Who are the Israelis?

[rylah]

WATCH: The Judean Desert overflows with rains of blessing

The initial overflow of the Qumran river
(footage: Israel nature and parks authority)

 

[Sixties Fan]

Arab Israeli Right-winger Wants To Be Safe | Israel Diaries

 

[Rigby5]

Align With Zion - AnaRina Heymann

There is no way of knowing where the city of David was, and the Temple Mount has nothing to do with David, was built 700 years later, and was of Roman construction, with king Herod being a Roman who converted to Judaism so that the Romans could make him king of the Jews.

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Align With Zion - AnaRina Heymann

There is no way of knowing where the city of David was, and the Temple Mount has nothing to do with David, was built 700 years later, and was of Roman construction, with king Herod being a Roman who converted to Judaism so that the Romans could make him king of the Jews.

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

 

[Rigby5]

We have a Who are the Palestinians thread, so just to be fair...

Golda Meir

Without reading this entire thread, the simple answer is, the Jews of today are Canaanites:

Full text of "The Two Seeds Of Genesis 3 15 By Charles Lee Mange"

Not possible.
Canaanites never left Palestine, there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, Canaanites did not go to Egypt, Canaanites for sure did not speak Hebrew, and the Hebrew claimed they invaded and murdered the Canaanites around 1000 BC, so the Hebrew can not at all possibly be Canaanites. The Hebrew did experience a sever drought that caused them to spend about 400 years in Egypt. So the Hebrew can not be Canaanites unless they were some offshoot who have left the land of Canaan much earlier.

Actually Canaanites did speak Hebrew, both at the time of Abraham Avinu and later,all of the places in the land remained Hebrew up until the return of the diaspora both from Egypt and today. Arabs simply transliterated them not knowing what they mean, as they don't know what the word Palestine means, or can correctly pronounce it till this day.

It's all Hebrew.

That's silly.
Hebrew is a minor offshoot of the Semitic language the Canaanites created, not the other way around.
An easy way to tell is that Hebrew did not have a written script until around 100 BC, while other Canaanite scripts, like Aramaic, Phoenician, etc., predate that by well over 1000 years.

And it is very ignorant to differentiate Hebrew from Arabs, since clearly Arabs came to the Land of Canaan first, the Canaanites were Arabs, and therefore so were the Hebrew.
The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group, of which Hebrew is a minor and more recent deviation.
The Arab Canaanites go back to 8000 BC in Jericho.

 

[Rigby5]

Align With Zion - AnaRina Heymann

There is no way of knowing where the city of David was, and the Temple Mount has nothing to do with David, was built 700 years later, and was of Roman construction, with king Herod being a Roman who converted to Judaism so that the Romans could make him king of the Jews.

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

Not only does no one know where David was born, but Bethlehem did not exist at that time, and David was a nomadic sheep herder.
The reasons we know there are no records of that time is that Hebrew did not have a written script for another 800 years, and all records were pretty much destroyed by the series of invasions, starting with the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC, and including the invasions by Babylonians, Assyrians, and Romans.
It was not just that record halls were looted and burned, but that all Hebrew were forced to leave with each takeover.
And clearly the Hebrew were NOT native.
They spent more time in Egypt than they ever did in the Land of Canaan.

 

[Sixties Fan]

We have a Who are the Palestinians thread, so just to be fair...

Golda Meir

Without reading this entire thread, the simple answer is, the Jews of today are Canaanites:

Full text of "The Two Seeds Of Genesis 3 15 By Charles Lee Mange"

Not possible.
Canaanites never left Palestine, there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, Canaanites did not go to Egypt, Canaanites for sure did not speak Hebrew, and the Hebrew claimed they invaded and murdered the Canaanites around 1000 BC, so the Hebrew can not at all possibly be Canaanites. The Hebrew did experience a sever drought that caused them to spend about 400 years in Egypt. So the Hebrew can not be Canaanites unless they were some offshoot who have left the land of Canaan much earlier.

Actually Canaanites did speak Hebrew, both at the time of Abraham Avinu and later,all of the places in the land remained Hebrew up until the return of the diaspora both from Egypt and today. Arabs simply transliterated them not knowing what they mean, as they don't know what the word Palestine means, or can correctly pronounce it till this day.

It's all Hebrew.

That's silly.
Hebrew is a minor offshoot of the Semitic language the Canaanites created, not the other way around.
An easy way to tell is that Hebrew did not have a written script until around 100 BC, while other Canaanite scripts, like Aramaic, Phoenician, etc., predate that by well over 1000 years.

And it is very ignorant to differentiate Hebrew from Arabs, since clearly Arabs came to the Land of Canaan first, the Canaanites were Arabs, and therefore so were the Hebrew.
The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group, of which Hebrew is a minor and more recent deviation.
The Arab Canaanites go back to 8000 BC in Jericho.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, an " The Arabs came to ancient Canaan first" firster.

Now, THAT history one cannot find in any ancient records, no matter how many rocks, tombs, mummies and any other ancient evidence one can find.

Ahhhh, thank for minimizing Hebrew to almost oblivion in Canaan.

Which is exactly your intention with all Jewish history and all Jews for that matter.

Jews

 

[rylah]

Sovereignty = Zionism = Stability
The retired officers recycle the magic of withdrawal and retreat, but reality is much more complex and the people are sober and demand sovereignty

Disseminating miracle solutions for complex problems is one of the major problems during the pre-election period. Parties seek to present solutions in slogans of up to four words to be emblazoned on billboards. But the public is smart and understands that complex situations require complex solutions.

These days we are in the midst of a well-financed (it is not yet clear by whom) campaign of intimidation in which former military authorities are seeking to return us to the blueprint of withdrawals and concessions and to instill fear in us from the vision of sovereignty in Judea and Samaria by wielding the sword of demography.

The same self-appointed “experts” are again trying to sell us the “Arab Peace Plan,” which includes a complete withdrawal from Judea and Samaria, East Jerusalem, and the Golan Heights and establishment of a Palestinian state whose capital is Jerusalem. These former officers conceal the fact that they are left-wingers who, in the past, supported every proposal calling for Israeli withdrawal and capitulation. That was the case in the Gaza Strip, that was the case in Lebanon, and that is what they sought to do in the Golan Heights. We are still today paying the price in blood for the consequences of those initiatives, Hezbollah threats and Hamas rockets.

Despite the respect for their past as officers, these are people lacking historical and political awareness, lacking understanding of the destiny of the Jewish people, and lacking familiarity with the Arab, Middle Eastern mentality according to which the one who capitulates and withdraws invites the next attack until he ultimately surrenders.
One does not need to be a security expert to understand the disaster latent in withdrawal from Judea and Samaria. The objective that the Arab leadership has unceasingly declared is establishment of greater Palestine that stretches from the Mediterranean to the Jordan. Iranian and jihadist forces from all over the world will enter this state that those “experts” are seeking to establish; missiles fired on Ben-Gurion Airport will become a daily occurrence, preventing planes from taking off. Millions of Arabs will stream from Jordan to Judea and Samaria and will create a full-fledged demographic threat, with their ultimate objective being a “return” to Yafo, Ramle, Haifa, and Ashdod. The world will see and will again and again demand more withdrawals in order to appease the angry Arab mob.

All this is before we mention our historical obligation to take possession of the Land of Israel. Jews cannot relinquish Judea! There is no moral validity to our presence in Ramat Aviv if we cede Beit El, Shechem and Hevron to foreign sovereignty.

(from a billboard campaign for Sovereignty)

Read full article: Sovereignty = Zionism = Stability

 

[Sixties Fan]

Align With Zion - AnaRina Heymann

There is no way of knowing where the city of David was, and the Temple Mount has nothing to do with David, was built 700 years later, and was of Roman construction, with king Herod being a Roman who converted to Judaism so that the Romans could make him king of the Jews.

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

Not only does no one know where David was born, but Bethlehem did not exist at that time, and David was a nomadic sheep herder.
The reasons we know there are no records of that time is that Hebrew did not have a written script for another 800 years, and all records were pretty much destroyed by the series of invasions, starting with the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC, and including the invasions by Babylonians, Assyrians, and Romans.
It was not just that record halls were looted and burned, but that all Hebrew were forced to leave with each takeover.
And clearly the Hebrew were NOT native.
They spent more time in Egypt than they ever did in the Land of Canaan.

Rest your mind.

That's it.

I promise you it will hurt much less that way.

Try destroying anyone else's ancient history and roots, and see what will happen.

But you won't, right? It is only those pesky Jews who must give up everything.

Their land, their history, their culture.

All of that to superior beings like yourself.

I can see your superiority all the way from Russia........

 

[Rigby5]

We have a Who are the Palestinians thread, so just to be fair...

Golda Meir

Without reading this entire thread, the simple answer is, the Jews of today are Canaanites:

Full text of "The Two Seeds Of Genesis 3 15 By Charles Lee Mange"

Not possible.
Canaanites never left Palestine, there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, Canaanites did not go to Egypt, Canaanites for sure did not speak Hebrew, and the Hebrew claimed they invaded and murdered the Canaanites around 1000 BC, so the Hebrew can not at all possibly be Canaanites. The Hebrew did experience a sever drought that caused them to spend about 400 years in Egypt. So the Hebrew can not be Canaanites unless they were some offshoot who have left the land of Canaan much earlier.

Actually Canaanites did speak Hebrew, both at the time of Abraham Avinu and later,all of the places in the land remained Hebrew up until the return of the diaspora both from Egypt and today. Arabs simply transliterated them not knowing what they mean, as they don't know what the word Palestine means, or can correctly pronounce it till this day.

It's all Hebrew.

That's silly.
Hebrew is a minor offshoot of the Semitic language the Canaanites created, not the other way around.
An easy way to tell is that Hebrew did not have a written script until around 100 BC, while other Canaanite scripts, like Aramaic, Phoenician, etc., predate that by well over 1000 years.

And it is very ignorant to differentiate Hebrew from Arabs, since clearly Arabs came to the Land of Canaan first, the Canaanites were Arabs, and therefore so were the Hebrew.
The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group, of which Hebrew is a minor and more recent deviation.
The Arab Canaanites go back to 8000 BC in Jericho.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, an " The Arabs came to ancient Canaan first" firster.

Now, THAT history one cannot find in any ancient records, no matter how many rocks, tombs, mummies and any other ancient evidence one can find.

Ahhhh, thank for minimizing Hebrew to almost oblivion in Canaan.

Which is exactly your intention with all Jewish history and all Jews for that matter.

Jews

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.
And not only are all the local ancient languages Semitic, such as Aramaic, Phoenician, Canaanite, etc., but clearly one has to cross Palestine in order to get to the Arabian Peninsula.
The origin and dissemination of language can be traced, and it is Palestine where all Arab cultures and Semitic languages developed. And Hebrew is not at all the source, but merely one of many.

Clearly you HAVE to at least already know that?
For there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, and yet the Hebrew did spend 400 years in Egypt due to a drought.
That can only mean they are not native to the Land of Canaan.
They had to come from somewhere else, before their stay in Egypt.

 

[Rigby5]

There is no way of knowing where the city of David was, and the Temple Mount has nothing to do with David, was built 700 years later, and was of Roman construction, with king Herod being a Roman who converted to Judaism so that the Romans could make him king of the Jews.

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

Not only does no one know where David was born, but Bethlehem did not exist at that time, and David was a nomadic sheep herder.
The reasons we know there are no records of that time is that Hebrew did not have a written script for another 800 years, and all records were pretty much destroyed by the series of invasions, starting with the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC, and including the invasions by Babylonians, Assyrians, and Romans.
It was not just that record halls were looted and burned, but that all Hebrew were forced to leave with each takeover.
And clearly the Hebrew were NOT native.
They spent more time in Egypt than they ever did in the Land of Canaan.

Rest your mind.

That's it.

I promise you it will hurt much less that way.

Try destroying anyone else's ancient history and roots, and see what will happen.

But you won't, right? It is only those pesky Jews who must give up everything.

Their land, their history, their culture.

All of that to superior beings like yourself.

I can see your superiority all the way from Russia........

Foolish.
There is no history or roots to destroy because the Hebrew clearly were nomadic and left no evidence of where they lived before Egypt.
And it certainly can't be the Land of Canaan because they it would not have been called the Land of Canaan, populated mostly by Canaanites.
And there can't be any history to destroy because the Hebrew tribes were essentially illiterate until the Romans, much later.

Nor do Russians have any direct connection since Yiddish is not even Semitic, but Germanic.
But I have to admit I am also Ashkenazi, so have no more claim to Palestine than you do.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Without reading this entire thread, the simple answer is, the Jews of today are Canaanites:

Full text of "The Two Seeds Of Genesis 3 15 By Charles Lee Mange"

Not possible.
Canaanites never left Palestine, there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, Canaanites did not go to Egypt, Canaanites for sure did not speak Hebrew, and the Hebrew claimed they invaded and murdered the Canaanites around 1000 BC, so the Hebrew can not at all possibly be Canaanites. The Hebrew did experience a sever drought that caused them to spend about 400 years in Egypt. So the Hebrew can not be Canaanites unless they were some offshoot who have left the land of Canaan much earlier.

Actually Canaanites did speak Hebrew, both at the time of Abraham Avinu and later,all of the places in the land remained Hebrew up until the return of the diaspora both from Egypt and today. Arabs simply transliterated them not knowing what they mean, as they don't know what the word Palestine means, or can correctly pronounce it till this day.

It's all Hebrew.

That's silly.
Hebrew is a minor offshoot of the Semitic language the Canaanites created, not the other way around.
An easy way to tell is that Hebrew did not have a written script until around 100 BC, while other Canaanite scripts, like Aramaic, Phoenician, etc., predate that by well over 1000 years.

And it is very ignorant to differentiate Hebrew from Arabs, since clearly Arabs came to the Land of Canaan first, the Canaanites were Arabs, and therefore so were the Hebrew.
The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group, of which Hebrew is a minor and more recent deviation.
The Arab Canaanites go back to 8000 BC in Jericho.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, an " The Arabs came to ancient Canaan first" firster.

Now, THAT history one cannot find in any ancient records, no matter how many rocks, tombs, mummies and any other ancient evidence one can find.

Ahhhh, thank for minimizing Hebrew to almost oblivion in Canaan.

Which is exactly your intention with all Jewish history and all Jews for that matter.

Jews

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.
And not only are all the local ancient languages Semitic, such as Aramaic, Phoenician, Canaanite, etc., but clearly one has to cross Palestine in order to get to the Arabian Peninsula.
The origin and dissemination of language can be traced, and it is Palestine where all Arab cultures and Semitic languages developed. And Hebrew is not at all the source, but merely one of many.

Clearly you HAVE to at least already know that?
For there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, and yet the Hebrew did spend 400 years in Egypt due to a drought.
That can only mean they are not native to the Land of Canaan.
They had to come from somewhere else, before their stay in Egypt.

Seriously, see your psychiatrist very early in the morning.

Tell them that you are in the habit of stealing anything Jewish and you need a 12 step in order to stop doing it.

Your fixation must be taken care of.

Good luck.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Aside from the fact that Kind David PBUH purchased the mountain?
Then again arguing about ancient borders of the city is of no relevance, since Jerusalem has already spread way further than it ever was, under any foreign rule, and as promised will spread further.

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

Not only does no one know where David was born, but Bethlehem did not exist at that time, and David was a nomadic sheep herder.
The reasons we know there are no records of that time is that Hebrew did not have a written script for another 800 years, and all records were pretty much destroyed by the series of invasions, starting with the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC, and including the invasions by Babylonians, Assyrians, and Romans.
It was not just that record halls were looted and burned, but that all Hebrew were forced to leave with each takeover.
And clearly the Hebrew were NOT native.
They spent more time in Egypt than they ever did in the Land of Canaan.

Rest your mind.

That's it.

I promise you it will hurt much less that way.

Try destroying anyone else's ancient history and roots, and see what will happen.

But you won't, right? It is only those pesky Jews who must give up everything.

Their land, their history, their culture.

All of that to superior beings like yourself.

I can see your superiority all the way from Russia........

Foolish.
There is no history or roots to destroy because the Hebrew clearly were nomadic and left no evidence of where they lived before Egypt.
And it certainly can't be the Land of Canaan because they it would not have been called the Land of Canaan, populated mostly by Canaanites.
And there can't be any history to destroy because the Hebrew tribes were essentially illiterate until the Romans, much later.

Nor do Russians have any direct connection since Yiddish is not even Semitic, but Germanic.
But I have to admit I am also Ashkenazi, so have no more claim to Palestine than you do.

Oooooooh, the " I am ashkenazi , so I know what I am talking about and you should listen to me" shtick.

Add that to talk about with your psychiatrist .

 

[Rigby5]

That is silly because not only are there no records from that time period, but king David was the foreign invader, so would not have purchased anything. There are several mountains as well.

King David was born in Bethlehem.

Which makes you a strange person for calling him a foreigner to his own ancestral home.

No records of that period. Your source to that is what? The same one which told you that King David was a foreigner to the Land or Israel, Ancient Canaan?

Not only does no one know where David was born, but Bethlehem did not exist at that time, and David was a nomadic sheep herder.
The reasons we know there are no records of that time is that Hebrew did not have a written script for another 800 years, and all records were pretty much destroyed by the series of invasions, starting with the Hebrew invasion around 1000 BC, and including the invasions by Babylonians, Assyrians, and Romans.
It was not just that record halls were looted and burned, but that all Hebrew were forced to leave with each takeover.
And clearly the Hebrew were NOT native.
They spent more time in Egypt than they ever did in the Land of Canaan.

Rest your mind.

That's it.

I promise you it will hurt much less that way.

Try destroying anyone else's ancient history and roots, and see what will happen.

But you won't, right? It is only those pesky Jews who must give up everything.

Their land, their history, their culture.

All of that to superior beings like yourself.

I can see your superiority all the way from Russia........

Foolish.
There is no history or roots to destroy because the Hebrew clearly were nomadic and left no evidence of where they lived before Egypt.
And it certainly can't be the Land of Canaan because they it would not have been called the Land of Canaan, populated mostly by Canaanites.
And there can't be any history to destroy because the Hebrew tribes were essentially illiterate until the Romans, much later.

Nor do Russians have any direct connection since Yiddish is not even Semitic, but Germanic.
But I have to admit I am also Ashkenazi, so have no more claim to Palestine than you do.

Oooooooh, the " I am ashkenazi , so I know what I am talking about and you should listen to me" shtick.

Add that to talk about with your psychiatrist .

That is silly because one can be Ashkenazi and still be ignorant or a liar.
My point is that I have no motive to lie since revealing Hebrew tribes as sleazy invaders reflects badly on me as well.

Since the Hebrew went to Egypt to weather the drought, it is most likely they were previously living in the Sinai. For only from the Sinai would Egypt be the nearest haven from a drought, and there is no known drought anywhere except the Sinai.
That also is most likely since that is where the Hebrew returned to after leaving Egypt.

 

[rylah]

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.

Indeed, this is silly,
even the Arabs call it "The JEWISH Desert":


Sahara Yahudin
The Judaean Desert or Judean Desert (Hebrew: Midbar Yehuda, both Desert of Judah or Judaean Desert; Arabic:Sahara Yahudan) is a desert in Israel and the West Bank that lies east of Jerusalem and descends to the Dead Sea. It stretches from the northeastern Negev to the east of Beit El, and is marked by natural terraces with escarpments. It ends in a steep escarpment dropping to the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. The Judaean Desert is crossed by numerous wadis from northeast to southeast[dubious – discuss] and has many ravines, most of them deep, from 1,200 feet in the west to 600 feet in the east.[1] The Judaean Desert is an area with a special morphological structure along the east of the Judaean Mountains.

 

[Rigby5]

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.

Indeed, this is silly,
even the Arabs call it "The JEWISH Desert":


Sahara Yahudin
The Judaean Desert or Judean Desert (Hebrew: Midbar Yehuda, both Desert of Judah or Judaean Desert; Arabic:Sahara Yahudan) is a desert in Israel and the West Bank that lies east of Jerusalem and descends to the Dead Sea. It stretches from the northeastern Negev to the east of Beit El, and is marked by natural terraces with escarpments. It ends in a steep escarpment dropping to the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. The Judaean Desert is crossed by numerous wadis from northeast to southeast[dubious – discuss] and has many ravines, most of them deep, from 1,200 feet in the west to 600 feet in the east.[1] The Judaean Desert is an area with a special morphological structure along the east of the Judaean Mountains.
...

That is ridiculous.
The Jews were names AFTER Judea, not the other way around.
Jew were Hebrew until they lived in Judea long enough for people to start calling them Jews because of their association with Judea.
We are Hebrew, not Jews.
We do NOT come from Judea.
There is no record of us in Judea before around 1200 BC or so.
The Canaanites, Chaldeans, Amorites, Akkadians, etc., go back many thousands of years earlier.

 

[Sixties Fan]

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.

Indeed, this is silly,
even the Arabs call it "The JEWISH Desert":


Sahara Yahudin
The Judaean Desert or Judean Desert (Hebrew: Midbar Yehuda, both Desert of Judah or Judaean Desert; Arabic:Sahara Yahudan) is a desert in Israel and the West Bank that lies east of Jerusalem and descends to the Dead Sea. It stretches from the northeastern Negev to the east of Beit El, and is marked by natural terraces with escarpments. It ends in a steep escarpment dropping to the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. The Judaean Desert is crossed by numerous wadis from northeast to southeast[dubious – discuss] and has many ravines, most of them deep, from 1,200 feet in the west to 600 feet in the east.[1] The Judaean Desert is an area with a special morphological structure along the east of the Judaean Mountains.
...

That is ridiculous.
The Jews were names AFTER Judea, not the other way around.
Jew were Hebrew until they lived in Judea long enough for people to start calling them Jews because of their association with Judea.
We are Hebrew, not Jews.
We do NOT come from Judea.
There is no record of us in Judea before around 1200 BC or so.
The Canaanites, Chaldeans, Amorites, Akkadians, etc., go back many thousands of years earlier.

You do not come from ANYWHERE close to the Land of Israel.

Get a grip on yourself and start telling us where your ancestors really come from so that we can deconstruct their history, culture and language the same way you are endlessly trying to do with ours.

Your knowledge about the history of the Jewish people is BEYOND pathetic.

 

[rylah]

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.

Indeed, this is silly,
even the Arabs call it "The JEWISH Desert":


Sahara Yahudin
The Judaean Desert or Judean Desert (Hebrew: Midbar Yehuda, both Desert of Judah or Judaean Desert; Arabic:Sahara Yahudan) is a desert in Israel and the West Bank that lies east of Jerusalem and descends to the Dead Sea. It stretches from the northeastern Negev to the east of Beit El, and is marked by natural terraces with escarpments. It ends in a steep escarpment dropping to the Dead Sea and the Jordan Valley. The Judaean Desert is crossed by numerous wadis from northeast to southeast[dubious – discuss] and has many ravines, most of them deep, from 1,200 feet in the west to 600 feet in the east.[1] The Judaean Desert is an area with a special morphological structure along the east of the Judaean Mountains.
...

That is ridiculous.
The Jews were names AFTER Judea, not the other way around.
Jew were Hebrew until they lived in Judea long enough for people to start calling them Jews because of their association with Judea.
We are Hebrew, not Jews.
We do NOT come from Judea.
There is no record of us in Judea before around 1200 BC or so.
The Canaanites, Chaldeans, Amorites, Akkadians, etc., go back many thousands of years earlier.

Sure and there's no record of Indians before they moved to Central Park...
You're not the first obsessed idiot who attempted this nonsense ,certainly not the last one to cross the Jews on our path...eventually all those who tried went down in shame to the same dustbin of history.

Do You need WAZE to navigate there faster?

 

[Ria_Longhorn]

Without reading this entire thread, the simple answer is, the Jews of today are Canaanites:

Full text of "The Two Seeds Of Genesis 3 15 By Charles Lee Mange"

Not possible.
Canaanites never left Palestine, there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, Canaanites did not go to Egypt, Canaanites for sure did not speak Hebrew, and the Hebrew claimed they invaded and murdered the Canaanites around 1000 BC, so the Hebrew can not at all possibly be Canaanites. The Hebrew did experience a sever drought that caused them to spend about 400 years in Egypt. So the Hebrew can not be Canaanites unless they were some offshoot who have left the land of Canaan much earlier.

Actually Canaanites did speak Hebrew, both at the time of Abraham Avinu and later,all of the places in the land remained Hebrew up until the return of the diaspora both from Egypt and today. Arabs simply transliterated them not knowing what they mean, as they don't know what the word Palestine means, or can correctly pronounce it till this day.

It's all Hebrew.

That's silly.
Hebrew is a minor offshoot of the Semitic language the Canaanites created, not the other way around.
An easy way to tell is that Hebrew did not have a written script until around 100 BC, while other Canaanite scripts, like Aramaic, Phoenician, etc., predate that by well over 1000 years.

And it is very ignorant to differentiate Hebrew from Arabs, since clearly Arabs came to the Land of Canaan first, the Canaanites were Arabs, and therefore so were the Hebrew.
The word "Semitic" means of an Arab language group, of which Hebrew is a minor and more recent deviation.
The Arab Canaanites go back to 8000 BC in Jericho.

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh, an " The Arabs came to ancient Canaan first" firster.

Now, THAT history one cannot find in any ancient records, no matter how many rocks, tombs, mummies and any other ancient evidence one can find.

Ahhhh, thank for minimizing Hebrew to almost oblivion in Canaan.

Which is exactly your intention with all Jewish history and all Jews for that matter.

Jews

That is silly.
Clearly it is the Land of Canaan, not the Land of Judah.
And not only are all the local ancient languages Semitic, such as Aramaic, Phoenician, Canaanite, etc., but clearly one has to cross Palestine in order to get to the Arabian Peninsula.
The origin and dissemination of language can be traced, and it is Palestine where all Arab cultures and Semitic languages developed. And Hebrew is not at all the source, but merely one of many.

Clearly you HAVE to at least already know that?
For there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, and yet the Hebrew did spend 400 years in Egypt due to a drought.
That can only mean they are not native to the Land of Canaan.
They had to come from somewhere else, before their stay in Egypt.

Rigby6 writes:
"For there was no drought in the Land of Canaan, and yet the Hebrew did spend 400 years in Egypt due to a drought. That can only mean they are not native to the Land of Canaan. They had to come from somewhere else, before their stay in Egypt."
= = = = = = =

Ria Longhorn:

Where did you get this piece of information from?

 

[rylah]

Fear not Israel, fear not

Fear not Israel, fear not
For you are a lion cub
And a lion if he roars - who does tremble?

Fear not Israel, fear not
For you are a lion cub
Fear not Israel, and don't be afraid
For you are never alone
Dwelling heavens the Only and Unique G-d
Keeps us from all evil forever
Protects us during the night and day
Safeguards us in all times and in every place
On land, in the air, and in the sea,
Shields us from everyone

"Fear not Israel, fear not
Hashem keeps you from all evil
Do not fear Israel, fear not,
Hashem will answer you on the day of trouble

Fear not Israel and don't worry
For you are a virtuous people and a holy nation
Hashem the Good won't forsake his people
Shields us from heel to head
He kept our fathers in the desert
Always overpowered their enemies and haters
The Great Mighty and Awesome G-d
He redeems us from trouble

"Hashem is your Guardian; Hashem shadows you by your right hand
...Hashem will guard your going and coming from now and to eternity." (Tehilim 121)