To BULLDOG: Both of your links are masterpieces of misdirection.
We are keeping track. Below is a list of every false claim Trump has made since his inauguration on Jan. 20, 2017.
Donald Trump has now said more than 300 false things as president | Toronto Star
Bottom line: Trump’s CLAIMS are open to interpretation. Hillary’s lies are undeniable lies with no other interpretation possible.
p.s. Compare President Trump acting as commander in chief to Hillary’s taste for killing:
Hillary Clinton offers so many scandals to choose from her guilt for the Waco Massacre was totally ignored by the media —— and Donald Trump —— in her presidential campaign, and with good reason. Waco produced dead bodies, while finding the bodies in the e-mail server and the Clinton Foundation scandals are out of sight.
Covering up for then-First Lady Hillary Clinton’s bloodbath remains one of the cruelest scandals because the murders were premeditated:
"Give me a reason not to do this," Janet Reno is said to have begged aides shortly before orders were issued in the final assault. After the complete disaster of the final assault on the Branch Davidians, Bill Clinton was refusing to face the media, and Janet Reno stepped out to take full responsibility in front of the cameras. But the real "Woman in Charge" responsible for the deaths of 76 Branch Davidians, including 21 children and two pregnant women was was Hillary, not Janet Reno.
XXXXX
Mrs Clinton grew more and more impatient as the Waco stand-off came to dominate the headlines [Hillary wanted to get so-called "heath care reform" done, and Waco was taking all the headlines in spring, 1993, so Hillary forced the Waco resolution with disastrous results and a lot of death - Robert Morrow ] during the early months of the Clinton administration, said Bell. It was she, according to Bell's sources, who pressured a reluctant Janet Reno to act.
A Long Chain Of Scandals
Incidentally, aside from Waco, and Hillary’s Arab Spring, let me remind you of suicide —— murder to everyone except Inspector Clouseau:
If the Clintons had no part in Foster’s death they should have wanted to get at the truth. They did not. If they took part in Foster’s murder, or the coverup, they made a big mistake that is coming back to haunt them:
XXXXX
Hillary might have gotten away with her involvement just as she got away with Benghazi. Now the “suicide coverup” is back in the news as though it happened yesterday. Credit goes to Donald Trump playing by rules the Clintons wrote:
The Clintons should have accepted the gift offered by skeptics and ordered the police to call it murder instead of suicide. There was no way they would ever be charged with ordering Foster’s murder, and they would have looked like they wanted the truth to come out.
Behind the scenes the police could have found a patsy to take the fall. Hell, the “suspect” could have been gunned down while resisting arrest; thereby, ending the investigation. If a made-to-order patsy wasn’t available the police could have continued looking for the murderer with the same vim and vigor O. J. devoted to looking for his wife’s killer. The investigation would have dragged on in the media for a few years until it faded into an unsolved crime.
Every cover-up carries the same pitfalls. So all things considered the Clintons would have been better off calling it murder. Murder demands proof while calling it suicide to hide murder always ends up in the realms of speculation, interpretation, and eternal life. Case in point: Foster’s “suicide” is alive and well in Benghazi:
The Fix is in: Hillary’s Benghazi cover-up—like Vince Foster death investigation
XXXXX
They Were Not That Great The First Time