PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
Let's begin with this question: what possible reason would the President have to allow WWII to go on an extra year or two???
1. There is no way to argue that one of these two possibilities is the truth:
a. either Franklin Roosevelt was entirely aligned with Stalin and the communist agenda...or
b. Joseph Stalin was brilliant and overwhelming in his manipulations of Roosevelt.
2. "But the USSR was our ally against Hitler! No. The USSR was not our ally. It was our secret master-manipulator. We were secretly master-manipulated, not into defeating the Nazis, who, but for the de facto Soviet occupation of Washington, I am now persuaded could have been eliminated in 1943, but rather into decimating,obliterating, Germany, Soviet Russia's natural barrier against expansion into its European empire. Japan, very much too, for that matter, in the East."
West, "American Betrayal," p.277
a. Based on Stalin's wishes.....any surrender by Germany would not be accepted until its potential as a barrier to the spread of communism was obliterated so that "...Soviet Russia's natural barrier against expansion into its European empire" was removed.
And the same applied to Stalin's view of Japan, a potential impediment to the East. After meeting with Stalin in Moscow on May 28, 1945, Harry Hopkins told Truman that Stalin "prefers to go through with unconditional surrender" regarding Japan. "However, he feels that if we stick to unconditional surrender the Japs will not give up and we will have to destroy them as we did Germany."
Sherwood, "Hopkins," volume 2, 892-893.
Not to forget, Harry Hopkins was Stalin's spy in the Roosevelt White House....he actually lived in the White House.....
Stalin demanded "unconditional surrender."
So.....Roosevelt acquiesced.
Would it not have been in America's interests to see the Nazis and Hitler destroyed earlier, with a surrender of German forces and territories???
Would not have thousands of American soldier's lives been saved?
What to say about Franklin Roosevelt if it can be shown that the offer was on the table....?
1. There is no way to argue that one of these two possibilities is the truth:
a. either Franklin Roosevelt was entirely aligned with Stalin and the communist agenda...or
b. Joseph Stalin was brilliant and overwhelming in his manipulations of Roosevelt.
2. "But the USSR was our ally against Hitler! No. The USSR was not our ally. It was our secret master-manipulator. We were secretly master-manipulated, not into defeating the Nazis, who, but for the de facto Soviet occupation of Washington, I am now persuaded could have been eliminated in 1943, but rather into decimating,obliterating, Germany, Soviet Russia's natural barrier against expansion into its European empire. Japan, very much too, for that matter, in the East."
West, "American Betrayal," p.277
a. Based on Stalin's wishes.....any surrender by Germany would not be accepted until its potential as a barrier to the spread of communism was obliterated so that "...Soviet Russia's natural barrier against expansion into its European empire" was removed.
And the same applied to Stalin's view of Japan, a potential impediment to the East. After meeting with Stalin in Moscow on May 28, 1945, Harry Hopkins told Truman that Stalin "prefers to go through with unconditional surrender" regarding Japan. "However, he feels that if we stick to unconditional surrender the Japs will not give up and we will have to destroy them as we did Germany."
Sherwood, "Hopkins," volume 2, 892-893.
Not to forget, Harry Hopkins was Stalin's spy in the Roosevelt White House....he actually lived in the White House.....
Stalin demanded "unconditional surrender."
So.....Roosevelt acquiesced.
Would it not have been in America's interests to see the Nazis and Hitler destroyed earlier, with a surrender of German forces and territories???
Would not have thousands of American soldier's lives been saved?
What to say about Franklin Roosevelt if it can be shown that the offer was on the table....?