Zone1 "White privilege" does not exist, it is a lie.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Exactly.

On the whole when decent people raise decent children those children will grow up to be successful in life because they learn to be responsible, smart, have values, speak English well, have standards, work and learn to increase their value and thus increase their pay.

That's why on the whole white people succeed more because on the whole they had parents that raised them to be better. The people who raised me were middle america people grew up in the 50s when a man was a man, when women were women, when you worked hard and did what was right, and kids were raised to be tough and strong.
So you all consider raising children who are racist and believe that because they are white they are superior to those who are not white "good parenting"?

What do you think normal white people think of these alleged superior parenting skills? You think they appreciate you making those of them who aren't racist look bad by simple association?
 
Last edited:
Bullshit. Every white has lost opportunities because of preferential treatment for minorities. Doors were closed to us soley because of our skin color.
Why are you all not complaining about all of the high paying jobs in the tech industry being given away to H1-B visa holders? That's where a huge portion of high paying jobs are being lost that were normally held predominantly by white males, jobs tinkering with computers & code that pay in the range of $175,000 to $250,000.

There are several companies created solely to facilitate this pipeline and they have training programs to teach candidate how to ace their FANG interviews although our laws state that they are supposed to already be qualified in order to be issued the visa and that the company has to attest to the fact that there are no qualified candidates in the area that they can hire.

A lot of bullshit going on surrounding this, and I have yet to hear any of you complaining about the Asian Indians replacing you.

In order to be eligible for the H1B visa, you will need:
  • A valid job offer from a U.S. employer for a role that requires specialty knowledge.
  • Proof of a bachelor's degree or equivalent experience in that field.
  • Your employer must show that there is a lack of qualified U.S. applicants for the role.
 
  • Brilliant
Reactions: IM2
Tell me about the Fertile Crescent. Who populated it?
No. I have no reason to do a report for you.

The fact is that whites were not the inhabitants of the fertile crescent.
 
Why are you all not complaining about all of the high paying jobs in the tech industry being given away to H1-B visa holders? That's where a huge portion of high paying jobs are being lost that were normally held predominantly by white males, jobs tinkering with computers & code that pay in the range of $175,000 to $250,000.

There are several companies created solely to facilitate this pipeline and they have training programs to teach candidate how to ace their FANG interviews although are laws state that they are supposed to already be qualified in order to be issued the visa and that the company has to attest to the fact that there are no qualified candidates in the area that they can hire.
A lot of bullshit going on surrounding this, and I have yet to hear any of you complaining about the Asian Indians replacing you.

In order to be eligible for the H1B visa, you will need:
  • A valid job offer from a U.S. employer for a role that requires specialty knowledge.
  • Proof of a bachelor's degree or equivalent experience in that field.
  • Your employer must show that there is a lack of qualified U.S. applicants for the role.
Seems like they are fine for racial preferences to everyone unless they are black.
 
IM2 said I do not know anything about the Fertile Crescent, and that it was not populated by whites.

He probably wants me to believe that Negroes created the civilizations of Egypt, Sumeria, Assyria, and Babylon were created by Negroes.
I DGAF what you don't want to believe. Those civilizations you named were not created by whites. The first Egyptians were indeed blacks of all shades. Your belief in white supremacy has made you stupid.
 
Obviously, black people are superior excuse-makers. I surrender civilization.
 
Oh….i guess special exception is made for you, as usual. Black Privilege.

And the colorblind folks aren’t criticizing me because they know I’ve said nothing racist. Opposing DIE and AA is not racist - it’s the opposite of racism. It’s colorblind.
There is no black privillege here and if anyone has been gven prvilege its you. You have blatanty posted racist comentary in this zone, both you and hector. You are not colorblind, and your assumption that AA and DEI only goes to unquaified blacks is racist. Especially because white women such as you have been the main beneficiaries. You were an AA and DEI hire.

There are four dfferent shades here and moderatrs use one. I have not used the moderator red. But you would rather whine than to try me in a debate because you know that head up, I will destroy you.
 
There is no black privillege here and if anyone has been gven prvilege its you. You have blatanty posted racist comentary in this zone, both you and hector.
I feel excluded. It’s very hurtful.

Is that what black people feel like?
 
This is the Fertile Crescent. Agriculture was begun here nearly eleven thousand years ago. Civilization was begun here nearly six thousand years ago. Both were begun by Caucasians. The only Negroes who lived here were brought as slaves, with the exception of one century when Egypt had a Negro dynasty.

View attachment 977716
We all know where the fertile crescent was Humphrey. And the fact is that caucasians had little to do with those civilizations.

Cheikh Anta Diop destroyed your version of history and he did so credibly. So have men like Walter Rodney. So just like your opinon on IQ is old and debunked, so is your opinion of the orgin of civilization.

"Archaeology on the African continent has a long history of profound racism, as discussed in Karega-Munene and Schmidt 2010; and Stahl 2005, whether explicitly, as when dismissing connections between living African people and the archaeological evidence of past societies or implicitly, as when contemporary populations are dismissed as relative newcomers or treated as timeless avatars of an unchanging African past."


Archaeology is rooted in racism and colonialism, say scientists. Here's how we rewrite 'everyone's history'​



This is how far whites have tried revising history n orderto create or preserve a white supremacist tall tale.

“One major author on the slave trade (appropriately titled Sins of Our Fathers) explained how many white people urged him to state that the trade was the responsibility of African chiefs, and that Europeans merely turned up to buy captives- as though without European demand there would have been captives sitting on the beach by the millions!
- Walter Rodney

This is going to be fun. I am going to make an example out of you Humphrey.
 
There is no black privillege here and if anyone has been gven prvilege its you. You have blatanty posted racist comentary in this zone, both you and hector. You are not colorblind, and your assumption that AA and DEI only goes to unquaified blacks is racist. Especially because white women such as you have been the main beneficiaries. You were an AA and DEI hire.

There are four dfferent shades here and moderatrs use one. I have not used the moderator red. But you would rather whine than to try me in a debate because you know that head up, I will destroy you.
I’ve said nothing racist other than oppose systemic favoritism for people based on race through programs such as DEI and AA .

And it’s quite noticeable that you demonstrate more hatred for me, thr Jew, than people who have posted actual racist comments. I’m beginning to think you’re a sock for Coyote.

And believe me, I was not an AA hire. That is every bit as racist as if someone said that EVERY black is an AA hire. A black who, for example, graduated Phi Beta Kappa and won national awards for her work throughout her career obviously got hired based on merit. But a whitey with those credentials? Oh no….only reason she got hired is because she’s a whitey.

Now STFU about calling people racist, and trying to bait them, in a Zone 1 thread.
 
Last edited:
And it’s quite noticeable that your demonstrate more hatred for me, thr Jew, than people who have posted actual racist comments. I’m beginning to think you’re a sock for Coyote.

Be careful. You’ll be accused of self victimisation.

That old chestnut. :icon_sjung:
 
Be careful. You’ll be accused of self victimisation.

That old chestnut. :icon_sjung:
So true!

Every once in a while, IM2 will post quotes from several members that are actually quite racist. There has never been a quote from me, and that’s because I’ve never said anything racist for him to quote. Quite telling, then, that I’m the one he goes after, isn’t it?

One time someone said a horribly racist thing, and IM2 referred to that comment, and attacked ME - even knowing the other poster said it. The antisemitism runs deep.

I don’t even think they are able to see it. It’s like the leftists blaming Israel and then insisting it has nothing to do with antisemitism. Their anti-Jew bias drives them, and they can’t see it.
 
Seems like they are fine for racial preferences to everyone unless they are black.
Blacks benefit disproptionately from AA. The winning combo is a female black. If she’s even average in ability, she will get the job over a male black, or a white of either gender. That’s why we ended up with an idiot as the Vice President.

I’m glad Trump didn’t pick based on race or gender. He could have picked the black woman stocking shelves (who BIDEN referred to), in order to pander to blacks.

No more pandering once Trump is back in. Everyone succeeds or fails by merit or lack thereof.
 
Blacks benefit disproptionately from AA. The winning combo is a female black. If she’s even average in ability, she will get the job over a male black, or a white of either gender. That’s why we ended up with an idiot as the Vice President.

I’m glad Trump didn’t pick based on race or gender. He could have picked the black woman stocking shelves (who BIDEN referred to), in order to pander to blacks.

No more pandering once Trump is back in. Everyone succeeds or fails by merit or lack thereof.
Thats a lie Edith. All documentation shows that white women have been the disproportionate recipients of the policy. They have been the winning ticket. A racist can hire a white female and meet EEOC standards while keeping everything white. You are one of them. Trump did pick based on race and gender. White is a race, male is a gender. Ben Carson, Tim Scott and Marco Rubio were more qualified than JD Vance. Vance is not there on merit.
 
So true!

Every once in a while, IM2 will post quotes from several members that are actually quite racist. There has never been a quote from me, and that’s because I’ve never said anything racist for him to quote. Quite telling, then, that I’m the one he goes after, isn’t it?

One time someone said a horribly racist thing, and IM2 referred to that comment, and attacked ME - even knowing the other poster said it. The antisemitism runs deep.

I don’t even think they are able to see it. It’s like the leftists blaming Israel and then insisting it has nothing to do with antisemitism. Their anti-Jew bias drives them, and they can’t see it.
Edith, you have consistently made racist comments.

Here is one you just made.

Blacks benefit disproptionately from AA. The winning combo is a female black. If she’s even average in ability, she will get the job over a male black, or a white of either gender. That’s why we ended up with an idiot as the Vice President.
 
We all know where the fertile crescent was Humphrey. And the fact is that caucasians had little to do with those civilizations.

Cheikh Anta Diop destroyed your version of history and he did so credibly. So have men like Walter Rodney. So just like your opinon on IQ is old and debunked, so is your opinion of the orgin of civilization.

"Archaeology on the African continent has a long history of profound racism, as discussed in Karega-Munene and Schmidt 2010; and Stahl 2005, whether explicitly, as when dismissing connections between living African people and the archaeological evidence of past societies or implicitly, as when contemporary populations are dismissed as relative newcomers or treated as timeless avatars of an unchanging African past."


Archaeology is rooted in racism and colonialism, say scientists. Here's how we rewrite 'everyone's history'​



This is how far whites have tried revising history n orderto create or preserve a white supremacist tall tale.

“One major author on the slave trade (appropriately titled Sins of Our Fathers) explained how many white people urged him to state that the trade was the responsibility of African chiefs, and that Europeans merely turned up to buy captives- as though without European demand there would have been captives sitting on the beach by the millions!
- Walter Rodney

This is going to be fun. I am going to make an example out of you Humphrey.
When it comes to believing nonsense simply because you want you you are worse than JoeB131. The earliest civilizations were created by whites, and then Orientals. Negroes never contributed to civilization. Now they are having trouble adopting white civilization.
 
I DGAF what you don't want to believe. Those civilizations you named were not created by whites. The first Egyptians were indeed blacks of all shades. Your belief in white supremacy has made you stupid.
This is an ancient Egyptian. She does not look like a Negro to me.

EgyptianArt.webp
 
The Washington Post, May 30, 2017

“DNA from ancient Egyptian mummies reveals their ancestry”



By Ben Guarino

May 30, 2017 at 3:33 PM EDT

Ancient Egyptians were an archaeologist's dream. They left behind intricate coffins, massive pyramids and gorgeous hieroglyphs, the pictorial writing code cracked in 1799. Egyptians recorded tales of royalty and gods. They jotted down life's miscellanies, too, as humdrum as beer recipes and doctor's notes.

But there was one persistent hole in ancient Egyptian identity: their chromosomes. Cool, dry permafrost can preserve prehistoric DNA like a natural freezer, but Egypt is a gene incinerator. The region is hot. Within the mummies' tombs, where scientists would hope to find genetic samples, humidity wrecked their DNA. What's more, soda ash and other chemicals used by Egyptian embalmers damaged genetic material.

A study led by researchers at the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History and the University of Tubingen in Germany managed to plug some of those genetic gaps. Researchers wrung genetic material from 151 Egyptian mummies, radiocarbon dated between Egypt's New Kingdom (the oldest at 1388 B.C.) to the Roman Period (the youngest at 426 A.D.), as reported Tuesday in the journal Nature Communications.

AD

Johannes Krause, a University of Tubingen paleogeneticist and an author of the study, said the major finding was that “for 1,300 years, we see complete genetic continuity.” Despite repeated conquests of Egypt, by Alexander the Great, Greeks, Romans, Arabs and Assyrians — the list goes on — ancient Egyptians showed little genetic change. “The other big surprise,” Krause said, “was we didn't find much sub-Saharan African ancestry.”

The remains came from Abusir el-Meleq, an ancient Nile community in the middle of Egypt. From the mummies the scientists extracted bone, teeth and soft tissue samples. (Although Egyptian embalmers removed the brains of the deceased, the scientists wrote that “in most cases, non-macerated mummy heads still have much of their soft tissue preserved.”)

The hard samples yielded the most DNA, perhaps because the teeth and bones were protected by soft tissue or because the embalming processes left tougher material intact. After preparing the samples in a sterilized room in Germany, the researchers bathed the samples in UV radiation for an hour to minimize contamination.

AD

Ancient Egyptians were closely related to people who lived along the eastern Mediterranean, the analysis showed. They also shared genetic material with residents of the Turkish peninsula at the time and Europe.

Given Egypt's location at the intersection of Africa, Europe and Asia, and the influx of foreign rulers, Krause said he was surprised at how stable the genetics seemed to be over this period. The scientists were particularly interested in the change in ruling class at the turn of the first millennium. First came the Hellenistic dynasty, in the aftermath of Alexander the Great’s conquests, from 332 B.C. to 30 B.C., and then Roman rule from 30 B.C. to about 400 A.D. And yet the genetics of the Abusir el-Meleq community appeared to be unperturbed by shifting politics.

The scientists compared these ancient genetics with those of 100 modern Egyptians and 125 modern Ethiopians that had been previously analyzed. If you ask Egyptians, they'll say that they have become more European recently, Krause said. “We see exactly the opposite,” he said.

AD

It was not until relatively recently in Egypt's long history that sub-Saharan genetic influences became more pronounced. “In the last 1,500 years, Egypt became more African, if you want,” Krause said.

In their paper, the researchers acknowledged that “all our genetic data were obtained from a single site in Middle Egypt and may not be representative for all of ancient Egypt.” In the south of Egypt, the authors wrote, sub-Saharan influences may have been stronger.

This study left two gaps in the Egyptian timeline that Krause wants to fill, he said. It is not clear when the African gene flow, present in modern Egyptians, occurred. Nor could the study determine the origin of the Egyptians. “The other big question is, 'Where did the ancient Egyptians come from?' ” Krause said. To answer that, scientists will have to find genomes “back further in time, in prehistory.”

AD

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...as one persistent,Egypt is a gene incinerator.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom