporate welfare even pays, multimillion dollar bonuses.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

Why do conservatives contrive such ridiculous lies and inane fallacies.

 

[Hal-9000]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

Why do conservatives contrive such ridiculous lies and inane fallacies.

Why do dirt poor democrats pretend that they can afford higher taxes

 

[danielpalos]

End our warfare-State not our welfare-State. Only one is specifically enumerated.

 

[rightwinger]

Hey....I gotta great idea

Lets create more jobs and then we won't need as many people on food stamps and welfare
If people get jobs, they won't need it anymore

But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole

But there is good news...
We just cut corporate taxes in half so it looks like they can afford to pay their employees more. I also have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you

A 50% tax cut?

That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases

there is no right work, even in right to work States.

Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers

Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.

No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the pie

No more with "right to work"
Right to get paid like shit

 

[rightwinger]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Hey....I gotta great idea

Lets create more jobs and then we won't need as many people on food stamps and welfare
If people get jobs, they won't need it anymore

But it looks like even though we have millions of new jobs, pay has not increased. We have frozen minimum wage for the last 9 years and low skilled pay has been stagnant
So, even though more people have jobs, they do not pay well enough to get people off the dole

But there is good news...
We just cut corporate taxes in half so it looks like they can afford to pay their employees more. I also have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I can sell you

A 50% tax cut?

That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases

there is no right work, even in right to work States.

Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers

Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.

No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the pie

No more with "right to work"
Right to get paid like shit

Beats not getting paid at all.

 

[danielpalos]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?

current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.

 

[danielpalos]

A 50% tax cut?

That should trickle down with an end to welfare and food stamps
Companies can no longer claim they can't afford pay increases

there is no right work, even in right to work States.

Without unions, there is nothing to force companies to trickle down that profit to the workers

Correct, that's what unions used to do. They used so much force that they forced our work right out of the country.

No, they fought for the rights of workers and ensured they got their fair slice of the pie

No more with "right to work"
Right to get paid like shit

Beats not getting paid at all.

Wage slavery? Capitalists already have the social benefits of H1 visas, writing off certain labor costs, and requiring a work ethic in at-will employment States. Simple coercion and invalid on simple ethical grounds.

 

[Timmy]

Why do dems say excuses like "because they need help?"
You lying mother fuckers. What about generational welfare. Excess in shit they dont need. You are making CAREERS out fo this shit. How many people do you idiots actually think aqre against helping out someone that falls on hard times?
FFS, pelosi said welfare is good. ACA is good because lazy entitled hippies can have healthcare while they play the guitar in the downtown square for 30 bucks a day.
You lying partisan shitheads need to grow up.

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?

current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.

That is a lie . You don’t have any idea how welfare benefits work. Geez, that stuff changed back in bill Clinton days .

 

[TNHarley]

What about generational welfare?
Do you cut someone off because their parents were poor?

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?

current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.

That is a lie . You don’t have any idea how welfare benefits work. Geez, that stuff changed back in bill Clinton days .

Plesse link up thar more kids donr get you more welfare.
This should be good.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Why do democrats want more people on foodstamps and welfare

to remain dependent on the government by barely surviving on the handouts given

in much the same way they worked the Indian Reservations

 

[Timmy]

No, but if we had a regulation that nobody gets welfare unless they are fixed first, that would cut our welfare roles by 70% down the road.

Sounds like something Hitler would propose

Why is that? What do you think working people do when they have as many kids as they could afford to have?

current policy pays more when you have more kids. why lie to their stock holders if there is no multimillion dollar bonus in it.

That is a lie . You don’t have any idea how welfare benefits work. Geez, that stuff changed back in bill Clinton days .

Plesse link up thar more kids donr get you more welfare.
This should be good.

The TAFDC Family Cap Rule: Children's Issues Series | Mass Legal Services

The Family Cap rule means that you can get TAFDC for a child only if the child was already born or the mother was pregnant with the child when the family first started to get TAFDC. Families with a child subject to the Family Cap rule are denied about $100 in TAFDC each month

 

[Crixus]

Isn't it better for Americans to have jobs and self respect?

Democratic Party on Welfare & Poverty

How else do you control the slaves? Let them know you can shut off the food. That’s why the democrat party has spent so much time conditioning blacks to feed from their hands.

unlike the right wing with crony forms of capitalism?

Meh.