Why a consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies

[Midnight FM]

It's pretty simple. Babies cost money. There is no requirement for anyone to have a baby other than functioning sex organs. And many taxpayer-funded systems serve to support babies whose parents aren't able to provide for them.

Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is or isn't killing a baby. A consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies, as this would:

1. Eliminate the need for taxpayer-funded services which support babies and pregnant women. It can simply be legal for them to kill the baby, and the taxpayers could keep more of their money.

2. Allow people more opportunity to spend their money on consumer products, rather than having to waste it on children, which would be of economic benefit to many companies and corporations.

So get over your moral qualms, and just make it legal to kill babies, if consumer culture is what you want to support. If you have moral qualms about the welfare of babies, then this has to extend to moral qualms about their welfare after they are born as well.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That is no justification to allow killing babies. There are lines you shouldn't cross, and this is one.

 

[OKTexas]

It's pretty simple. Babies cost money. There is no requirement for anyone to have a baby other than functioning sex organs. And many taxpayer-funded systems serve to support babies whose parents aren't able to provide for them.

Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is or isn't killing a baby. A consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies, as this would:

1. Eliminate the need for taxpayer-funded services which support babies and pregnant women. It can simply be legal for them to kill the baby, and the taxpayers could keep more of their money.

2. Allow people more opportunity to spend their money on consumer products, rather than having to waste it on children, which would be of economic benefit to many companies and corporations.

So get over your moral qualms, and just make it legal to kill babies, if consumer culture is what you want to support. If you have moral qualms about the welfare of babies, then this has to extend to moral qualms about their welfare after they are born as well.

The fallacy in your hypothesis is babies are big time consumers and support the consumer economy more than many adults.

.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The fallacy in your hypothesis is babies are big time consumers and support the consumer economy more than many adults.

.

A better argument might be... we only have finite land, finite resources and as we get more and more people, we create more and more problems. Problems with water, with enough room to grow crops etc etc.

We don't need this many people on this planet. We don't need to increase the size of the world's population. We'd be better off with LESS people.

 

[OKTexas]

A better argument might be... we only have finite land, finite resources and as we get more and more people, we create more and more problems. Problems with water, with enough room to grow crops etc etc.

We don't need this many people on this planet. We don't need to increase the size of the world's population. We'd be better off with LESS people.

Exactly how does fewer people square with the OP saying we need consumers to benefit many companies? He obviously wants more demand not less.

.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Exactly how does fewer people square with the OP saying we need consumers to benefit many companies? He obviously wants more demand not less.

.

I didn't say it did. I was pointing to what I see as the real reason why we should have abortion.

 

[luiza]

A better argument might be... we only have finite land, finite resources and as we get more and more people, we create more and more problems. Problems with water, with enough room to grow crops etc etc.

We don't need this many people on this planet. We don't need to increase the size of the world's population. We'd be better off with LESS people.

Except 60% of planet land mass has never had anybody set foot on it .
So I understand .

 

[Midnight FM]

That is no justification to allow killing babies. There are lines you shouldn't cross, and this is one.

Well, I wouldn't, but if someone isn't concerned about the welfare of children after they're born, they should support killing babies.

 

[cnm]

Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is or isn't killing a baby. A consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies, as this would:

1. Eliminate the need for taxpayer-funded services which support babies and pregnant women. It can simply be legal for them to kill the baby, and the taxpayers could keep more of their money.

How does a consumer driven society have taxpayer funded services?

 

[Chuz Life]

I want everyone to know. This is not a sock. (Not mine anyway) He does make proaborts look bad though. So, I wish I thought of it.

 

[Correll]

A better argument might be... we only have finite land, finite resources and as we get more and more people, we create more and more problems. Problems with water, with enough room to grow crops etc etc.

We don't need this many people on this planet. We don't need to increase the size of the world's population. We'd be better off with LESS people.

Sounds like a good argument against immigration, legal or not.

 

[luiza]

Why a consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies​

Presumably because it already enjoys the sport

36? Killer Jabs called vaccines in first few months
Contaminated Air
Contaminated Water
Contaminated Food
Contaminated Parents .
Free holidays to Gaza .

What a wonderful world

 

[Darkwind]

It's pretty simple. Babies cost money. There is no requirement for anyone to have a baby other than functioning sex organs. And many taxpayer-funded systems serve to support babies whose parents aren't able to provide for them.

Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is or isn't killing a baby. A consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies, as this would:

1. Eliminate the need for taxpayer-funded services which support babies and pregnant women. It can simply be legal for them to kill the baby, and the taxpayers could keep more of their money.

2. Allow people more opportunity to spend their money on consumer products, rather than having to waste it on children, which would be of economic benefit to many companies and corporations.

So get over your moral qualms, and just make it legal to kill babies, if consumer culture is what you want to support. If you have moral qualms about the welfare of babies, then this has to extend to moral qualms about their welfare after they are born as well.

It used to be that we could spot those with a bad brain lobe by the fact that they would be kneeling down and slowly pulling the wings off of butterflies.

Now we just come to this forum and read posts like this.

 

[Midnight FM]

I want everyone to know. This is not a sock. (Not mine anyway) He does make proaborts look bad though. So, I wish I thought of it.

You missed the point. This is a criticism of those who are against abortion, but unconcerned with the welfare of children after they're born.

 

[Correll]

You missed the point. This is a criticism of those who are against abortion, but unconcerned with the welfare of children after they're born.

It's a insanely dumb criticism.

 

[Independent thinker]

It's pretty simple. Babies cost money. There is no requirement for anyone to have a baby other than functioning sex organs. And many taxpayer-funded systems serve to support babies whose parents aren't able to provide for them.

Therefore, it doesn't matter whether or not abortion is or isn't killing a baby. A consumer-driven culture should allow the killing of babies, as this would:

1. Eliminate the need for taxpayer-funded services which support babies and pregnant women. It can simply be legal for them to kill the baby, and the taxpayers could keep more of their money.

2. Allow people more opportunity to spend their money on consumer products, rather than having to waste it on children, which would be of economic benefit to many companies and corporations.

So get over your moral qualms, and just make it legal to kill babies, if consumer culture is what you want to support. If you have moral qualms about the welfare of babies, then this has to extend to moral qualms about their welfare after they are born as well.

On a similar note, leftists say that humans are responsible for global warming. Not only do we manufacture shit which pollutes the environment, but we need shelter, food, clothing, etc. Hell, just humans breathing produces green house gases. So, as long as people are muliplying at exponential rates, there is literally no way to stop human caused climate change no matter what we do, as long as the world's population continues to grow. This brings me to your point. The only real way to stop global warming is to cull massive numbers of people because as long as people are here with an ever growing population, culling is our only solution to actually solve the global warming problem.

 

[Correll]

On a similar note, leftists say that humans are responsible for global warming. Not only do we manufacture shit which pollutes the environment, but we need shelter, food, clothing, etc. Hell, just humans breathing produces green house gases. So, as long as people are muliplying at exponential rates, there is literally no way to stop human caused climate change no matter what we do, as long as the world's population continues to grow. This brings me to your point. The only real way to stop global warming is to cull massive numbers of people because as long as people are here with an ever growing population, culling is our only solution to actually solve the global warming problem.

Except population is crashing. So, your point is false.

 

[Independent thinker]

Except population is crashing. So, your point is false.

Ah, so you're saying that humans don't cause global warming. Look, back in the caveman days there probably weren't even one million people on the planet. Now there are around 8 billion and they all contribute to global warming, every single one of them. The only solution is to cull at least 7 billion people, if not more. That will fix the problem. I propose we start with leftists.

 

[Midnight FM]

The reality is that babies, especially those born to poor mothers who receive welfare cost taxpayer money.

If you favor lower taxes, you should support making it legal to kill babies, since killing them would reduce the burden they have on the taxpayer.

If you don't support killing babies, then you're secretly a socialist, since you favor perpetuating the system of taxpayer dollars being used to care for children born to low-income mothers.

 

[BackAgain]

The reality is that babies, especially those born to poor mothers who receive welfare cost taxpayer money.

If you favor lower taxes, you should support making it legal to kill babies, since killing them would reduce the burden they have on the taxpayer.

When did they first notice that you are retarded?