How can they be my thoughts when it was many white girls telling me their thoughts you jackass?
Who said they said it out of ignorance? Obviously they had the experiences in order to be able to compare. Like I said in many of the cases the white women I banged were married to white guys. This has been going on since the days of slavery. Why do you think you white boys made it illegal for a white woman to marry a Black guy during the period of slavery?
You have it ass backwards.
Married white men were banging black women, either because they weren't satisfied with their wives and fell in love with that particular black woman, or because they were womanizers surrounded by women with no ability to legally or socially defend themselves that "didn't count" as cheating.The old saying that you "aren't a man until you split dark oak" didn't come from white men who preferred black women, it came from white men literally hitting puberty and making sexual advances on black females who "couldn't be raped" and who were effectively tests for having normal sexual relations with white females.
Anti-miscegenation laws existed mostly out of principle because America was founded as a white nation with seemingly temporary black slaves who would presumably be sent back to Africa eventually. The only white people who were actually scared of black people stealing their spouse were white women who literally watched as their husband kicked them out of bed because black slave women had nothing to lose and everything to gain by developing any kind of relationship they could with their masters or the master's sons.
You ******* idiot. Here is the proof. It specifically calls out white women.
Slavery and the Law in Virginia
1691 - Any white person married to a black or mulatto is banished and a systematic plan is established to capture "outlying slaves."
- If an outlying slave is killed while resisting capture, the owner receives financial compensation for the laborer.
- Partners in an interracial marriage cannot stay in the colony for more than three months after they married.
- A fine of 15 pounds sterling is levied on an English woman who gives birth to a mulatto child. The fine is to be paid within a month of the child’s birth. If a woman cannot pay the fine, she is to serve five years as an indentured servant. If the mother is an indentured servant, she faces an additional five years of servitude after the completion of her indenture.
- A mulatto child born to a white indentured servant will serve a 30-year indenture.
- A master must transport an emancipated slave out of Virginia within six months of receiving his or her freedom.
They were doing everything in their power to keep white women away from Black men.
You also do realize that this proves that white people were not in fact afraid of mixing at this time, right?
Just so I have this straight. Youre so stupid you think making a law against white women being with Black men proves that white boys were all for white women having sex with Black guys?
You are becoming more incoherent with each stupid post you make all because you are determined to revise history to make white proud men into some jealous cuckolds. It never happened.
At most you had some stupid English guys treat Irish women like crap and then they got angry because a completely humbled black male called her pretty or something.
But it did happen little boy.
At first, in the 1660s, the first laws in Virginia and Maryland regulating marriage between whites and blacks only pertained to the marriages of whites with black (and mulatto) slaves and indentured servants. In 1664, Maryland enacted a law which criminalized such marriages—the 1681 marriage of Irish-born
Nell Butler to an African slave was an early example of the application of this law.
Virginia (1691) was the first English colony in North America to pass a law forbidding free blacks and whites to intermarry, followed by Maryland in 1692. This was the first time in American history that a law was invented that restricted access to marriage partners solely on the basis of "race", not class or condition of servitude.
[7] Later these laws also spread to colonies in the
Thirteen Colonies with fewer slaves and free blacks, such as
Pennsylvania and
Massachusetts. Moreover, after the independence of the United States had been established, similar laws were enacted in territories and states which outlawed slavery.
At least three proposed constitutional amendments intended to bar
interracial marriage in the United States were introduced in Congress.
[21]
In 1871, Representative
Andrew King (
Democrat of
Missouri) was the first politician in
Congress to propose a constitutional amendment to make interracial marriage illegal nationwide. King proposed this amendment because he predicted (correctly, as the case of
Loving v. Virginia later demonstrated) that the
Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give equal
civil rights to the emancipated ex-slaves (the
Freedmen) as part of the process of
Reconstruction, would render laws against interracial marriage unconstitutional.
In December 1912 and January 1913, Representative
Seaborn Roddenbery (Democrat of
Georgia) again introduced a proposal in the
House of Representatives to insert a prohibition of miscegenation into the
US Constitution and thus create a nationwide ban on interracial marriage. According to the wording of the proposed amendment, "Intermarriage between negros or persons of color and Caucasians... within the United States... is forever prohibited." Roddenbery's proposal was more severe because it defined the racial boundary between whites and "persons of color" by applying the
one-drop rule. In his proposed amendment, anyone with "any trace of African or Negro blood" was banned from marrying a white spouse.
Roddenbery's proposed amendment was also a direct reaction to
African American heavyweight champion
Jack Johnson's marriages to white women, first to Etta Duryea and then to Lucille Cameron. In 1908, Johnson had become the first black boxing world champion, having beaten
Tommy Burns. After his victory, the search was on for a white boxer, a "Great White Hope", to beat Johnson. Those hopes were dashed in 1910, when Johnson beat former world champion
Jim Jeffries. This victory ignited race riots all over America as frustrated whites attacked celebrating African Americans.
[22] Johnson's marriages to and affairs with white women further infuriated white Americans. In his speech introducing his bill before the
United States Congress, Roddenbery compared the marriage of Johnson and Cameron to the enslavement of white women, and warned of future civil war that would ensue if interracial marriage was not made illegal nationwide:
No brutality, no infamy, no degradation in all the years of southern slavery, possessed such villainous character and such atrocious qualities as the provision of the laws of Illinois, Massachusetts, and other states which allow the marriage of the negro, Jack Johnson, to a woman of Caucasian strain. [applause]. Gentleman, I offer this resolution ... that the States of the Union may have an opportunity to ratify it. ...
Intermarriage between whites and blacks is repulsive and averse to every sentiment of pure American spirit. It is abhorrent and repugnant to the very principles of Saxon government. It is subversive of social peace. It is destructive of moral supremacy, and ultimately this slavery of white women to black beasts will bring this nation a conflict as fatal as ever reddened the soil of Virginia or crimsoned the mountain paths of Pennsylvania.
... Let us uproot and exterminate now this debasing, ultra-demoralizing, un-American and inhuman leprosy
— Congressional Record
, 62d. Congr., 3d. Sess., December 11, 1912, pp. 502–503
Anti-miscegenation laws in the United States - Wikipedia
