Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?

[Wehrwolfen]

Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?



by Roger L Simon
November 16, 2012


Apparently, David Petraeus doesn’t just lie about his private life. He also at least airbrushes the truth when it comes to national security, telling the House Intelligence Committee that he always said Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

Rep. Peter King – who attended both Petraeus’ testimony Friday and the former DCIA’s briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14 — has a more jaundiced view:

Petraeus’ testimony both challenges the Obama administration’s repeated claims that the attack was a “spontaneous” protest over an anti-Islam video, and according to King conflicts with his own briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14. Sources have said Petraeus, in that briefing, also described the attack as a protest that spun out of control.

“His testimony today was that from the start, he had told us that this was a terrorist attack,” King said, adding that he told Petraeus he had a “different recollection.”

But never mind the self-serving shifting sands of the increasingly slimy general. The lede from the same Fox story is the important news:

Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al-Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.

There’s your smoking gun, as the saying goes. Someone, or ones, somewhere redacted that crucial line.

Who?


[excerpt]

Read more:
Roger L. Simon » Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?

 

[konradv]

Couldn't it be both, a spontaneous riot used as cover by terrorist plotters waiting to take advantage of chaos?

 

[tyroneweaver]

this administration is getting more brazen every day with their lying. They know that in reality nobody is going to do anything about it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Bush, for propping up Khadaffi.

 

[Dot Com]

Republicans for cutting funding.

 

[bucs90]

CRAZY ASS MUSLIMS.

Thats who is responsible.

 

[AmyNation]

Terrorists.

 

[AmyNation]

Couldn't it be both, a spontaneous riot used as cover by terrorist plotters waiting to take advantage of chaos?

Not likely, too correndated.

 

[BreezeWood]

the CIA was responsible for security inside of Libya.

 

[konradv]

this administration is getting more brazen every day with their lying. They know that in reality nobody is going to do anything about it.

Do anything about what? It's not like you can point to a crime, like when Reagan sold arms to Iran and gave the money to the terrorist contras.

 

[konradv]

Couldn't it be both, a spontaneous riot used as cover by terrorist plotters waiting to take advantage of chaos?

Not likely, too correndated.

The attack may have been coordinated, but that doesn't mean the riot was.

 

[Sallow]

the CIA was responsible for security inside of Libya.

No they are not.

They are not even suppose to be in the country.

CIA can be shot, legally, on sight.

 

[Lumpy 1]

4 Americans died, their families are broken hearted and Democrats could care less..

 

[Sallow]

4 Americans died, their families are broken hearted and Democrats could care less..

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-CAcdta_8I]Falwell and Robertson on The 700 Club after 9/11 - YouTube[/ame]

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,




"Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?"





1. *Where The Buck Stops* = Obama


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[konradv]

4 Americans died, their families are broken hearted and Democrats could care less..

Republicans only seem to care so far as they can lay blame on Obama. So there.

 

[emptystep]

Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?



by Roger L Simon
November 16, 2012


Apparently, David Petraeus doesn’t just lie about his private life. He also at least airbrushes the truth when it comes to national security, telling the House Intelligence Committee that he always said Benghazi was a terrorist attack.

Rep. Peter King – who attended both Petraeus’ testimony Friday and the former DCIA’s briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14 — has a more jaundiced view:

Petraeus’ testimony both challenges the Obama administration’s repeated claims that the attack was a “spontaneous” protest over an anti-Islam video, and according to King conflicts with his own briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14. Sources have said Petraeus, in that briefing, also described the attack as a protest that spun out of control.

“His testimony today was that from the start, he had told us that this was a terrorist attack,” King said, adding that he told Petraeus he had a “different recollection.”

But never mind the self-serving shifting sands of the increasingly slimy general. The lede from the same Fox story is the important news:

Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al-Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.

There’s your smoking gun, as the saying goes. Someone, or ones, somewhere redacted that crucial line.

Who?


[excerpt]

Read more:
Roger L. Simon » Who Is Responsible for Benghazi?

Senator Feinstein stated that from what she knew the talking points that came out of the intelligence community were the same as the ones the White House, and Rice, used.

p.s. Roger L. Simon appears to be a loon.