I can understand being frightened of the future but who are we to decide what knowledge our descendants will need and what will be superfluous long after we are dead? In the end all you can do is to give them the broadest view of the world possible and hope they will make the right choices. One thing is certain: the pace of change is accelerating and educating Americans to find change a bewildering overwhelming process is grave disservice.
I would say that the most grave of disservice is to empower amoral children with knowledge and then blame religion for all our ills.
Religious types exercising secular power are their own worst enemy. The ability to question everything and accept nothing is a extraordinarily valuable skill these days. If this means that people are less willing to accept things on faith alone what we know as religion is an acceptable loss.
The Founding Fathers were horrified at how the Church of England controlled the pulpit in England. I'm sure they were equally as horrified as the history of Constantine adopting the Christian faith to conquer with and then subsequently setting up a state church that carried such injustices out as Inquisitions/Crusades, etc. Constantine was not even a Christian, he still worshiped the pagan gods, even though he was rumored to have converted on his death bed.
Christians I think learned long ago about the evil nature of politics and the state, and to avoid a theocracy. Christ even warned that his kingdom was not of this world, nor could be. Unfortunately, Islam has never learned this lesson. In fact, their religion demands religion be combined with the state due to Sharia law.
No, I'm not an advocate of theocracy, even though I'm sure you can find a Christian or two who are. I am just a voice of warning, just as Christ was to us.
So how does one keep a moral society without mandating a state religion? The US did a pretty good job for a while, the best example that I can think of.
But alas, when the morality of society is that of a jail house, all one can do is build a wall around it and hire a warden. This I think is why Left wingers, who are fascists, want to destroy the moral fiber of society. They know that it can only lead to authoritarianism.
Morals do not guarantee an ethical society. Most people are generally decent without the mysticism and afterlife threats and rewards.
Everyone has morals, even those behind bars.
The issue is, morals that lend to a civil society.
As a rule, we are all born with the Golden Rule, told to us by Christ. Do unto others as you would have them do to you. But we all violate this understood moral code even though we understand it. What is worse, society at times justifies it in various ways.
To prove my point, Hitler justified identity politics in targeting Jews because he said that they were "vermin". They were not our equals, thus, the Golden Rule does not apply. Likewise, slaves were understood by the state to be subhuman, or a glorified ape, thus the Golden Rule need not apply. And today, we see the same with the unborn. They are not human, they are a fetus, thus the Golden Rule need not apply.
The one commonality that all three have is, these mental gymnastics are done because of one thing, the love of money which is the root of all evil in the world today. The Jews had their gold taken as they were sent off to die, the slave owners were the wealthiest colonists and, without their wealth, probably could not have fought off England, and most women who have abortions today do so because of financial concerns.
What is humbling is, how our morality can be so easily manipulated by the state. Take slavery, for example. Before it was made illegal, the general consensus was that, although not ideal, it is OK. However, centuries after being made illegal, all are in agreement that it is immoral. Likewise, before Roe vs. Wade, the general consensus was that abortion was immoral. However, decades after being made legal, the general consensus has shifted to it being OK, although not ideal.
As the Bible states, we are sheeple in may ways when it comes to morality even with the innately given Golden Rule