Who Are The Palestinians?

[LOki]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

 

[montelatici]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

 

[LOki]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

Really? So, the British never abandoned administration of Palestine then, eh?

Israeli sovereignty was never established in 1948?

No Arab nations invaded Israel?

That's an example of your "adult" discussion?

That kind of denial of reality is for retards. You can have it.

 

[Phoenall]

No, in 627 AD, the 'Arab Muslims" (who were mostly former Christian converts to Islam) as you call massacred the Christians (there were no Jews in Jerusalem at the time as they were not allowed in by the Christian Byzantines) and they permitted Jews, previously excluded by the Christian Byzantines back into Jerusalem.

Jews, from then, lived with the Muslims as a minority in Jerusalem until the First Crusade when Christian knights from Europe capture Jerusalem after seven weeks of siege and massacred the city's Muslim and Jewish population on July 14, 1099.

As to your other nonsensical point the website makes it clear in the text who the aggressor was. I don't think Arabs were attacking Arab villages.


"By the end of 1947........Jews were pursuing their 'facts on the ground' policy by attacking and destroying Arab villages and ejecting the inhabitants."

"The British are criticized for not actively defending the Arab villages but there were insufficient troops and the US had refused assistance in the form of troops or other support (many US and other factions, including British, were actively supporting the Zionist takeover and had powerful backing). General Stockwell had specific orders that troops should only be used for defence. He was in liaison with both Arabs and Zionists and knew how strong the Haganah were (contrary to myth) and that the Palestinian Arabs, though they had plenty of courage, were badly organized, equipped and trained so stood no chance against the Zionists. Consequently, the Haganah was quickly able to occupy territory way beyond that designated by the UN."

Who was there - British Forces in Palestine

So you are now saying that Mohamed and his followers were all converts from Christianity and took over all of Saudi Arabia starting with Medina and Mecca. You do realise that the Jews were not in Palestine don't you, and were in Arabia when Mohamed and his 5,000 strong horde of arab muslim psychopaths wiped them out.

Get it right Abdul the site only deals with a small period of time, which happens to coincide with civil unrest in Palestine brought about by arab nationalism. The leaders of the surrounding lands whipped up trouble and set the ball rolling, as your other link stated the British faced aggression from the arab muslims in Palestine. Cant have been the Jews as there were none there according to you.

 

[Phoenall]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Nope as the arab muslims were enemies of Israel and so had no place there. Just as the Italians and Germans had no place in the UK or US during WW2, so they were evicted or incarcerated as enemies.

 

[Phoenall]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

 

[LOki]

You are quite wrong.

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

The Israelis had started ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims in 1947 well before the departure of the British.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.

The Arab troops that intervened in 1948 were attempting to prevent the Jews from continuing and finalizing the ethnic cleansing/genocide of the Christians and Muslims.

The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

 

[montelatici]

Oh? Then demonstrate, because what you've offered fails to address my point.

I won't dispute this. Not because I agree with you, but rather, it's entirely beside the point.


The only relevant point you've made here is that the Arab troops invaded Israel...their rational for doing so is inconsequential to the point--making the rest of your post irrelevant.

I'm not a social justice warrior, and I'm not making a social justice point. I find the reaching back into antiquity for the first cause rationalizations that validate the brutality those rock-chucking retards inflict upon each other (and all of us too) to be tedious and unproductive. Mostly because it's all full if lies. Hence, that narrative is not something I'm going to give weight to.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

 

[LOki]

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

 

[Hossfly]

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I see Tinmore thanked your post. Because you and Tinny and a gaggle of other losers keep repeating the same Palestinian talking points over and over and over and over...........................

 

[montelatici]

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

 

[LOki]

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

Little Pumpkin, there's just no reason for me to answer to your fact regarding European colonization... your "fact" is simply not relevant to the point I made.

It is literally irrelevant to the situation. Israel was a recognized nation, it was invaded, certain Israelis sided with the invaders, and the invaders lost. Those are facts not in dispute.

I refuse to be drawn into your retarded rationalizations regarding who chucked the first rock at whom so many generations in the past. Such stories from both sides are full of lies, and the lies weigh equally against each other. Peddle your dopey crusade to someone who will share in your mawkish outrage--I'm not a buyer.

But if you want to dispute the conclusions drawn from the indisputable facts presented, I'm an eager audience. But if you're just going to catalog all the crimes you perceive that were committed against your preferred people, then I'm telling you now I will not be persuaded by such bullshit emotional manipulations.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I see Tinmore thanked your post. Because you and Tinny and a gaggle of other losers keep repeating the same Palestinian talking points over and over and over and over...........................

That is because "patently verifiable fact" is historically correct.

 

[toastman]

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

Here's what really happened. After Israel legally declared independence , 5 Arab nations tried to destroy the new country and expel the Jewish residents. Problem is, the Jews were stronger than the Arabs thought, and they ended up expelling those who tried to expel them. You reap what you sow.

 

[montelatici]

No, Arab nations attempted to stop the ethnic cleansing of Christians and Muslims. And, the invading Europeans had more military might and were successful in ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims.

 

[montelatici]

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

Little Pumpkin, there's just no reason for me to answer to your fact regarding European colonization... your "fact" is simply not relevant to the point I made.

It is literally irrelevant to the situation. Israel was a recognized nation, it was invaded, certain Israelis sided with the invaders, and the invaders lost. Those are facts not in dispute.

I refuse to be drawn into your retarded rationalizations regarding who chucked the first rock at whom so many generations in the past. Such stories from both sides are full of lies, and the lies weigh equally against each other. Peddle your dopey crusade to someone who will share in your mawkish outrage--I'm not a buyer.

But if you want to dispute the conclusions drawn from the indisputable facts presented, I'm an eager audience. But if you're just going to catalog all the crimes you perceive that were committed against your preferred people, then I'm telling you now I will not be persuaded by such bullshit emotional manipulations.

The indisputable fact is that Europeans went to another continent, expelled the people living there and created a nation.

 

[LOki]

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

Little Pumpkin, there's just no reason for me to answer to your fact regarding European colonization... your "fact" is simply not relevant to the point I made.

It is literally irrelevant to the situation. Israel was a recognized nation, it was invaded, certain Israelis sided with the invaders, and the invaders lost. Those are facts not in dispute.

I refuse to be drawn into your retarded rationalizations regarding who chucked the first rock at whom so many generations in the past. Such stories from both sides are full of lies, and the lies weigh equally against each other. Peddle your dopey crusade to someone who will share in your mawkish outrage--I'm not a buyer.

But if you want to dispute the conclusions drawn from the indisputable facts presented, I'm an eager audience. But if you're just going to catalog all the crimes you perceive that were committed against your preferred people, then I'm telling you now I will not be persuaded by such bullshit emotional manipulations.

The indisputable fact is that Europeans went to another continent, expelled the people living there and created a nation.

and....

 

[Phoenall]

No, the only relevant point is that the Europeans began ethnically cleansing the Christians and Muslims from their homes well before the British left or the creation of Israel, making the creation of an Arab state within the borders set forth by the partition plan impossible.

Like I said, this line of rationalization is tedious and unproductive. It carries no weight and is irrelevant to the point I presented.

What carries no weight is the line you presented, because it has no basis in fact. Run along and leave this to the adults.

When one on your side turns up will you let the board know ?

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

Then how come they are still there, unlike the Jews and Christians who were truly ethnically cleansed from all arab lands. The facts show that you are just a LIAR as the Palestinians are multiplying faster than fleas on a rat. It is the Christians that are showing the signs of being ethnically cleansed as their numbers have dropped by 90% and all the indications are that the Palestinians are the ones doing the cleansing. It is the same lament from the arab muslims to cover up their excessive behaviour and atrocities, so they lie and twist the truth to meet their POV

 

[Phoenall]

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

Little Pumpkin, there's just no reason for me to answer to your fact regarding European colonization... your "fact" is simply not relevant to the point I made.

It is literally irrelevant to the situation. Israel was a recognized nation, it was invaded, certain Israelis sided with the invaders, and the invaders lost. Those are facts not in dispute.

I refuse to be drawn into your retarded rationalizations regarding who chucked the first rock at whom so many generations in the past. Such stories from both sides are full of lies, and the lies weigh equally against each other. Peddle your dopey crusade to someone who will share in your mawkish outrage--I'm not a buyer.

But if you want to dispute the conclusions drawn from the indisputable facts presented, I'm an eager audience. But if you're just going to catalog all the crimes you perceive that were committed against your preferred people, then I'm telling you now I will not be persuaded by such bullshit emotional manipulations.

The indisputable fact is that Europeans went to another continent, expelled the people living there and created a nation.

and....

No and it is just another Islamic blood libel and lie

 

[MJB12741]

Seriously.

When faced with conclusions drawn from patently verifiable facts of reality, montelatici petulantly stamps her little pink bootie into the 6,000 year old dust of her flat earth, and angrily shakes her chubby little fist at her geocentric cosmology, and sanctimoniously declares in her squishy voice that those facts are not real.

All that retard wants to engage in is a rock chucking conflict over who chucked the first rock in the retarded rock chucking conflict in the middle east.

We all know how "adult" and productive that behavior has proven to be.

The only patently verifiable fact, that is not subject to any interpretation, is that Europeans went to another continent colonized an area and ethnically cleansed most of the indigenous people living in that area.

I have no interest in your dopey crusade little SJW. Take your mawkish outrage at another entirely unrelated subject to your homeopathic, pony-kin, drum circle where it can get traction with other bong-smoke militants.

I see you have no answer to the basic fact, which is, if Europeans had not facilitated the colonization of another continent by Europeans of a particular religion, the current problem between colonizer and colonized in Palestine would not exist.

As far as your characterization of me. leave it at home. You couldn't be more deluded.

Little Pumpkin, there's just no reason for me to answer to your fact regarding European colonization... your "fact" is simply not relevant to the point I made.

It is literally irrelevant to the situation. Israel was a recognized nation, it was invaded, certain Israelis sided with the invaders, and the invaders lost. Those are facts not in dispute.

I refuse to be drawn into your retarded rationalizations regarding who chucked the first rock at whom so many generations in the past. Such stories from both sides are full of lies, and the lies weigh equally against each other. Peddle your dopey crusade to someone who will share in your mawkish outrage--I'm not a buyer.

But if you want to dispute the conclusions drawn from the indisputable facts presented, I'm an eager audience. But if you're just going to catalog all the crimes you perceive that were committed against your preferred people, then I'm telling you now I will not be persuaded by such bullshit emotional manipulations.

The indisputable fact is that Europeans went to another continent, expelled the people living there and created a nation.

LMAO. Right on Monti. You have a very fine brain. You see, it's a clear case of ethnic cleansing. In 1948 there were approximately 1.2 million Palestinisn living in Israel. And now there are only around 6 million of them left.

Population Statistics - Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - ProCon.org