Why all the panic on the Left?

[Ame®icano]

It was a ceremonial gig. He didn't actually do any work.

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

 

[Faun]

It was a ceremonial gig. He didn't actually do any work.

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Jesus ****. When are you assfucks going to quit lying about this?

The answer is: never

 

[Nostra]

It was a ceremonial gig. He didn't actually do any work.

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

 

[Faun]

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

 

[Faun]

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

Burisma is not run by the president of Ukraine.

 

[RealDave]

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

How do we know Jr is not on Putin's payroll like his Dad?

 

[Ame®icano]

It was a ceremonial gig. He didn't actually do any work.

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

Of course it's not. Burisma or any other company can hire and pay whoever they want.

But when company does it for a politician in exchange for political favors, it is a crime.

Hunter took the position in 2014. What did Burisma get?

Burisma got end of investigation. Guy who own Burisma, Zlochevsky fled the country, and it's completely coincidental that he got cleared from wrongdoing, and his bank accounts in UK unfrozen when Biden demanded that Shokin gets fired. It's also coincidence that court annulled the ruling and reopened investigation after leaked recording of Zlochevsky and then president Poroshenko.

 

[rightwinger]

This is the reason for this bullshit impeachment charade:

Trump in a landslide? This historically accurate model predicts exactly that

The Dems really have no more moves left, they're going to get slaughtered in 2020, and we might not even have a fully functioning Democratic Party after Nov. 2020. Leftie news organizations like CNN, WAPO, NYTimes, MSNBC etc. will make their hack propagandists posing as journalists walk the plank as well.

It is a very good model that takes into account multiple economic variables in determining probability of re-election

Most presidents would easily win.....but we are talking about Trump

A President facing impeachment. A President a large percentage of Americans strongly dislike. A president who is not trusted

I am looking forward to 2020

Yes, it's the same Trump that beat 17 candidates, brought down the Clinton, Bush, and Obama dynasties, as well as a deep state criminal conspiracy by the CIA and FBI. That same Trump is predicted to win in a landslide.

Good luck with that

Trump is under an impeachment inquiry. No one has ever been re-elected while under impeachment
He is not trusted by 60 percent of the population

 

[Ame®icano]

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

 

[Faun]

So? That's not a crime.

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

Of course it's not. Burisma or any other company can hire and pay whoever they want.

But when company does it for a politician in exchange for political favors, it is a crime.

Hunter took the position in 2014. What did Burisma get?

Burisma got end of investigation. Guy who own Burisma, Zlochevsky fled the country, and it's completely coincidental that he got cleared from wrongdoing, and his bank accounts in UK unfrozen when Biden demanded that Shokin gets fired. It's also coincidence that court annulled the ruling and reopened investigation after leaked recording of Zlochevsky and then president Poroshenko.

"and his bank accounts in UK unfrozen when Biden demanded that Shokin gets fired."

You obviously don't know what the **** you're talking about.

Biden threatened to hold up the funds in March 2016.

Great Britain unfroze Zlochevsky's assets in early 2015, around the time when Shokin was named Ukraine's Prosecutor General.

Trump called this ex-Ukrainian prosecutor ‘very good.’ But he resigned in disgrace.

In 2014, authorities in Britain froze $23 million linked to Zlochevsky as part of a case against him for alleged money laundering. Shokin’s predecessor, Vitaly Yarema, failed to provide documents requested by British officials, and the money was released in the beginning of 2015.​

So Biden threatening to hold up those funds had nothing whatsoever to do with GB releasing Zlochevsky's assets, as you falsely asserted.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Uhm they are trying to impeach the president during an election year.

So? According to the right, who said a president's term is only 3 years, not 4 when they told Obama he would not get to appoint a Supreme Court replacement during his last year in office; it doesn't matter if it's an election year, Trump is close to finishing his 3 year term.

You scared shitless, must eliminate political foe, so We the people dont get to vote.

Who said you couldn't vote? Trump just can't name any more SC justices during the last year of his term, just like Obama couldn't.

McConnell has already said he would ram that through immediately. There's nothing the Democrats can do to stop it.

That's true. Just like there will be nothing Republicans can do next time we have a Democrat president with a Democrat Congress and they decide to add seats to the U.S. Supreme Court to add more Librrals.

Indeed. A numbers game. Right now Trump has the advantage.

 

[Nostra]

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

Burisma is not run by the president of Ukraine.

Dodge noted.

 

[Faun]

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

 

[Nostra]

Of course not. Dimwinger corruptions is not a crime.

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

How do we know Jr is not on Putin's payroll like his Dad?

I would ask you to provide your evidence Trump is on Putin's payroll, but we all know you are a lying sack with no proof whatsoever.

 

[Faun]

Paying someone a salary because their father is VP is not a crime.

So you would be good with Putin paying Don Jr. a billion dollars because Daddy is President?

It wasn't the president of Ukraine paying Hunter Biden; it was a private company.

Ok, one of the companies Putin runs.

Now what?

Burisma is not run by the president of Ukraine.

Dodge noted.

LOLOL

Aww, poor baby is crying because his analogy failed him.

 

[Ame®icano]

A VP threatening to blackmail Ukraine by withholding a billion in military aid should they not fire a prosecutor investigating a corrupt company his son was getting bribes to the tune of 50,000 a month is certainly a crime.

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

 

[Faun]

Stop lying. His son's company was not under investigation when Biden threatened to hold up the money.

WSJ News Exclusive | Trump Repeatedly Pressed Ukraine President to Investigate Biden’s Son

Mr. Giuliani has suggested Mr. Biden’s motivation was to protect his son, a lawyer who has been involved in several investment and consulting firms, although Mr. Shokin had already completed his investigation of Burisma Group before he left office.​

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

 

[Ame®icano]

So when Shokin said that he was fired because of investigation, he was lying?

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

 

[Faun]

Of course he was. Every news article, left, center & right, that reported on this has reported there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds. Every Ukrainian except for Shokin who spoke about this said there was no active investigation into Burisma or Hunter Biden when Biden threatened to hold up the funds.

The only one to say the investigation was open was Shokin. And he only said that on September 4th of this year. And he has an axe to grind against Joe Biden who got him fired.

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

So what you're saying, Shokin said it because he held a grudge for Biden having him fired.

According to the tape where Biden bragging about firing of Shokin, the one holding a grudge is Biden himself.

Biden got Shokin fired. Here we are, 3½ years later, and the only one saying Shokin was actively investigating Burisma is Shokin. And he only started saying that 2 months ago after talking with Rudy Giuliani, who was trying to help Shokin gain admittance to the U.S.

You keep saying that investigation ended before Shokin got fired. The only proof on that is WSJ article with intent to accuse Trump of wrongdoing.

Why no mention of Shokin's deposition?

On several occasions President Poroshenko asked me to have a look at the case against Burisma and consider the possibility of winding down the investigative actions in respect of this company but I refused to close this investigation.

If he was holding a grudge, he could have complain about it long ago. So why he acted now?
According to his deposition, he did it to clear his name. Read paragraph 9, where he realized the actual reason for him being dismissed.

Again, not a single news article from 2015 through now corroborates his recent claim of investigating Burisma.

The affidavit also reads, "facts mentioned at this statement have not been verified by the notary."

And it appears he didn't sign that affidavit ...

So why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Right...

Original statement is given in Russian. This is the translation.

Notary's job is not to verify facts in the statement, but to be impartial witness in giving of the statement.

That doesn't answer the question...

Why on Earth should anyone ignore every news article on the subject, and ignore every historical recollection on the subject; only to believe the one person who was fired because of Biden, who didn't sign his sworn statement which wasn't verified, and was working directly with Trump's personal attorney to gain entrance into the U.S..?

Why on Earth would anyone believe a current-day Democrat, or anyone connected with them?