- Sep 16, 2012
- 67,140
- 63,008
- 3,605
No matter how many times you repeat a falsehood, that doesn't make it any more true.Crooks was a disillusioned Trumper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No matter how many times you repeat a falsehood, that doesn't make it any more true.Crooks was a disillusioned Trumper.
I'm not desperate at all. You claim rhetoric that uses a word, incites that word.You know? When leftists use straw-men fallacies against me, to tell me what, I think, feel or know?
It is at that point I know they are desperate and have lost the argument. Thanks!
It is a type of "mind-reading," fallacy. Not legit at all.
Mind projection fallacy - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
![]()
Mindreading as a fallacy
I've seen this bad argument a number of times, but can't find a fallacy listed anywhere that really fits it. That is, claiming to know (with weak or no evidence) the thoughts/feelings/motivations of another person, and using them to support or show ...www.logicallyfallacious.com
I'm always on the look out for argumentative fallacies to confirm to me, that person I am engaged with is out of arguments and suffering from cognitive biases.
One again, thanks for ending this discussion!
Millions of Trumpers are waking up.No matter how many times you repeat a falsehood, that doesn't make it any more true.
Millions of Trumpers are waking up.
Trump will not be allowed to be victorious.To a coming victory.
Trump will not be allowed to be victorious.
Trump will lose again. Get used to itDescribe that.
He was a target of opportunity kinda guy........deal with it.The would be assassin Crooks was one of yours. Deal with it
Trump will lose again. Get used to it
Oh no.............Mister Beale.....'yall done lost your bet.This is because, I am willing to bet, you ONLY view and read media with a right bias.
Can't form a legitimate opinion without seeing and hearing what the 'other side' claims, pal.If you only had watched MSLSD? You would have only seen or been informed of the violent rhetoric of the right.
Yet you post some BS about media bias which has absolutely nothing to do with violent rhetoric.Violent rhetoric is violent rhetoric.
Oh, really? Johnny Depp, Dinero 'punch him in the face'.....how many others, pal?Most folks know it is against the law to threaten the POTUS or senior staff, so you won't find it.
Either folks are too smart to do it, or it has been removed from public view when it happens.
he responded...."Let them riot."
You lie just like your orange master.
Hey, I'm willing to be educated.You lie just like your orange master.
Pardon me, his statement was "Make them Riot."Hey, I'm willing to be educated.
I did a search, b/c I thought your statement was totally outrageous.
I couldn't find anywhere that he said it.
There might be rumors and folks saying he said that, but in politics, only dupes believe shit they can't see and hear with their own eyes and ears.
There might be rumors and folks saying he said that, but in politics, only dupes believe shit they can't see and hear with their own eyes and ears.
The fact that your only defense it to cast blanket, mindless doubt on the source kind of says it all.Damn, you will believe anything if it confirms your bias, won't you?
I TOLD YOU THAT THIS WAS THE CASE! I KNEW IT. . . folks telling these stories don't even want to be identified.
". . . On the other hand, the use of anonymous sources can also be seen as a way to skirt the truth or manipulate the public. This can be particularly true when the anonymous source is providing information that is unsubstantiated or biased.
In such cases, the use of an anonymous source can be seen as unethical and potentially damaging to the credibility of the journalist.
Ultimately, the decision to use anonymous sources should be based on careful consideration of the potential risks and rewards.. . . "
![]()
What Are The Ethics Of Using Anonymous Sources And How Do Journalists Decide When To Use Them? - CPI Journalism - All About Journalism
As an experienced journalist, I've spent many years exploring the complex and often contentious ethical considerations of utilizing anonymous sources.cpijournalism.org
View attachment 1023795
Telling the Story | The Associated Press
www.ap.org
On top of that. . . your source did not even say it was Trump that said, "let them riot," IT WAS A “campaign operative!”
Can't you even critically read your own damn source?
". . . In another instance, an unidentified Trump aide, described only as a “campaign operative,” was told by a colleague at a Detroit, MI vote counting center that they thought a batch of ballots would be in Biden’s favor, the operative said to “find a reason it isn’t.” “When the colleague suggested that there was about to be unrest reminiscent of the Brooks Brothers riot, a violent effort to stop the vote count in Florida after the 2000 presidential election,” the campaign operative “responded, ‘Make them riot!’ and ‘Do it!'”
wtf. The only liar here, is YOU.
Wow, you are as bad as he is.The fact that your only defense it to cast blanket, mindless doubt on the source kind of says it all.