Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

Thay are still in the invasion phase.

Sounds awful!!!

Which country did they invade?
Which one are they still invading?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Palestine's Right to Defend Itself

Ibrahim Sharqieh argues that Israel's self defense card has run out, and that Palestine too has the right to defend itself from the brutality and violence of Israeli forces, which have led to a death toll of almost 100 people in the past few days alone. He then asserts that the U.S. needs to...

www.brookings.edu

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Nice duck. Was it "terrorism" for the US to attack Britain in 1812?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Palestine's Right to Defend Itself

Ibrahim Sharqieh argues that Israel's self defense card has run out, and that Palestine too has the right to defend itself from the brutality and violence of Israeli forces, which have led to a death toll of almost 100 people in the past few days alone. He then asserts that the U.S. needs to...

www.brookings.edu

Israel has long used illegal tactics of collective punishment in Gaza, effectively laying siege to an area home to 1.7 million people while periodically shelling homes and schools,

If only your terrorist buddies would stop using homes and schools to stage terror attacks.

 

[Hollie]

Nice duck. Was it "terrorism" for the US to attack Britain in 1812?

Obviously, you don’t see that as a laughable, utterly preposterous attempt at comparison.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Palestine's Right to Defend Itself

Ibrahim Sharqieh argues that Israel's self defense card has run out, and that Palestine too has the right to defend itself from the brutality and violence of Israeli forces, which have led to a death toll of almost 100 people in the past few days alone. He then asserts that the U.S. needs to...

www.brookings.edu

July 17, 2014


Jerusalem (AFP) - The UN agency for Palestinian refugees UNRWA said Thursday it was investigating after finding 20 rockets hidden in one of its vacant schools in the Gaza Strip.
It condemned the incident as a "flagrant violation" of international law and said the rockets had been removed and the "relative parties" informed.
"Yesterday, in the course of the regular inspection of its premises, UNRWA discovered approximately 20 rockets hidden in a vacant school in the Gaza Strip," the agency said in a statement.

"UNRWA strongly condemns the group or groups responsible for placing the weapons in one of its installations," it continued.


UNRWA investigates after rockets found in Gaza school (yahoo.com)

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Palestine's Right to Defend Itself

Ibrahim Sharqieh argues that Israel's self defense card has run out, and that Palestine too has the right to defend itself from the brutality and violence of Israeli forces, which have led to a death toll of almost 100 people in the past few days alone. He then asserts that the U.S. needs to...

www.brookings.edu

A television reporter from the Finnish Helsingin Sanomat confirmed Friday that Hamas has been firing rockets out of the Al-Shifa Hospital.

The reporter, who was not named in the television segment shot on-site at Gaza City’s main hospital, said a rocket was launched “right in the back the parking lot” of the hospital at 2 a.m. on Friday morning.


“Really, it happened right in the area, the sound of it was really loud,” she said, confirming longstanding Israeli claims that Hamas is committing war crimes in the Gaza Strip by shooting from civilian concentrations, medical centers and other humanitarian institutions.



Finnish TV: Rockets from Gaza hospital | The Times of Israel

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

 

[P F Tinmore]

after finding 20 rockets hidden in one of its vacant schools in the Gaza Strip.

Indeed, not in a populated area.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

after finding 20 rockets hidden in one of its vacant schools in the Gaza Strip.

Indeed, not in a populated area.

Where did it say the area was unpopulated?

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Invasion
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is merely a flight of fancy and imagination. The Israelis never invaded any sovereign territory of the Arab Palestinians; not one single square inch. In fact, I have trouble identifying "Palestine" as a "State" prior to December 2012.

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

(COMMENT)

In 1967, Israel pursued Jordanian Forces through the West Bank and Jerusalem and across the River back into Jordan. The Israeli Defense Force (IDF) occupied sovereign Jordanian territory. The IDF did NOT occupy Arab Palestinian Territory.

In August 1988, Jordan cut all ties with its territory west of the Jordan River. Absent any formed Arab Palestinian Government at the time, the territory fell into a protected status until 1993 and the Oslo Accords between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). By 1995, Areas "A" • "B" • "C" • "Gaza Strip" • "Jerusalem" were established.

There is NO definition for an entity known as a "Proper Occupying Power." However, the discussion of the status of the territory under the effective IDF control may be beyond International Law which has not kept-up with the need for these types of territorial confrontations and consequences (forming outcomes).

Also, the outcome of the 1973 Yom Kipper War (another Arab League 'v' Israel Confrontation) has not been factored into the International understanding of the political equation. These outcomes lead directly to the Oslo Accords 1993-1994; as well as the Nations Security Council Resolutions 242 and 338.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Sixties Fan]

[It is Ramadan, and Muslims are "livid" against Jews.
1700 years of "livid" reactions against the Jews, their favorite dhimhis}



Palestinians are livid that this photo exists. Imagine, a wire service photographer - a Palestinian, no less - who chooses to show something that doesn't portray every Israeli as a monster!


(full article online)

Palestinians upset at AFP photo showing IDF soldier protecting an Arab woman

Blogging about Israel and the Arab world since, oh, forever.

elderofziyon.blogspot.com

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Self-Defense
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: There is no such thing as a Sovereign State like Israel not having the Right to Self-Defense as an attack by quasi-Government sponsored non-state actors like the Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.

(COMMENT)

Periodically, this bogus argument (Israel has no Right to Self-Defense) is raised from time-to-time. This is Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) subterfuge.

It is well established that the Palestinian Authority (President Mahmoud Abbas) was opposed to the furtherance of Israel forging peaceful arrangements independent of the Israeli-Palestinian Confrontation, in the interest of economic objectives, political normalization, and the maintenance of international peace and security.

The HoAP address almost every endeavor towards international peace and security with opposition. Their policy is Armed Struggle and Jihad are the only way to achieve their national interests.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

RE: Who Are The Palestinians? Part 2
SUBTOPIC: Reward to a Terrorist Supporting Government
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: I would be very careful who YOU direct profanity at on this matter.

IF the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) commits an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (ie the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) →
THEN the HoAP is subject to prosecution under International Humanitarian Law (IHL) in accordance with penal provisions promulgated by the Occupying Power.

...One of the PA’s celebrity gee-had killers was released from prison and Death Cult TV was falling over themselves to attach the “model of sacrifice” label...

What dumbfuck wrote this? Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism.
Look it up.

(COMMENT)

YOU might want to look-up the Customary and IHL (Article 68 of the GCIV). Yes, simple fact checking shows that YOU are 100% WRONG.

Furthermore, advocating (as YOU do) that attacks upon the Occupying Power (the IDF) are a legal undertaking is a violation of International Human Rights Law (HRL). YOU know this because it has been explained to you many times.

Article 20 - International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR)​

1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.​

​

2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.​

​

YOU are (in my opinion) violating HRL just by using this forum to spread this false and inaccurate information, which is deliberately intended to deceive the reader and encourage further violence by susceptible readers.

S/RES/1624 (2005) • Reaffirming also the imperative to combat terrorism in all its forms and manifestations by all means to comply with all their obligations under international law:​

​

1. Calls upon all States to adopt such measures as may be necessary and appropriate and in accordance with their obligations under international law to:​

​

(a) Prohibit by law incitement to commit a terrorist act or acts;​

(YOU: "Attacking foreign invading forces is not terrorism. Look it up.")​

​

(b) Prevent such conduct;​

[By using your authoritative voice, you are essentially advocating that it is OK to commit such action as:​

Criminal Acts directed against the Occupying Power (Israel) with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.]​

​

(c) Deny safe haven to any persons with respect to whom there is credible​

and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct;​

IF what you are doing is not a direct violation of the law, it is surely outside the spirit of the HRL. You are NOT trying to improve and strengthen the peace, but rather imply that hostilities are warranted, which is not the proper direction at all (To maintain international peace and security).

Furthermore, when YOU make absurd ad Hominem accusations, such as you have done here ("What dumbfuck wrote this?"), YOU are engaged in a fallacy that verbally abuses a member of the Discussion Group rather than logically addressing the content of the contribution for which YOU disagree.

I have cited and link the salient point to specific sources that you may examine at your leasure.

OK, I'm off the Soapbox,

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel is not a propper occupying power. Thay are still in the invasion phase.

link?

To argue that Israel is employing legitimate “self-defense” when it militarily attacks Gaza affords the occupying power the right to use both police and military force in occupied territory. An occupying power cannot justify military force as self-defense in territory for which it is responsible as the occupant. The problem is that Israel has never regulated its own behavior in the West Bank and Gaza as in accordance with Occupation Law.

No, Israel Does Not Have the Right to Self-Defense In International Law Against Occupied Palestinian Territory

[In view of Israel`s assertions that its current attacks on the Gaza Strip are an exercise in legitimate self-defense, Jadaliyya re-posts an analysis of this claim by Co-Editor Noura Erakat initially published in 2012.] On the fourth day of Israel`s

www.jadaliyya.com

That’s so silly. A couple of gee-had wannabes.

Israel Has No Right of Self-Defense Against Gaza

Israel has no legal right to use any kind of force in Gaza — under any circumstances.

jacobinmag.com

Indeed, just guessing here, but I think the Israelis will disagree that Islamic terrorist attacks proceed without response.

Indeed, still nothing on those “new states”?

The Palestinians' Right to Self-Defense - Truthdig

If the international community will not halt Israel's Gaza attack and war crimes then it must concede to the Palestinians the right to self-defense under the U.N. Charter.

www.truthdig.com

Explicit calls by various islamic terrorist franchises and by Hamas and Fatah for attacks on Israeli citizens is not self defense.

When you endorse such behavior on the part of the Arabs-Moslems, you have no case to be made for complaining about the Israeli response to stop those attacks.

Put your Pom Poms down.