Why Are The Two Jims Giving Bannon A Free Pass On Epstein?

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
138,680
Reaction score
90,338
Points
2,605
No one was closer or on friendlier terms with Jeff Epstein at the end than Steve Bannon. The PedoFiles are chock full of text messages between the two, and photos of the two in each other's company.

Not just a couple. A LOT.

Even worse, Steve-oh was working on a hagiography of his buddy Jeff right up to the end. This film was supposed to enable the pedophile to make a political comeback.

A lot of hay has been made of Bill Clinton in a hot tub. Big deal. In the minds of CDS sufferers (the OG's of derangements), this somehow means Clinton traveled to Epstein's Island eleventy-nine times and humped little girls, none of which is true.

Here we have Bannon actually cuddled up close to Epstein all the way to the end. Here we have Bannon working hard to reconstruct Epstein as a great guy.

Why have Jim Jordan and Jim Comer not subpoenaed the man who was closest to Epstein at the very end? Why have they not subpoenaed the film?


Steve Bannon Was Epstein’s Comeback Consultant. Where’s the Uproar?​

 
Q: Why won't a shark eat a lawyer?

A: Professional courtesy.

It's an old joke but one which comes to mind when I ponder why Jim Jordan is not demanding Steve Bannon appear before him.

Perhaps because Jordan allowed the wrestling coach at his college to molest 177 underaged boys and did nothing to stop it.

Professional courtesy.

 
EPSTEIN: how does it feel to have the most highly paid travel agent in history

BANNON: U r pretty good asst

EPSTEIN:
Massages. Not Included.

As we all know, Epstein's predatory M.O. was to have his victims give him a massage.

Why did Epstein know that text would amuse Bannon?

Time for a subpoena.


EPSTEIN: Btw Im in New York tonite thru sat , if you want to visit under the cover of darkness or breakfast tomorrow if you like.

BANNON: Do u have access that's not the front door-- they have 24/7 surveillance on us.



Bannon directed to sneak into Epstein's house. Epstein and Bannon both knew they were under surveillance. "They" are watching. "On us". You gotta be pretty close to someone to say "us" being under surveillance.

Who is "they"? Why is Bannon sneaking into the home of someone being watched?

For the conspiracy theorists, did "they" kill Epstein?

This raises a LOT of questions.

Time for a subpoena.

Why is Bannon getting a free pass?

If you aren't even the slightest bit curious about that, then you are a die-hard cultist.
 
No one was closer or on friendlier terms with Jeff Epstein at the end than Steve Bannon. The PedoFiles are chock full of text messages between the two, and photos of the two in each other's company.

Not just a couple. A LOT.

Even worse, Steve-oh was working on a hagiography of his buddy Jeff right up to the end. This film was supposed to enable the pedophile to make a political comeback.

A lot of hay has been made of Bill Clinton in a hot tub. Big deal. In the minds of CDS sufferers (the OG's of derangements), this somehow means Clinton traveled to Epstein's Island eleventy-nine times and humped little girls, none of which is true.

Here we have Bannon actually cuddled up close to Epstein all the way to the end. Here we have Bannon working hard to reconstruct Epstein as a great guy.

Why have Jim Jordan and Jim Comer not subpoenaed the man who was closest to Epstein at the very end? Why have they not subpoenaed the film?

Steve Bannon Was Epstein’s Comeback Consultant. Where’s the Uproar?



Fry em all, as long as we fry those from both sides
 
Fry em all, as long as we fry those from both sides
We clearly are not frying both sides. Thus the reason for this topic.

We also see Trump's DOJ has been redacting names to protect certain people. Billionaires and such.

Trump is still up to his old tricks.

The Two Jims have always been little monkeys performing for their master.

Jim Comer is one of the dumbest members of Congress, and that really takes some doing!
 
No one was closer or on friendlier terms with Jeff Epstein at the end than Steve Bannon. The PedoFiles are chock full of text messages between the two, and photos of the two in each other's company.

Not just a couple. A LOT.

Even worse, Steve-oh was working on a hagiography of his buddy Jeff right up to the end. This film was supposed to enable the pedophile to make a political comeback.

A lot of hay has been made of Bill Clinton in a hot tub. Big deal. In the minds of CDS sufferers (the OG's of derangements), this somehow means Clinton traveled to Epstein's Island eleventy-nine times and humped little girls, none of which is true.

Here we have Bannon actually cuddled up close to Epstein all the way to the end. Here we have Bannon working hard to reconstruct Epstein as a great guy.

Why have Jim Jordan and Jim Comer not subpoenaed the man who was closest to Epstein at the very end? Why have they not subpoenaed the film?

Steve Bannon Was Epstein’s Comeback Consultant. Where’s the Uproar?


Why would any non-retard be in an uproar? That's not reasonable.

Steve Bannon is a PR guy. That's his ******* job.

Are you going to get in an uproar at the guy at Burger King who served him a hamburger too? Or the mailman for delivering his mail?

How did you get so ******* stupid?
 
Last edited:
Why would any non-retard be in an uproar? That's not reasonable.

Steve Bannon is a PR guy. That's his ******* job.

Are you going to get in an uproar at the guy at Burger King who served him a hamburger too? Or the mailman for delivering his mail?

How did you get so ******* stupid?
And Bannon is also a public figure with a reputation.
Bannon either sold his soul, or had to truly believe in Epstein.
 
We clearly are not frying both sides. Thus the reason for this topic.

We also see Trump's DOJ has been redacting names to protect certain people. Billionaires and such.

Trump is still up to his old tricks.

The Two Jims have always been little monkeys performing for their master.

Jim Comer is one of the dumbest members of Congress, and that really takes some doing!
See this is what I don’t understand. My post was a statement to say “yeah, let’s go after all of them, regardless of party”. I would think that should have been responded to with “yes, I agree”, but someone people managed to make an argument against it.

So you don’t want people on both sides who are implicated to face justice?
 
What crime is Bannon accused of? Knowing and associating with Epstein is not a crime in and of itself.
You should rather ask, how many felonies has Bannon already been convicted of.

On August 20, 2020, a federal grand jury indictment was unsealed against Bannon and three others, charging them with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.

August 2022, Bannon was indicted on New York state charges of money laundering, conspiracy and fraud related to the $25 million "We Build the Wall" scheme

He was indicted by a federal grand jury on November 12, 2021, on two criminal contempt charges: one count of not providing documents, and one count of not testifying
 
Bannon is just gross. I mean, look at him. He’s a crusty turd. No-one would want to sit next to him at the dinner table. Would anyone really be surprised if he was a p*do? He is the archetype.
 
Yet it's the republicans who keep throwing water on the fire.
I'm not so sure that has as much to do with what they really bleev, as it does about them selling their souls and integrity just to stay in power.


I was stunned, amazed that folks that support the left kept denying what was going on with Biden's decline, very disappointed indeed, but they did that for the same reason the right is cooperating with the stonewalling right now. . . . desperate to stay in power.

And just as those of us who have intelligence & integrity were gratified to see all of you folks look like fools at the Trump/Biden debate, it will be just as gratifying to see the super-MAGA folks look like filthy slime balls for selling out our young citizens to this same cabal.
 
Birds of a feather OP, birds. of. a feather.
 
15th post
No one was closer or on friendlier terms with Jeff Epstein at the end than Steve Bannon.
That's pretty fuckin' stupid lie.

c-gettyimages-181355194.jpg
 
Last edited:
No one was closer or on friendlier terms with Jeff Epstein at the end than Steve Bannon. The PedoFiles are chock full of text messages between the two, and photos of the two in each other's company.

Not just a couple. A LOT.

Even worse, Steve-oh was working on a hagiography of his buddy Jeff right up to the end. This film was supposed to enable the pedophile to make a political comeback.

A lot of hay has been made of Bill Clinton in a hot tub. Big deal. In the minds of CDS sufferers (the OG's of derangements), this somehow means Clinton traveled to Epstein's Island eleventy-nine times and humped little girls, none of which is true.

Here we have Bannon actually cuddled up close to Epstein all the way to the end. Here we have Bannon working hard to reconstruct Epstein as a great guy.
Was he being paid?

Because that would really be a scandal for someone to be paid to improve a public figure's immage!

:twirl:
Why have Jim Jordan and Jim Comer not subpoenaed the man who was closest to Epstein at the very end? Why have they not subpoenaed the film?

Steve Bannon Was Epstein’s Comeback Consultant. Where’s the Uproar?


The exact same reason that the Democrats never called him to talk about the Epstein Files when they had control of both houses.
 
Back
Top Bottom