Why did the racist and misogynist left not vote for Kamala in the Dem primaries?

[elektra]

Why not go back to Andrew Johnson in 1866 that was the first Civil Rights Act proposed. Then Humbert Humphrey in 1948... Both preceding Ike. Since we are talking about the major legislation that passed the 1964 Act, that was Kennedy who proposed it, outlined it, and championed it.

Why, because we are talking about the civil rights act that began with Republican President Eisenhower which the democrats opposed until it was no longer popular to do so.

 

[Slade3200]

JFK was dead in 1964, dipshit.

Yup, and??

 

[HeyNorm]

They did vote for Kamala smart guy... She was on Bidens ticket. Try and think of something a little more creative

Biden got 81 million votes, far more than Harris. So the Dems appear WAY more likely to vote for an old White guy, than a young Black Woman.

You were saying?

 

[Slade3200]

Why, because we are talking about the civil rights act that began with Republican President Eisenhower which the democrats opposed until it was no longer popular to do so.

That was a different Civil rights Act. We are talking about the Act of 1964 that was started by JFK.

If the CRA of 1866 is irrelevant then so is the CRA of 1957... Cant have it both ways

 

[22lcidw]

Tulsi won't be the nominee. She's going to quickly sink into obscurity now that Trump is done with her.

I suspect Gavin Might be the leader for 2028, with Vance being the most likely to win the GOP nomination.

Of course, by then, Trump will so have tanked the Republican Brand, that probably won't help much.

Enacting legislation that caused high inflation and affected a good portion of the population is a gift that keeps on giving when we go to stores. We found out what Progs really are. Taxing the working class, the retirees, the working poor and the poor not privileged.

 

[Slade3200]

Biden got 81 million votes, far more than Harris. So the Dems appear WAY more likely to vote for an old White guy, than a young Black Woman.

You were saying?

Yup, thats how it played out... They were also opposition candidates during COVID and the public wasn't satisfied with the state of the economy once they gained power. So they lost a bunch of support. I seriously doubt Biden would have gotten close to 81 million had he stayed in the race.

 

[22lcidw]

The past is the past, nobody alive today minus a few in their final stages of life existed during those times. Just as you don't like being held responsible for those before us that allowed slavery in this country, you'd be a hypocrite to hold other responsible for the actions of those before them. Judge and engage with people based on who THEY are and how THEY act.

The old Progs still in power were around then. All of the money spent, and we should have gotten better value for the dollar.

 

[elektra]

That was a different Civil rights Act. We are talking about the Act of 1964 that was started by JFK.

If the CRA of 1866 is irrelevant then so is the CRA of 1957... Cant have it both ways

Yes, you are wrong. The Civil Rights acts, start in 1957 with the Republicans.

 

[JoeB131]

Biden got 81 million votes, far more than Harris. So the Dems appear WAY more likely to vote for an old White guy, than a young Black Woman.

You were saying?

Or they just weren't particularly motivated to show up.

Trump got 1 million votes more than he got in 2020, and Harris got 9 million less than Biden but there's probably about 4 million votes outstanding on the west cost that haven't been counted yet, so let's say for argument that those numbers are likely to break 2 million more for Trump and 7 million less for Harris.

Part of that is that states scaled back on vote by mail.
Part of that is that without the threat of Covid/Riots/Recessions, people were less motivated to vote if their lives depended on it.
A large part of that is probably because if you didn't live in one of the seven swing states, there really wasn't much point to voting.

It appears that slightly less white people voted for Trump, and black people were about the same. Where Trump made gains was with Hispanics and Asians, particularly men in both those demographics, which is understandable, they tend to be a lot more patriarchal.

 

[marvin martian]

Or they just weren't particularly motivated to show up.

Trump got 1 million votes more than he got in 2020, and Harris got 9 million less than Biden but there's probably about 4 million votes outstanding on the west cost that haven't been counted yet, so let's say for argument that those numbers are likely to break 2 million more for Trump and 7 million less for Harris.

Part of that is that states scaled back on vote by mail.
Part of that is that without the threat of Covid/Riots/Recessions, people were less motivated to vote if their lives depended on it.
A large part of that is probably because if you didn't live in one of the seven swing states, there really wasn't much point to voting.

It appears that slightly less white people voted for Trump, and black people were about the same. Where Trump made gains was with Hispanics and Asians, particularly men in both those demographics, which is understandable, they tend to be a lot more patriarchal.

So millions of your fellow demokkkrats stayed home instead of voting against Hitler? That's what you're going with?

 

[ColonelAngus]

81 million votes for Biden.

It will be about 8-9 million less votes for Kamala when all is said and done.

WHAT HAPPENED TO THOSE BIDEN VOTERS? WHERE DID THEY ALL GO?

 

[JoeB131]

So millions of your fellow demokkkrats stayed home instead of voting against Hitler? That's what you're going with?

No point in voting if your vote isn't going to count.

The real problem is that people couldn't get past their misogyny. Especially Asian and Hispanics, which is where Trump made his gains. Unfortunate, because these will be the two ethnicities hardest hit by Trump nativism and racism.

 

[22lcidw]

No point in voting if your vote isn't going to count.

The real problem is that people couldn't get past their misogyny. Especially Asian and Hispanics, which is where Trump made his gains. Unfortunate, because these will be the two ethnicities hardest hit by Trump nativism and racism.

View attachment 1040678

Joe loved us. Kamala loved us so much she did not even say what she was going to do. Inflation, the gift that keeps on giving. A wowser ph uk u from the Progressives.

 

[marvin martian]

No point in voting if your vote isn't going to count.

The real problem is that people couldn't get past their misogyny. Especially Asian and Hispanics, which is where Trump made his gains. Unfortunate, because these will be the two ethnicities hardest hit by Trump nativism and racism.

View attachment 1040678

Attacking minorities seems like a good strategy for you. Very neo-liberal.

 

[Lesh]

They voted for a white male over an Indian woman.

The only reason is RACISM AND MISOGYNY.

What does the left need to do to overcome their racism and misogyny?

If 2028 is Gavin vs Tulsi…the racist and misogynistic left will vote for the white man.

SO RACIST, SO MISOGYNISTIC.

DISGUSTING.

So your stupid contention is that Dems who didn’t come out to vote for Harris are misogynists and racists?

That makes all those 75 million who voted for Trump the same

Logic is not your friend

 

[JoeB131]

Joe loved us. Kamala loved us so much she did not even say what she was going to do. Inflation, the gift that keeps on giving. A wowser ph uk u from the Progressives.

Please get back on your meds.

So your stupid contention is that Dems who didn’t come out to vote for Harris are misogynists and racists?

That makes all those 75 million who voted for Trump the same

Logic is not your friend

Here's where I see the problem.

You can't actually blame white people for this one. Harris actually improved over Trump with white folks, doing +2 better with white men and +3 with white women.

Black folks. Trump did +1 better with black man and Harris did +2 better with black women.

Where the real failing came was with Hispanics and Asians. Trump did + 18% better with Hispanic men and + 7 better with Hispanic women. With Asians, he did +7 better.

And irony they will no doubt consider when Trump and Stephen Miller start deporting them.

 

[hadit]

Tulsi won't be the nominee. She's going to quickly sink into obscurity now that Trump is done with her.

I suspect Gavin Might be the leader for 2028, with Vance being the most likely to win the GOP nomination.

Of course, by then, Trump will so have tanked the Republican Brand, that probably won't help much.

I believe you thought he had already done that this year.

 

[Lesh]

Please get back on your meds.



Here's where I see the problem.

You can't actually blame white people for this one. Harris actually improved over Trump with white folks, doing +2 better with white men and +3 with white women.

Black folks. Trump did +1 better with black man and Harris did +2 better with black women.

Where the real failing came was with Hispanics and Asians. Trump did + 18% better with Hispanic men and + 8 better with Hispanic women. With Asians, he did +8 better.

Interesting. And baffling

 

[buckeye45_73]

No, he won one election against an opponent who had no time to organize a campaign. Barely. Buyer's remorse will set in by December.

LOL, you are an idiot. The democrats couped their own candidate because Trump was so far ahead. They panicked and got rid of the democrat elected candidate with someone no one voted for. And until the debate, you guys were pimping Biden as sharp as a tact and physically in great shape. More gaslighting and bullshit from you lefties.

 

[JoeB131]

Interesting. And baffling

I'm not sure if it is entirely.

Latin and Asian cultures tend to be more patriarchal than Western European cultures. So you can see why they might be less likely to support a woman (even though Harris did carry both groups)

As for race, I hate to say this, but Asians and, to a lesser degree, Hispanics see themselves as "better" than blacks. There is not solidarity among people of color.