white silence = racism

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
55,066
Reaction score
16,809
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
Whites kneeling in mass to ask forgiveness? Whites forgiving looters and fire starters because its "understandable"?
There have been more people killed in the protesting & riots than blacks killed by cops this year. How the fuck does that make sense?
Who and how did the white race become so cucked?

So now anyone who doesn't bow down to this radical bullshit is a racist?

You people have no common sense. I agree that police brutality is a problem but I'll be damned if I'm going to join your cause when you muddy the message with all the white guilt bullshit.

This is a modern day Reign of Terror. The Church of Woke is yet another cult which terrorizes people with ritual humiliation. It's an old story.
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
55,066
Reaction score
16,809
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
There's a difference between actually being a racist and enabling racism.

Racism is enabled when it's dismissed, minimized and deflected from. When people refuse to hold other people accountable for it. Something we see on USMB pretty regularly.

Personally, I think that those who enable it are worse in the big picture.
Police brutality isn't exclusive to blacks. This isn't about skin color. The problem will NEVER be fixed because you idiots aren't smart enough to focus on the REAL issue.
No one said it was exclusive to Blacks. The point is that it was encouraged, honed, and perfected on Blacks for centuries. Idiots like you arent smart enough to understand or admit to it.
You are seriously ignorant of history.
 

whitehall

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
45,046
Reaction score
8,747
Points
2,040
Location
Western Va.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.
 

Tumblin Tumbleweed

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
8,138
Reaction score
1,375
Points
170
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
55,066
Reaction score
16,809
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
Not clowning you. :)

Lets just say I have my reasons.

I literally believe there would be a civil war like revolt if Black people were ever in power and whites were still the majority of the population. I see absolutely no way that would be tolerated but it may be me just being pessimistic. However, its not the reality now nor has it ever been the reality in the US. Hence my stance on racism.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
 

progressive hunter

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
15,782
Reaction score
3,328
Points
290
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
Yeah I saw that. No one forced them to kneel. That shit looks hella awkard. I would have told them to get their asses up and do some real shit like reparations.
 

Tumblin Tumbleweed

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
8,138
Reaction score
1,375
Points
170
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
Not clowning you. :)

Lets just say I have my reasons.

I literally believe there would be a civil war like revolt if Black people were ever in power and whites were still the majority of the population. I see absolutely no way that would be tolerated but it may be me just being pessimistic. However, its not the reality now nor has it ever been the reality in the US. Hence my stance on racism.
I get it, believe me. I also understand the pessimism. I have an unhealthy amount of it myself at times. I'm in a mixed race marriage, therefore, I've been called a traitor to my race and a filthy race mixer. The worst of the worst to most cracker ass Cult45 crackers on this very board. I embrace their outrage and shame. I say we just fuck the melanin right out of ourselves. :04: I wear it as a badge of honor.
 

progressive hunter

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
15,782
Reaction score
3,328
Points
290
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
Yeah I saw that. No one forced them to kneel. That shit looks hella awkard. I would have told them to get their asses up and do some real shit like reparations.
by the look of the goons standing over them they sure didnt do it voluntarily,,,
 

Tumblin Tumbleweed

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
8,138
Reaction score
1,375
Points
170
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
In my opinion, this kind of publicity stunt does absolutely nothing to improve race relations.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
Not clowning you. :)

Lets just say I have my reasons.

I literally believe there would be a civil war like revolt if Black people were ever in power and whites were still the majority of the population. I see absolutely no way that would be tolerated but it may be me just being pessimistic. However, its not the reality now nor has it ever been the reality in the US. Hence my stance on racism.
I get it, believe me. I also understand the pessimism. I have an unhealthy amount of it myself at times. I'm in a mixed race marriage, therefore, I've been called a traitor and a filthy race mixer. The worst of the worst to most cracker ass Cult45 crackers on this very board. I embrace their outrage and shame. I say we just fuck the melanin right out of ourselves. :04: I wear it as a badge of honor.
Yeah. I have a white daughter. (Long story) and she hears some of the vilest shit from other whites because she prefers Black guys.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
Yeah I saw that. No one forced them to kneel. That shit looks hella awkard. I would have told them to get their asses up and do some real shit like reparations.
by the look of the goons standing over them they sure didnt do it voluntarily,,,
Thats just your fear talking. You see a Black man and you instinctively get frightened. I get it though.
 

progressive hunter

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2018
Messages
15,782
Reaction score
3,328
Points
290
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
In my opinion, this kind of publicity stunt does absolutely nothing to improve race relations.
A smart black person would look at this for what it is and reject it,,,only vile and hateful people would look down at them and think good thoughts,,,and those looking on seem to be happy about it,,,
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
In my opinion, this kind of publicity stunt does absolutely nothing to improve race relations.
I think its more for the white people than the Black people. Asking for forgiveness always is.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
In my opinion, this kind of publicity stunt does absolutely nothing to improve race relations.
A smart black person would look at this for what it is and reject it,,,only vile and hateful people would look down at them and think good thoughts,,,and those looking on seem to be happy about it,,,
Most of them either look very uncomfortable or theyre crying.
 

boedicca

Uppity Water Nymph
Joined
Feb 12, 2007
Messages
55,066
Reaction score
16,809
Points
2,250
Location
The Land of Funk
The term " white silence" opens up an interesting avenue for discussion. First of all, how do you determine "silence" in a political/social venue? Think about it, it boils down to the media. The Germans in the 30's were silent about the Holocaust because their only source of information available at the time either ignored it or justified the atrocities. The same goes for today's media. If anarchy and revolution is justified by the media it will seem as if we live in a society of "white silence" but it's not true.. The problem for the left wing media and the angry democrat party that seems to justify anarchy is that there are other venues of information besides ABC, CBS, MSNBC, PBS, CNN and rag media like NYT and WAPO.

That's not the context of "silence". When white people are forced to kneel and denounce their "privilege" the purpose is humiliation and subjugation. That is not at all equivalent to Germans' silence about the Holocaust.
No white people were forced to kneel. I dont even know where that came from.
You aren't very observant, bub.
 

Asclepias

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2013
Messages
105,331
Reaction score
12,384
Points
2,195
Location
Breathing rarified air.
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
Not clowning you. :)

Lets just say I have my reasons.

I literally believe there would be a civil war like revolt if Black people were ever in power and whites were still the majority of the population. I see absolutely no way that would be tolerated but it may be me just being pessimistic. However, its not the reality now nor has it ever been the reality in the US. Hence my stance on racism.
I get it, believe me. I also understand the pessimism. I have an unhealthy amount of it myself at times. I'm in a mixed race marriage, therefore, I've been called a traitor and a filthy race mixer. The worst of the worst to most cracker ass Cult45 crackers on this very board. I embrace their outrage and shame. I say we just fuck the melanin right out of ourselves. :04: I wear it as a badge of honor.
Yeah. I have a white daughter. (Long story) and she hears some of the vilest shit from other whites because she prefers Black guys.
so shes racist too,,,
She'd kick your ass I know that.
 

Tumblin Tumbleweed

Gold Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
8,138
Reaction score
1,375
Points
170
Who controls congress? White people or Black people?
If you're speaking of majorities, you already know the answer to that question. So, are you clowning me? If so, not cool. More black people in politics, not less, will even the battlefield in the long run. Congress has always been a numbers majority game. I have no doubt you already know this.

I didnt say that was the goal. What I am saying is that Black people will never have that power. We lack the power, numbers, and resources to implement a system that benefits us over another race.
I guess that's another area where we fundamentally disagree. I hate using the word never. Never solves nothing.
Not clowning you. :)

Lets just say I have my reasons.

I literally believe there would be a civil war like revolt if Black people were ever in power and whites were still the majority of the population. I see absolutely no way that would be tolerated but it may be me just being pessimistic. However, its not the reality now nor has it ever been the reality in the US. Hence my stance on racism.
I get it, believe me. I also understand the pessimism. I have an unhealthy amount of it myself at times. I'm in a mixed race marriage, therefore, I've been called a traitor and a filthy race mixer. The worst of the worst to most cracker ass Cult45 crackers on this very board. I embrace their outrage and shame. I say we just fuck the melanin right out of ourselves. :04: I wear it as a badge of honor.
Yeah. I have a white daughter. (Long story) and she hears some of the vilest shit from other whites because she prefers Black guys.
I bet! We could become a nation of beautiful caramel children encompassing the very best elements of both races. What a tragedy that would be, amirite? :04:
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top