Why did Crooks shoot Trump?

You know? When leftists use straw-men fallacies against me, to tell me what, I think, feel or know?

It is at that point I know they are desperate and have lost the argument. Thanks! :113:

It is a type of "mind-reading," fallacy. Not legit at all.



I'm always on the look out for argumentative fallacies to confirm to me, that person I am engaged with is out of arguments and suffering from cognitive biases.

One again, thanks for ending this discussion!
I'm not desperate at all. You claim rhetoric that uses a word, incites that word.

That's absurd.

I can't find a single link to a person calling for the elimination of either Harris, or walz.

I can link to over a dozen, from prominent politicians, doing exactly that with Trump.

I can't find a single repub declaring Harris or walz are a "threat to democracy". I can find links saying their policies are damaging to American culture, but saying them, as individuals, are threats to democracy?

No.

So it is you who are grasping at straw men.
 
ad42a726eb29c2c625c6f3dfc362c679




View attachment 1022938

When trump was told his words in J6 may cause violence, he responded...."Let them riot."

trump is a hollow shell of a human.
 
This is because, I am willing to bet, you ONLY view and read media with a right bias.
Oh no.............Mister Beale.....'yall done lost your bet.

If you only had watched MSLSD? You would have only seen or been informed of the violent rhetoric of the right.
Can't form a legitimate opinion without seeing and hearing what the 'other side' claims, pal.
Violent rhetoric is violent rhetoric.
Yet you post some BS about media bias which has absolutely nothing to do with violent rhetoric.
Most folks know it is against the law to threaten the POTUS or senior staff, so you won't find it.
Oh, really? Johnny Depp, Dinero 'punch him in the face'.....how many others, pal?
Either folks are too smart to do it, or it has been removed from public view when it happens.

Boogey men everywhere, dude.
 
You lie just like your orange master.
Hey, I'm willing to be educated.

I did a search, b/c I thought your statement was totally outrageous.

I couldn't find anywhere that he said it.

There might be rumors and folks saying he said that, but in politics, only dupes believe shit they can't see and hear with their own eyes and ears.
 
Hey, I'm willing to be educated.

I did a search, b/c I thought your statement was totally outrageous.

I couldn't find anywhere that he said it.

There might be rumors and folks saying he said that, but in politics, only dupes believe shit they can't see and hear with their own eyes and ears.
Pardon me, his statement was "Make them Riot."

 
Pardon me, his statement was "Make them Riot."


Damn, you will believe anything if it confirms your bias, won't you?

I TOLD YOU THAT THIS WAS THE CASE! I KNEW IT. . . folks telling these stories don't even want to be identified.

There might be rumors and folks saying he said that, but in politics, only dupes believe shit they can't see and hear with their own eyes and ears.

". . . On the other hand, the use of anonymous sources can also be seen as a way to skirt the truth or manipulate the public. This can be particularly true when the anonymous source is providing information that is unsubstantiated or biased.

In such cases, the use of an anonymous source can be seen as unethical and potentially damaging to the credibility of the journalist.

Ultimately, the decision to use anonymous sources should be based on careful consideration of the potential risks and rewards.. . . "


1728413252773.webp


On top of that. . . your source did not even say it was Trump that said, "let them riot," IT WAS A “campaign operative!”

Can't you even critically read your own damn source?

". . . In another instance, an unidentified Trump aide, described only as a “campaign operative,” was told by a colleague at a Detroit, MI vote counting center that they thought a batch of ballots would be in Biden’s favor, the operative said to “find a reason it isn’t.” “When the colleague suggested that there was about to be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers riot, a violent effort to stop the vote count in Florida after the 2000 presidential election,” the campaign operative “responded, ‘Make them riot!’ and ‘Do it!'”

wtf. The only liar here, is YOU.
 
Damn, you will believe anything if it confirms your bias, won't you?

I TOLD YOU THAT THIS WAS THE CASE! I KNEW IT. . . folks telling these stories don't even want to be identified.



". . . On the other hand, the use of anonymous sources can also be seen as a way to skirt the truth or manipulate the public. This can be particularly true when the anonymous source is providing information that is unsubstantiated or biased.

In such cases, the use of an anonymous source can be seen as unethical and potentially damaging to the credibility of the journalist.

Ultimately, the decision to use anonymous sources should be based on careful consideration of the potential risks and rewards.. . . "


View attachment 1023795

On top of that. . . your source did not even say it was Trump that said, "let them riot," IT WAS A “campaign operative!”

Can't you even critically read your own damn source?

". . . In another instance, an unidentified Trump aide, described only as a “campaign operative,” was told by a colleague at a Detroit, MI vote counting center that they thought a batch of ballots would be in Biden’s favor, the operative said to “find a reason it isn’t.” “When the colleague suggested that there was about to be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers riot, a violent effort to stop the vote count in Florida after the 2000 presidential election,” the campaign operative “responded, ‘Make them riot!’ and ‘Do it!'”

wtf. The only liar here, is YOU.
The fact that your only defense it to cast blanket, mindless doubt on the source kind of says it all.
 
The fact that your only defense it to cast blanket, mindless doubt on the source kind of says it all.
Wow, you are as bad as he is.

I posted why anonymous sources can't be relied on to give us accurate news or reporting. . . . .

AND SECOND, that his OWN SOURCE, the content of the article was claiming that a campaign operative said it. NOT TRUMP.

campaign operative “responded, ‘Make them riot!’ and ‘Do it!'”
 
Back
Top Bottom