Why couldnt US plant WMDs in Iraq?

[whitehall]

Bill Clinton said there were WMD's in Iraq. Of course he didn't do anything about it but it was the general opinion a couple of years before the invasion that Saddam was developing WMD's. Left wing CIA bureaucrats muddied the water later on with the "yellow cake" controversy but Britan sticks by the original story. If Bush made any mistakes early on it was not firing every bloated bureaucrat in the joke of a "central intelligence agency" and starting over.

 

[rdean]

Bill Clinton said there were WMD's in Iraq. Of course he didn't do anything about it but it was the general opinion a couple of years before the invasion that Saddam was developing WMD's. Left wing CIA bureaucrats muddied the water later on with the "yellow cake" controversy but Britan sticks by the original story. If Bush made any mistakes early on it was not firing every bloated bureaucrat in the joke of a "central intelligence agency" and starting over.

Bush lied about not having a criminal record.

He told the American people Rumsfeld was staying when he knew he was telling a lie.

Bush lied so many times, it was natural for him.

But the Right insists it was the CIA, people who put their lives on the line every day for this country, that are a bunch of liars.

And after Iraq was defeated and under constant surveillance, they somehow, in secret were developing all these scary weapons? Is it because Republicans don't know enough about science that they can believe these far out "fantasies"? If they had these weapons, they would have used them against the first Bush.

 

[SFC Ollie]

rdean, read the fucking report. If there are parts you cannot comprehend I'll try to explain them to you. It's only been out there for a few years now, my bet is all you know about it is what you were told to know.

 

[eots]

So our government is SO EVIL AND WICKED...that it conspired 9-11 on it's on people, then couldn't pull a little WMD hoax in Iraq, the same place we sent weapons to in the 80s?

Our evil, conspiracy government sure is inconsistent.

OR.......it could be that pissed off Muslims did 9-11 and Saddam got rid of his WMD's. Either explanation makes sense I guess.

why take the risk,with international weapons inspectors involved...the goal was reached, clearly it completely unnecessary

 

[bucs90]

Bill Clinton said there were WMD's in Iraq. Of course he didn't do anything about it but it was the general opinion a couple of years before the invasion that Saddam was developing WMD's. Left wing CIA bureaucrats muddied the water later on with the "yellow cake" controversy but Britan sticks by the original story. If Bush made any mistakes early on it was not firing every bloated bureaucrat in the joke of a "central intelligence agency" and starting over.

Bush lied about not having a criminal record.

He told the American people Rumsfeld was staying when he knew he was telling a lie.

Bush lied so many times, it was natural for him.

But the Right insists it was the CIA, people who put their lives on the line every day for this country, that are a bunch of liars.

And after Iraq was defeated and under constant surveillance, they somehow, in secret were developing all these scary weapons? Is it because Republicans don't know enough about science that they can believe these far out "fantasies"? If they had these weapons, they would have used them against the first Bush.

Then how do you explain the Iraqi general who defected here after the invasion....and in his debriefing, spoke of the shock the Iraqi Army's top generals had when they were told they would not have WMD's for use vs the American invasion. Yep. The generals in Iraq's own Army thought they had them until Saddam said "OH, by the way....about them WMD's you wanna use....".

And are you also gonna call Obama's attacks on Libya and Pakistan a war crime?

 

[eots]

war crimes are being committed in Libya

 

[eots]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKX6luiMINQ]Bush Jokes about WMD - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Paulie]

war crimes are being committed in Libya

No they aren't, because it's happening on a Democrat president's watch.

 

[Jessica Blume]

With all the plots, conspiracies and scams the US is supposedly involved in, like 9-11, how can a nation so much evil and wickedness in its leaders......not find a way to plant some WMD's in Iraq? I mean....life would've been a lot smoother for Bush had he just done it. It would've been so easy. Hell, we coulda just claimed to have found a missing Russian nuke in Iraq, but we conveniently disabled it and dumped it in the ocean somewhere so no one could find it and use the technology!!! But not only did we not plant WMD's.....we wouldn't even make up a lie that we had found them???

Awfully hard to buy the 9-11 conspiracy while also buying the idea that the same folks couldn't plant some nerve gas in the desert of Baghdad.

They found the phosgene gas. What do you think killed all those birds and why John Wheeler was killed?

 

[Mr. Jones]

So our government is SO EVIL AND WICKED...that it conspired 9-11 on it's on people, then couldn't pull a little WMD hoax in Iraq, the same place we sent weapons to in the 80s?

Our evil, conspiracy government sure is inconsistent.

OR.......it could be that pissed off Muslims did 9-11 and Saddam got rid of his WMD's. Either explanation makes sense I guess.

Other than the 9/11 Commission Report being 100% accurate on all of the major facts, this alone is probably the one of the most significant flaws in twoofer "logic".

If the 9-11 commission report is so accurate then explain why the staff members have come out saying that it wasn't?
Relying on facts about how many wtc towers there were and what day it was as "major points" is stupid and deceiving.
It is plain ignorant to suggest the report was factual when important points about such as the NORAD officials changing their story is a very important detail.