Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's totally stupid you can get very rich by a lot of exporting or by little exporting or by exporting and importing from different areas around your country you living standard depends on how great your industries are on the international and domestic market. You can't manipulate currency and get rich that were possible everybody would do itwrong!!! low export prices cause low wages and poverty. how domestic production is regulated and to what end is a different subject. Liberal govt might engineer low wages there too so everyone lives in poverty.you do get an advantage by devaluing your currency if you are less import dependent and more export dependent.
why is there an advantage??? If you export at low prices your wages then are low too. Low wages and poverty is an advantage?
Yes but like mentioned above, this results in poverty only in the absence of domestic production. This is why Asian living standards rise during Asian currency devaluation and in the same time western living standards fall with it.
No because domestic production is what determines your dependence on import. The more independent of import you are, the more freedom you have about the currency valuation and living standard.
Everybody does it. The bounds of it are country specific, and as explained above, export and import dependent. Some get rich on it, and some get poor on it.That's totally stupid you can get very rich by a lot of exporting or by little exporting or by exporting and importing from different areas around your country you living standard depends on how great your industries are on the international and domestic market. You can't manipulate currency and get rich that were possible everybody would do itwrong!!! low export prices cause low wages and poverty. how domestic production is regulated and to what end is a different subject. Liberal govt might engineer low wages there too so everyone lives in poverty.you do get an advantage by devaluing your currency if you are less import dependent and more export dependent.
why is there an advantage??? If you export at low prices your wages then are low too. Low wages and poverty is an advantage?
Yes but like mentioned above, this results in poverty only in the absence of domestic production. This is why Asian living standards rise during Asian currency devaluation and in the same time western living standards fall with it.
No because domestic production is what determines your dependence on import. The more independent of import you are, the more freedom you have about the currency valuation and living standard.
who gets rich, exactly, by manipulating their currency?????????Some get rich on it, and some get poor on it.
who gets rich, exactly, by manipulating their currency?????????Some get rich on it, and some get poor on it.
who gets rich, exactly, by manipulating their currency?????????Some get rich on it, and some get poor on it.
It depends which type of country you are. If you are a producer type of country, then the exporters get rich, and if you are a consumer/lender type of country, then the lenders get rich.
Why "make excuses and blame others"?The Jews and the rich divide up the little people to prevent them from asking questions about the financial system.
who gets rich, exactly, by manipulating their currency?????????Some get rich on it, and some get poor on it.
It depends which type of country you are. If you are a producer type of country, then the exporters get rich, and if you are a consumer/lender type of country, then the lenders get rich.
name a country the gets rich on currency manipulation???
Can you prove that your question is not a lie?Why "make excuses and blame others"?The Jews and the rich divide up the little people to prevent them from asking questions about the financial system.
Do You have any better solutions at potentially lower cost?Can you prove that your question is not a lie?Why "make excuses and blame others"?The Jews and the rich divide up the little people to prevent them from asking questions about the financial system.
It is a hard fact, that the number of country borders tripled after ww1, then tripled again after ww2. So the dividing of the little people is a hard fact.Do You have any better solutions at potentially lower cost?Can you prove that your question is not a lie?Why "make excuses and blame others"?The Jews and the rich divide up the little people to prevent them from asking questions about the financial system.
In other words, nothing but repeal; I got it , right winger.It is a hard fact, that the number of country borders tripled after ww1, then tripled again after ww2. So the dividing of the little people is a hard fact.Do You have any better solutions at potentially lower cost?Can you prove that your question is not a lie?Why "make excuses and blame others"?The Jews and the rich divide up the little people to prevent them from asking questions about the financial system.
We are divided in large part because we have 2 major political parties and both of them have put their power ahead of our well-being. Too many politicians have put their own careers before their ethics and integrity and the media are bought and paid for. Used to be (or so I thought) that journalism was an honorable profession; no more. And so here we are, the American public trying to make sense of all this and getting conflicting reports and analysis. Who do you trust? Nobody. We're not divided about that.
I really would like to know when all people in the US did all get along, every single one of them....It's a very serious question that puzzles many serious people. The answer is simple, but painful.
One could say that it started with Roe v. Wade. In basic terms, the acceptability of abortion was at stake, and resolution required action by the Peoples' representatives in Congress and/or the state legislatures. And some of them were working on the issue. Congress, of course, avoided the subject like Kryptonite. So the USSC foolishly took the issue on, and "legislated" an ambiguous and intellectually interesting framework, based on one justice's medical readings. And 44 years later we are still fighting about it.
But in a real way, the Court shoved the "Liberal" position down America's throat. The majority of Americans, then and now, believe that abortion is morally evil, perhaps the taking of a human life, but "we" have never actually been heard on the subject.
Consider the death penalty. A strong majority of the American population would support a REAL death penalty - one by which our most egregious criminals could be convicted and promptly dispatched. But the Left has, by manipulation of the courts and the entire criminal justice system, made the DP so difficult, time consuming, and futile, that most people have given up on the issue.
Gay "marriage"? Strong majorities in virtually every state wanted no part of this new institution. But the courts (Leftist jurists) snatched the issue out of the hands of the Peoples' representatives, finding a preposterous right to marry someone of the same gender in the Constitution!
Public benefits and "Constitutional" rights for illegals? Done by Leftist courts with zero support from either the People or the legislatures. U.S Courts have for years been thwarting every effort to take our own immigration laws seriously, in the name of protecting their so-called "Constitutional" rights!
Are you picking up the pattern here? The Left in this country has for many decades been implementing it's broad agenda through anti-Constitutional means, perpetually lacking majority support, or sufficient strength in the legislatures to implement their desired agenda.
Look at how the "global warming agenda" has been thrust down our collective throat. The EPA, with no congressional authorization whatever, declares that CO2 is a "harmful pollutant." Thus an agency GIVES ITSELF the power to impose crippling regulations on industry, transportation, and power generation. When did the American people or their representatives have a chance to vote on this monumental development?
The list goes on and on. The Left feels positively ENTITLED to continue implementing it's agenda through extra - Constitutional means, and those of us who believe in the Constitution and the rule of law are supposed to accept it without complaint.
Yeah, we are pissed at the Left, and that is not going to change anytime soon,
Here is what I from the Left say; Fuck you whiny little Appomattox Surrender Monkeys ...you ain't gonna make a come backYeah, we are pissed at the Left, and that is not going to change anytime soon,
Elections have consequences and so does losing a war...It's silly to think the status quo would be the same forever in the future when those oppressed gained power to change the social structure of a society.Here is what I from the Left say; Fuck you whiny little Appomattox Surrender Monkeys ...you ain't gonna make a come backYeah, we are pissed at the Left, and that is not going to change anytime soon,
We are divided along ideological lines only because one half of that divide accepts facts and the other half does not.
LOLWe are divided along ideological lines only because one half of that divide accepts facts and the other half does not.
/close thread
We have a winner!
How ironic, it was posted by a libtard.
