Why are democrats labeled violent when we decide to fight back?

[jon_berzerk]

I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485

View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????

View attachment 145490View attachment 145489

Do you have a link to any of that being true?

too bad he posted pictures of national SOCIALISTS

--LOL

 

[Asclepias]

If the Moors hadnt come and educated europeans they would still be afraid of water and hate taking baths. europeans were on their way back to neanderthal status. You should be celebrating what they brought to europe instead of accusing them of what whites have done.

Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centutharies before the European slave trade.

Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?

And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.

That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expected it to be called what it was called before whites could talk.

Are you embarrassed because I corrected you or are you deflecting? You claimed they werent Black but they said themselves that they were Black. That was the point..

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

 

[Asclepias]

Whats a sub saharan african? You dont really believe that white fantasy term still do you?

By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.

Whos writing? Why did Egyptians specifically call the interior of Africa "the land of gods" and say they came from there? Why did they orient Africa as the top of the world which is exactly the opposite of europe?

The romans, greeks, hittites amongst others speak of the egyptians as being a distinctly different people from the nubian kingdoms.

OK, I give up why did the egyptians call it the land of the gods? Why do the native peoples of australia consider Ayers Rock sacred? Why do the Hopi of the US talk about the ant people that came from the sky? As far orienting maps, how do you think the ancient chinese oriented their maps? With China at the center?

The Romans and Greeks also said the Egyptians were Blacks. The term used by Herodotus was "melachrinos". If they were white he would have used leucochroes. Had they been simply brown, like so many African Americans, he may have used phrenychroes. The Nubians ruled Egypt off and on throughout Egypts history. They were the same people racially and came from the same background.

"the people of Colchis must be Egyptians because like them they are black-skinned and wooly-haired." (History, Book II.)
-Herodotus

Does that ring a bell? Sounds like the description of god out of the bible.

It wasnt just Herodotus. Aristotle, Lucian, Apollodorus, Achilles, Tacitus, Strabo, Diodorus of Sicily, Digenes Laertius and Aminianus Marcellinus all concurred they were Black men. If you need some more quotes please let me know.

They called it the land of gods because thats where they came from and recognized their ancestors came from the interior of Africa using the Nile to populate the area as it flowed towards europe. I'm guessing you werent aware of that either were you?

Unfortunately for history revisionists; DNA doesn't lie...
Were the Ancient Egyptians Black or White? Scientists Now Know

The ancient Egyptians were not negroes. In fact only toward to end of the empires age can Subsaharan African DNA be found in any meaningful quantity. Likely a result of the long time use of negroes as slaves by the egyptians.

From the article... "
Modern Egyptians share 8% of their genome with central Africans, far more than ancient ones, according to the study, published in the journal Nature Communications. The influx of Sub-Saharan genes only occurred within the last 1,500 years."
8%... Thats today... So your fanciful notions of moors being negroes is fantasy as well. The movie Robin Hood Prince of Thieves, and a Micheal Jackson video, are not the best places for you to learn your "history".

Modern Egyptians are invaders not the original people you moron.

Read it and weep.

The King Tut Gene - DNA Consultants

"Tutankhamun (also spelled Tutenkhamen) is the most famous of all pharaohs. He was the son and successor of Akhenaten, grandson of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and great-grandson of the royal matriarch Queen Thuya. Archeologist Howard Carter’s opening of his intact tomb in the Valley of the Kings in 1922 ranks among the most splendid discoveries of history. In 2010, genetic fingerprinting of his mummy determined that he died at the early age of 19 as the result of violence or an accident to which the incestuous relationship of his parents and several genetic defects contributed. Tutankhamun actually carries a “double dose” of the allele named for him. Like most of the other genes in the family, it is Central African in ancient origin, but unlike the other markers it has a sparse distribution outside Africa with a worldwide average frequency of 4%. Still, Africans and African-influenced populations (1 in about 10) are about twice or three times as likely to have it as non-Africans."

http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf

 

[Asclepias]

Additionally... Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry

Then its a simple matter of delving into the past, and finding the roots of the middle eastern people. Science once again trumps wishful thinking, and self pitying history revisionism...

Note the date retard in your own article.

"The study, published on 30 May in Nature Communications1, includes data from 90 mummies buried between 1380 bc, during Egypt’s New Kingdom, and ad 425, in the Roman era. "

This was when Egypt was overrun by white invaders. How could you be so dumb?

 

[IsaacNewton]

I'm not trying to spark a fight here, so I want to make that clear...but why is it, when liberals reach a limit and decide to fight back, suddenly we're equated with the Klan and white supremist? For 8 long years under Obama, the attacks against liberals were constant and on going. Each campaign season rendered even more attacks....conservatives calling him everything from the anti christ to a Kenya jungle shooter. Liberals were marginalized on all ends and silenced by the right wing media.

Violent, police brutality spiked and mass shootings became the norm. All right wing approved. fast foward to 2016...Trump comes along and the violence only intensifies. At what point does a liberal say enough is enough?View attachment 145485

View attachment 145487View attachment 145486

One more time, at what point does liberals say enough is enough.
During the Obama years, the same white trash starting shit, again, when is enough enough?????

View attachment 145490View attachment 145489

You answered the question yourself. The key word is 'labelled'. Putting a negative label on other people allows them to be hated without feeling bad about it. Jews were labelled vermin in 1930s Germany. Cons today like the word 'antifa' because they don't have to say the words anti-fascist, which would destroy any negative thing they want to say about this group. The 'N' word is another label used to demean people and put them in a specific box. Fascist regimes and fascist leaning groups and sub-groups find labels to dehumanize their opponents.

 

[Conservative65]

Because the inbreds would rather their opposition be non violent so they can spit and punch on their objects of hatred like back in the 60's.

Since 75% of your kind are born bastards today, I'd say the inbred goes to them.

 

[Vastator]

By virtually all evidence of ancient writing peoples like the Egyptians, Arabs and black africans were distinctly different peoples. As with all peoples none pure but different culturally and ethnically.

Whos writing? Why did Egyptians specifically call the interior of Africa "the land of gods" and say they came from there? Why did they orient Africa as the top of the world which is exactly the opposite of europe?

The romans, greeks, hittites amongst others speak of the egyptians as being a distinctly different people from the nubian kingdoms.

OK, I give up why did the egyptians call it the land of the gods? Why do the native peoples of australia consider Ayers Rock sacred? Why do the Hopi of the US talk about the ant people that came from the sky? As far orienting maps, how do you think the ancient chinese oriented their maps? With China at the center?

The Romans and Greeks also said the Egyptians were Blacks. The term used by Herodotus was "melachrinos". If they were white he would have used leucochroes. Had they been simply brown, like so many African Americans, he may have used phrenychroes. The Nubians ruled Egypt off and on throughout Egypts history. They were the same people racially and came from the same background.

"the people of Colchis must be Egyptians because like them they are black-skinned and wooly-haired." (History, Book II.)
-Herodotus

Does that ring a bell? Sounds like the description of god out of the bible.

It wasnt just Herodotus. Aristotle, Lucian, Apollodorus, Achilles, Tacitus, Strabo, Diodorus of Sicily, Digenes Laertius and Aminianus Marcellinus all concurred they were Black men. If you need some more quotes please let me know.

They called it the land of gods because thats where they came from and recognized their ancestors came from the interior of Africa using the Nile to populate the area as it flowed towards europe. I'm guessing you werent aware of that either were you?

Unfortunately for history revisionists; DNA doesn't lie...
Were the Ancient Egyptians Black or White? Scientists Now Know

The ancient Egyptians were not negroes. In fact only toward to end of the empires age can Subsaharan African DNA be found in any meaningful quantity. Likely a result of the long time use of negroes as slaves by the egyptians.

From the article... "
Modern Egyptians share 8% of their genome with central Africans, far more than ancient ones, according to the study, published in the journal Nature Communications. The influx of Sub-Saharan genes only occurred within the last 1,500 years."
8%... Thats today... So your fanciful notions of moors being negroes is fantasy as well. The movie Robin Hood Prince of Thieves, and a Micheal Jackson video, are not the best places for you to learn your "history".

Modern Egyptians are invaders not the original people you moron.

Read it and weep.

The King Tut Gene - DNA Consultants

"Tutankhamun (also spelled Tutenkhamen) is the most famous of all pharaohs. He was the son and successor of Akhenaten, grandson of Amenhotep III and Queen Tiye and great-grandson of the royal matriarch Queen Thuya. Archeologist Howard Carter’s opening of his intact tomb in the Valley of the Kings in 1922 ranks among the most splendid discoveries of history. In 2010, genetic fingerprinting of his mummy determined that he died at the early age of 19 as the result of violence or an accident to which the incestuous relationship of his parents and several genetic defects contributed. Tutankhamun actually carries a “double dose” of the allele named for him. Like most of the other genes in the family, it is Central African in ancient origin, but unlike the other markers it has a sparse distribution outside Africa with a worldwide average frequency of 4%. Still, Africans and African-influenced populations (1 in about 10) are about twice or three times as likely to have it as non-Africans."

http://www.dnatribes.com/dnatribes-digest-2013-02-01.pdf

Lol... Your using Lucas for reference? Whose company offered the most basic, and shallow DNA testing availaible. Autosomal. With Autosomal testing you'd find half tbe world related to King Tut. Its the generic nature of the testing. Theres a reason his magazine, and company faltered, then failed after he died. You fail.

The Egyptian population remains largely unchanged since the neolithic.

A Predominantly Neolithic Origin for Y-Chromosomal DNA Variation in North Africa

 

[Vastator]

Yeah and if the muslims hadn't conquered Jews and Christians they would never have accomplished anything. Try doing a little research into the claims made by muslims, more often than not the individuals acknowledged were people captured and forced to convert.

I'm of Slavic descent I know what the muhammadens brought, slaughter, rape and enslavement. The Turks were finally driven out of Eastern Europe in 1912. So save the holier than thou nonsense. Hell Islamic slavery of black africans dwarfs the european, predates it by 4-5-600 years. You could still buy a black slave in a public market in Mecca up until 1963. Africans were taking white slaves as far north as Ireland many centutharies before the European slave trade.

Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?

And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.

That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

 

[AsianTrumpSupporter]

Fight back against what?

 

[Asclepias]

Its not claims made by muslims. Its historical fact. Take a trip to spain where it all started and see what the Moors taught europeans. This was the only time in europe where there was religious freedom.

I'm guessing you dont realize that your Slavic descent is where the word slave came from because you were enslaved by other whites?

And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.

That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

 

[Vastator]

Read some real science, from reputable scientists for ***** sake...

"Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians"

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry

 

[Asclepias]

Because the inbreds would rather their opposition be non violent so they can spit and punch on their objects of hatred like back in the 60's.

Since 75% of your kind are born bastards today, I'd say the inbred goes to them.

Bastard doesnt mean inbred cave monkey. Do you own a dictionary?

 

[Vastator]

And most of that knowledge was acquired by conquering christians and jews in the middle east and peoples in asia. We see these claims all the time. I just read something on the subject of the concept of zero in mathematics, claimed by islam, even though there is evidence of the concept centuries before in parts of india that were conquered by muslims. That's like europeans claiming credit for corn farming after they had overwhelmed the native americans.

Besides the moors are one, how about the persians, carthaginians, huns, turks, mongols?

As far as the roots of the word slave, I'm quite aware of the origins. Just like I'm aware of the word abeed, still commonly used in arab culture. And by the way europeans didn't go to africa and "take" slaves, for the most part they bought them from black africans.

That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

 

[Asclepias]

Read some real science, from reputable scientists for ***** sake...

"Both types of genomic material showed that ancient Egyptians shared little DNA with modern sub-Saharan Africans. Instead, their closest relatives were people living during the Neolithic and Bronze ages in an area known as the Levant. Strikingly, the mummies were more closely related to ancient Europeans and Anatolians than to modern Egyptians"

Mummy DNA unravels ancient Egyptians’ ancestry

If something says "sub saharan" by definition its not real science. Who do you think I am going to give more credibility to? The Egyptians themselves and the Greeks before they begin to lie like other whites, or some BS "scientist" that uses the term sub-saharan like there was some electric fence that kept Black people out of N. Africa?

 

[Asclepias]

That knowledge was taught to the christians and Jews and there is no such thing as the ME. Thats a white boy term like sub saharan trying to remove that area from what was considered by the Greeks and Africans as Africa or "Ethiopia". This land encompassed all of Africa as we know it today all the way to India. There is a reason the indigenous people of India not only worshiped Black gods, they were Black themselves and remain so to this day. Like most people that believe the white washed version of history you dont realize you are talking in most cases about people descended from Cush, (nubia) Canaan, Phut and Mizraim (kemet). All others are mixed breeds.

Abeed, abed are the same and literally means servant of god and where the abdul comes from. What does that have to do with the word slave coming from Slavic? You must not be very well versed on history if you didnt know euorpeans showed up with weapons and took slaves. Most Africans were forced to give up their "slaves" at gunpoint or threat of destruction. You may be able to fool someone that doesnt know any better but you better realize that there is no way you can fool me with your white fabrications and justifications.

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

 

[Vastator]

I have no doubt that much of the knowledge of the jews, christians and asian peoples was acquired, my point is it wasn't from rampaging muslim hordes. The ME doesn't exist? What a crock, it's simply a term used to describe a geographic area. Whether you like it or not is irrelevant. It arose out of the English language, so you are correct, it is a "white boy" term. Gee, it comes from an island in the north atlantic that was full of white people, you were expecting a Navajo term?

As far as your ramblings about "black gods", is there a point? People from the beginning have defined their gods as reflections of themselves, so what? It still doesn't change the fact that ancient writings described the the Egyptian people as distinctly different from Ethiopian and Nubian peoples.

White washed history is certainly an issue but not in this instance. I don't know what you're reading but the vast majority of people seem to accept that modern humans arose in Africa, although there are some who believe there may have been a parallel evolution in Asia. Again though, is there a point?

Abeed has been used a derogatory term for blacks for a very long time, it's original meaning aside. Do a little research into the tem ****** sometime, language changes.

The point with the european slave trade is that the slaves were already slaves. There is also a wealth of evidence of the europeans discussing the price they were buying those slaves for. There is also a wealth of evidence that show the africans more than willing to go out and get more slaves to supply that TRADE. As far as justifications, what a crock. I'm justifying nothing, I'm merely pointing out that all these horrors you ascribe strictly to whites are horrors practiced by virtually every group of humans that ever existed. I don't know about you but whether those taking my slavic ancestors as slaves were white, turkic or from the barbary coast is irrelevant barbarism is barbarism regardless of who's perpetrating it.

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

Your failure to mount even the most basic defense of your nonsensical positions is as clearly noted as your failure to debate... You fail. Next!?

 

[Asclepias]

The english language didnt even exist when people were building civilizations there in what the Greeks and the Africans referred to as Ethiopia. They were still living in caves and grunting to each other. its not simply a term to describe an area. Its just what I said it was. An attempt by white boys to pull the wool over peoples eyes. I expecte

I dont care what you think the vast majority of people believe. Even if that was true (which it isnt) that wouldnt make any difference. There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black.

There are lots of derogatory terms for lots of different groups. I just told you that slave came from Slavic and you came with this random abeed nonsense.

Your point is wrong. There is no proof what you say is true because whites lie all the time and have no credibility. There were many slaves that were in fact kidnapped by whites. Also slavery in other places was not the same as slavery by whites in the US. Is pure ignorance or an outright lie to attempt to portray the slavery that went on in Africa with chattel slavery of the whites were you were an object and not a human. The horrors you speak of are the ones introduced by whites. I know you would like to rationalize it but you cant. We have too much proof there was a difference. Your wildly ignorant opinion has been debunked by the pen of a person that was a slave.....


The Life of Olaudah Equiano Themes | GradeSaver

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

Your failure to mount even the most basic defense of your nonsensical positions is as clearly noted as your failure to debate... You fail. Next!?

Your opinion against experts, the Egyptians themselves and various other factors lead me to believe you really believe that BS you are trying to sell me.

 

[Vastator]

22nd

Then there's this nugget... "There are way more people on the African continent than pretty much any place on earth and they all know the Egyptians were Black."... Are you retarded? Ever heard of Asia?

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

Your failure to mount even the most basic defense of your nonsensical positions is as clearly noted as your failure to debate... You fail. Next!?

Your opinion against experts, the Egyptians themselves and various other factors lead me to believe you really believe that BS you are trying to sell me.

Hundreds of scientists, coupled with hundreds of verifiable tests; versus your meager handful of anecdotal references, and a disgraced businessman... Hmmm. Its not your fault though. Its the best you can do with the hardware you were born with. And further testament to the never ending rut subsaharan africans find themselves in, in the modern world. Id find it almost sad if i really cared. But Im a realist.

 

[Asclepias]

You must be retarded if you dont understand what "pretty much" means. By definition it leaves room for other places to have more of a population.

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

Your failure to mount even the most basic defense of your nonsensical positions is as clearly noted as your failure to debate... You fail. Next!?

Your opinion against experts, the Egyptians themselves and various other factors lead me to believe you really believe that BS you are trying to sell me.

Hundreds of scientists, coupled with hundreds of verifiable tests; versus your meager handful of anecdotal references, and a disgraced businessman... Hmmm. Its not your fault though. Its the best you can do with the hardware you were born with. And further testament to the never ending rut subsaharan africans find themselves in, in the modern world. Id find it almost sad if i really cared. But Im a realist.

When you recited that article that clearly specified a time when invaders had already over ran Egypt I figured you were an idiot. Now you have proven it. Youre actually saying that you dont believe that the ancient Egypts knew what they were and how they depicted themselves. Youre saying that the Greeks didnt know who they admitted they learned from. Youre disputing the DNA evidence that backs both parties up. You have proven your idiocy to me well enough. I gotta cut you off here. Arguing with a fool is a losing proposition.

 

[Vastator]

No that was just you realizing you have no ******* idea what youre talking about; and tried to leave yourself a backdoor.

You actually exposed the fact that you flunked reading comprehension in the 3rd grade instead.

Your failure to mount even the most basic defense of your nonsensical positions is as clearly noted as your failure to debate... You fail. Next!?

Your opinion against experts, the Egyptians themselves and various other factors lead me to believe you really believe that BS you are trying to sell me.

Hundreds of scientists, coupled with hundreds of verifiable tests; versus your meager handful of anecdotal references, and a disgraced businessman... Hmmm. Its not your fault though. Its the best you can do with the hardware you were born with. And further testament to the never ending rut subsaharan africans find themselves in, in the modern world. Id find it almost sad if i really cared. But Im a realist.

When you recited that article that clearly specified a time when invaders had already over ran Egypt I figured you were an idiot. Now you have proven it. Youre actually saying that you dont believe that the ancient Egypts knew what they were and how they depicted themselves. Youre saying that the Greeks didnt know who they admitted they learned from. Youre disputing the DNA evidence that backs both parties up. You have proven your idiocy to me well enough. I gotta cut you off here. Arguing with a fool is a losing proposition.

Invaders whose DNA was nearly the same... You didnt even read the information i gave you. The whole point of the findings illustrates that the primary stock for the Egyptians came from east of Egypt. Around the Mediterranean, and the middle east. In other words of caucasian descent, with the expected interbreeding with their slave populations.... Maybe you can find one of those uppity negroes to read it to you.