Now that everyone knows the corrupt top candidates for president, who do we vote for. Not only that, can we find a candidate who the majority of people will vote for. We have no time. If majority of voters don't vote for the same person, we may be throwing away our vote. I just can not vote for Trump or Hillary. Hopefully we can find a common ground and vote for some one person.
You vote for the party that you would be willing to accept legal financial and social responsibility for the laws and agenda they pass and promote.
Like picking a religious affiliation, where leaders and members of each group are held legally and fiscally responsible for the costs and actions of that group.
So pick whichever group you feel has the best ability to enforce sound and sustainable policies instead of incurring costs and waste, damages and abuses to the public.
Which group would better check and correct or prevent liabilities. And given that the candidates are flawed, which would be easier to hold in check and incur the least damage.
If they are going to cause liabilities, either way, which is easier to cap with damage controls and cut the losses.
Which one would you rather have to deal with or pay for -- the one who talks transparently in public, even making threats to do things that can't be done because it isn't logistically or Constitutionally possible; or the one who takes the Fifth Amendment in public in order to play and stay safe, then pulls political strings behind the scenes without any accountability. Which one is easier to predict, deal with and manage; and which one is more dangerous and unstoppable.
I think it is very clear which candidate is more independent, and thus easier to keep in check, and would shift responsibility to the people to tell govt what to do and what not to do, and not be able to do otherwise. And which would continue using govt as a collective power base to push individual and political agenda without considering the consent and representation of others.
If you believe in using political parties and corporate interests/media that way,
all I ask is that people who vote and support that accept financial, legal and social
responsibility for the costs and consequences of letting that trend continue.
