Zone1 "White privilege" does not exist, it is a lie.

[horselightning]

“Not once in my life was I ever accused of being a bigot or racist or any of the other nonsense, nor did I ever want or think about desegregation. Prior to Obama's race baiting presidency, none of this was in my world, none of it... but this meme hits hard today, really hard.How our current state of societal rot isn't the #1 action item of every mayor in the Country ~ I've no clue.”

View attachment 967842

both side and both were bussed.

 

[horselightning]

What’s actually racist is believing black people are inferior and cannot live up the standards of white people.

Every eighth grader failed state math tests at LeBron James-backed 'I Promise School'

cbsaustin.com

they think that of us . and are desegregating themselves from us.

 

[IM2]

Are every single black person by nature inferior? No. Thomas sowell is a testament to that fact.

But, with that spoken there is a something to be said that of throughout the history of mankind across the entire world there are no first world entirely black countries. In mans history across the planet blacks have done very very very little in terms of science, engineering, electrical, physics, math, literature, psychology, aerospace, architecture, mechanical, medicine, and so on. Almost all of mans advances are due to people who aren't black. Modern civilization as we know it right now in every country is due to non blacks.

And most of the most successful black people are ones that come from white European based countries and societies. The white man hasn't kept blacks down for tens of thousands of years in every country including their own, they kept themselves down.

It isn't racist when you say something that's true.

What you said is racist because it isn't true.

Thomas Sowell is not first class, but because he says what you want to hear, you make that claim.

Your second paragraph is entirely fact free jibberish. You ignore the destruction of African countries by white colonization. You ignore that without the stolen resources from Africa, the white civilizations you talk about don't exist. Today, it is lithium mined out of African ground that allows us to use cell phones and computers. So you really need to go study and stop repeating white racist nonsense.

 

[MarathonMike]

What you said is racist because it isn't true.

Thomas Sowell is not first class, but because he says what you want to hear, you make that claim.

Your second paragraph is entirely fact free jibberish. You ignore the destruction of African countries by white colonization. You ignore that without the stolen resources from Africa, the white civilizations you talk about don't exist. Today, it is lithium mined out of African ground that allows us to use cell phones and computers. So you really need to go study and stop repeating white racist nonsense.

Nobody triggers you like Thomas Sowell. He is a great American and you are not.

 

[AZrailwhale]

What you said is racist because it isn't true.

Thomas Sowell is not first class, but because he says what you want to hear, you make that claim.

Your second paragraph is entirely fact free jibberish. You ignore the destruction of African countries by white colonization. You ignore that without the stolen resources from Africa, the white civilizations you talk about don't exist. Today, it is lithium mined out of African ground that allows us to use cell phones and computers. So you really need to go study and stop repeating white racist nonsense.

Keep living in your fantasies. Your African “kingdoms” barely had agriculture, the Europeans had more trouble fighting disease than your “ mighty” African kingdoms. Whites raised Africans up out of poverty, misery and ignorance. When the Whites left, the African countries lapsed back into poverty and misery despite having vast resources at their commands.

 

[el midgetron]

Wouldn't have been a market if the Europeans hadn't created it.

Dude, you are on a roll. Like every time you try to make a point, it’s based on low-grade leftist propaganda.

Your “evil white people” did not “create” a market for slavery. Just like blacks in the 1980’s aren’t to blame for creating a market for crack-cocain.

Slavery was universal. The only culture in the world working to abolish the UNIVERSAL practice of slavery, was the West.

Slavery existed independently, around the globe before cultural spread. Its the ultimate goal of bullies who are picking on the stupid kid.

 

[el midgetron]

Nobody triggers you like Thomas Sowell. He is a great American and you are not.

July is Thomas Sowell month.

 

[el midgetron]

 

[AZrailwhale]

Dude, you are on a roll. Like every time you try to make a point, it’s based on low-grade leftist propaganda.

Your “evil white people” did not “create” a market for slavery. Just like blacks in the 1980’s aren’t to blame for creating a market for crack-cocain.

Slavery was universal. The only culture in the world working to abolish the UNIVERSAL practice of slavery, was the West.

Slavery existed independently, around the globe before cultural spread. Its the ultimate goal of bullies who are picking on the stupid kid.

Even during the time of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, most slaves were marched north across the Sahara into Islamic slavery.

 

[JoeB131]

Dude, you are on a roll. Like every time you try to make a point, it’s based on low-grade leftist propaganda.

Your “evil white people” did not “create” a market for slavery. Just like blacks in the 1980’s aren’t to blame for creating a market for crack-cocain.

Slavery was universal. The only culture in the world working to abolish the UNIVERSAL practice of slavery, was the West.

Slavery existed independently, around the globe before cultural spread. Its the ultimate goal of bullies who are picking on the stupid kid.

Slavery pre-Columbus was never on the massive, industrial scale of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, your Islamophobic garbage not withstanding. .

 

[JoeB131]

Even during the time of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, most slaves were marched north across the Sahara into Islamic slavery.

Naw, they really weren't. The Trans-Atlantic Slave trade moved MILLIONS of people.

There are very few black folks in the Islamic world today. Which means they just didn't move that many.

(And don't give me that shit that they castrated the males, they clearly didn't castrate the females, whom they were were absolutely fucking.)

 

[el midgetron]

Slavery pre-Columbus was never on the massive, industrial scale of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, your Islamophobic garbage not withstanding. .

Well one thing is for sure, you have never done anything to further the abolishment of slavery. You even still vote for the people that fought a war to keep slavery. You are like the Japanese soldiers who were still fighting the war years after it ended.

Sorry Joe, it’s over. You aren’t getting your slaves back. It’s time for you to accept your personal responsibility for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. A vote for a Democrat, is a vote for the slavery market they created.

 

[JoeB131]

Well one thing is for sure, you have never done anything to further the abolishment of slavery. You even still vote for the people that fought a war to keep slavery. You are like the Japanese soldiers who were still fighting the war years after it ended.

Sorry Joe, it’s over. You aren’t getting your slaves back. It’s time for you to accept your personal responsibility for the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. A vote for a Democrat, is a vote for the slavery market they created.

Wow, you really do have all the Wingnut talking points down, don't you?

 

[MarathonMike]

Dude, you are on a roll. Like every time you try to make a point, it’s based on low-grade leftist propaganda.

Your “evil white people” did not “create” a market for slavery. Just like blacks in the 1980’s aren’t to blame for creating a market for crack-cocain.

Slavery was universal. The only culture in the world working to abolish the UNIVERSAL practice of slavery, was the West.

Slavery existed independently, around the globe before cultural spread. Its the ultimate goal of bullies who are picking on the stupid kid.

Democrat and their supporters like JoeB heavily rely on "re-interpreting" history to fit their agendas. When I was a kid the Democrats were an honorable American Party. But after LBJ took over, they jumped the Marxist Shark and they've been riding it to the bottom ever since.

 

[JoeB131]

Democrat and their supporters like JoeB heavily rely on "re-interpreting" history to fit their agendas. When I was a kid the Democrats were an honorable American Party. But after LBJ took over, they jumped the Marxist Shark and they've been riding it to the bottom ever since.

There's no interpretation.

LBJ drove out the Southern Racists of the Democratic Party, and Tricky Dick welcomed them with open arms.

You own them now.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Slavery pre-Columbus was never on the massive, industrial scale of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, your Islamophobic garbage not withstanding. .

Bullcrap. Roman, Greek and the other early civilizations were completely based upon slavery. On a scale unheard of in the new world. The Spartans feared their slaves so much that on one day a year, any slave could be killed for no reason at all by any freeperson to cull the slave population.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Naw, they really weren't. The Trans-Atlantic Slave trade moved MILLIONS of people.

There are very few black folks in the Islamic world today. Which means they just didn't move that many.

(And don't give me that shit that they castrated the males, they clearly didn't castrate the females, whom they were were absolutely fucking.)

Yes they did, they just castrated all the males so they couldn't reproduce. Stop making up "facts". That will be hard since that's all you do.

 

[JoeB131]

Bullcrap. Roman, Greek and the other early civilizations were completely based upon slavery. On a scale unheard of in the new world. The Spartans feared their slaves so much that on one day a year, any slave could be killed for no reason at all by any freeperson to cull the slave population.

Wow, so that makes what they did in the South Okay, then, that Barbarians acted like barbarians in the Iron Age? Really?

Yes they did, they just castrated all the males so they couldn't reproduce. Stop making up "facts". That will be hard since that's all you do.

So, um, did they castrate the women, too?

 

[AZrailwhale]

Wow, so that makes what they did in the South Okay, then, that Barbarians acted like barbarians in the Iron Age? Really?


So, um, did they castrate the women, too?

y in the Arab world​

JUN 16, 2019, 2:33 PM

• FACEBOOK
• TWITTER
• EMAIL
• PRINT
• 69

Please note that the posts on The Blogs are contributed by third parties. The opinions, facts and any media content in them are presented solely by the authors, and neither The Times of Israel nor its partners assume any responsibility for them. Please contact us in case of abuse. In case of abuse,
Report this post.


In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in the US about a demand by certain black organizations (like Black Lives Matter) for a financial compensation by the “white” people for slavery.
This demand raises many legitimate questions.
What if someone came to the US two or three generations ago and his ancestors did not own slaves?
What if the ancestor of a black man was a freeman who himself owned slaves (as we know that certain blacks did)?
In this case, does he has to pay reparations to himself?
Is holding accountable the descendants 150 years later the best way to go on?
I’m not saying to forget things like slavery, the lynch mobs and the Jim Crow laws (passed by Democrats) ever happened, I’m just asking do the American white people need to be punished for slavery Ad Infinitum?
If they had never acknowledged it that would be one thing, but they did a civil war that killed half a million people over it.
So yeah, they accepted the responsibility for what can justly be called a horrible crime.
What I find the most troubling in the current climate, is the definition of white.
Aren’t Latinos “white”?
What about all the black slaves brought in South America and the Caribbean by the Spaniards and Portuguese?
How come no one dares talk about “Latino” guilt and reparations?
My opinion on the why of it is: there is a deliberate targeting of white, Christian, western European people as the “white devil” while other sorts of Caucasians (like romans or semites) are dubbed “brown” (not a race) and the reason for it is to make easier what we call “identity politics” and have the “brown people” clearly marked as helpless victims of the evil white imperialism so the same brown people would vote for their defenders, aka the left.
In the ever-expanding list of oppressed people, there is a group that is anything but, the Muslims. And oh boy did they ever do a long list of things that everyone blames only the “whites” for: Invading other countries, cultural appropriation, genocides and of course, slavery.
I became interested on the subject while watching Tidiane N’Diaye, a French-Senegalese Anthropologist, talk on French TV about his latest book titled: The veiled genocide (French: Le génocide voilé, 2008).
Until then I had no idea that systematic black slavery in the Arab world ever existed, let alone lasted for more than 1400 years and did millions of dead.
How is it possible that such a monstrous event happened (and still happens in some parts of Africa) and yet unlike the trans-Atlantic slave trade which has been dissected under every angle possible, it was and largely still is, unknown by the public?
Two main routes were used for the Arab slave trade.
The first one was the Trans-Sahara route where sub-Saharan blacks where rounded up in razzias, a word that comes from an Algerian Arabic pronunciation of the classical Arabic word ghawz meaning a military expedition or a raid.
These razzias would capture able bodied young men who were to traverse the Sahara on foot (in harsh conditions) and once in North Africa they would be used as servants or warriors of various caliphs in a number of sultanates, mainly in Egypt and later on when the Ottoman Empire came into being, in Turkey.
Women were also captured to serve as sex slaves.
The second one was from the port on the island of Zanzibar just off the coast of what is today Tanzania.
The razzias in East Africa would center around the Blue Nile region (Sudan and Ethiopia), the Great Lakes (Mozambique, Kenya, Tanzania) and the Horn of Africa (Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti).
From the port of Zanzibar the black slaves would be shipped to the Arabic peninsula or to the Persian Gulf to serve as slaves or soldiers in Saudi Arabia, Oman, Iran or Iraq.
These ships would go as far as India to bring black slaves to the Muslim rulers in what is today the Punjab region of India and Pakistan.
Women were also captured to serve as sex slaves.
From 869 to 883 in the area of the city of Basra in the south of what is today modern Iraq, there was a Bantu-speaking black slave rebellion against their Arab slave masters led by Ali ibn Muhammad, himself a slave who had been kidnapped from his hometown in East Africa.
The event is known as the Zanj Rebellion and the slaves succeeded in killing tens of thousands of Arab Muslim oppressors before the rebellion was finally put down.
In most Muslim countries where there was a high number of black slaves (like Egypt, Turkey, Iran, India), there are virtually no significant black minorities today.
They make in no way even close to 10 or 15 percent of the population like they do in the US or Brazil. Where have they all gone?
There are many reasons for this lack of descendants and organized black communities in the Arab world.
The terrible conditions of travel, both by the Sahara route and the Indian Ocean one.
It is estimated that at least 50%, if not more, of the captured slaves died during travel.
Many others died in work and due to mistreatment.
Most of the male slaves were castrated (and died of the result of this barbaric operation) due to the fear that they would impregnate Muslim women.
Black women captured were used as sex slaves and their offspring form today the Arabized black elite ruling in Sudan, Mauritania and Somalia.
It is estimated by serious studies that close to 15 million blacks were taken as slaves in the Arabo-Muslim slave trade when as many as two thirds died or during travel or not long after arrival.
Most of the black Muslims today reside in Africa where they are either slaves who earned their freedom (especially those who were soldiers) blacks who were promised to be freed if they accepted Islam, or descendants of the mix between Arab masters and black sex slave females.
Black communities in Arab speaking countries outside of Africa are virtually inexistent due to the fact that most died in barbaric conditions.

Based upon that and intimations in other reports, the lack of blacks in Arabia is from them being held in barbarous conditions even as children. Simply put, most black slaves of Islamic masters were worked to death because replacements were so cheap. Why spend the effort and money raising a black baby when buying an adult who can work is cheaper? Unlike the American slave-holding states, the Islamic countries didn't allow slaves to have families and bear children. Some very favored high-ranking Janissaries were allowed that privilege, but most Janissaries weren't black.

 

[JoeB131]

In recent years, there has been a surge of interest in the US about a demand by certain black organizations (like Black Lives Matter) for a financial compensation by the “white” people for slavery.
This demand raises many legitimate questions.

Dude, nobody is interested in your Islamophobia.

This isn't about imaginary crimes committed in the Arab world, it's about what America has done and still owes it's black population.