Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually (if you bothered to read any of the reports), Clinton only received e-mails that contained classified information. Clinton never sent any e-mails with classified information, except from her government account, on the state department classified server.I thought that was what we had Hillary for. She was secretary of state--- didn't she pass an FBI test? She was emailing and phoning secrets all over left and right between her commercial cellphones and closet computer.
Clinton only received e-mails that contained classified information.
Those e-mails were not destroyed. She only deleted a COPY of the e-mails sent to her.So then Clinton destroyed classified info in those 33,000 emails she deleted to avoid scrutiny.
No, it isn't.Sorry, Americanized spelling of Qatar.
Do they need to be vetted in that fashion? The Founders didn't think so. All that is required is Senate confirmation.Hm...well, the appointees must be vetted. So if not the FBI, someone else needs to do it. But who?
No, it isn't.
Actually (if you bothered to read any of the reports), Clinton only received e-mails that contained classified information. Clinton never sent any e-mails with classified information, except from her government account, on the state department classified server.
Plus there was no evidence that anyone or any country gained access to the server. Hence no classified information fell into the wrong hands.
The founding fathers learned their mistake from Benedict Arnold.Do they need to vetted in that fashion? The Founders didn't think so. All that is required is Senate confirmation.
It's because every Q in English is followed by a U
spell it Quatar because that's linguistically correct.
Haha, the cult LOVES lining up the excuses for the losers they support.And no one should be surprised at this possibility. The FBI is broken, was broken by Obama, weaponized by Obama. It needs to go.
An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.The allegations of political bias at the FBI’s Security Division or SecD were revealed in a protected whistleblower disclosure sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which The Washington Times reviewed.The official said the security clearance process has been “contaminated by the political agendas of [Security Division] officials and other executives in the FBI.”The process is also subordinate to the same FBI executives who Mr. Trump has promised to sweep out of the agency, according to the whistleblower.“FBI SecD has been politicized, and both Director [Christopher] Wray and Deputy Director [Paul] Abbate have the ability to examine the background investigations of anyone who is having a security clearance done,” said the disclosure, which was submitted on Saturday.The FBI whistleblower said lawmakers need to know that the background investigations are conducted by SecD, the same office that has been accused of weaponizing the process and using it to retaliate against FBI employees because of their political views, including conservative and pro-Trump views....
Whistleblower warns FBI can’t be trusted with background checks for Trump’s nominees
An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.www.washingtontimes.com
Hardly, those are really not comparable situations.The founding fathers learned their mistake from Benedict Arnold.
Two right wing speculative articles. Before the FBI actually investigated, and concluded the opposite.
Maybe you don't remember, but Trump was the one who put those people in place
Benedict Arnold provided the British with crucial details about the defenses of West Point, including troop strength, planned movements, and artillery placements, effectively offering to surrender the strategically important fort to them in exchange for a large sum of money; he also shared information about potential American troop movements and invasion plans, including a proposed attack on Canada.Hardly, those are really not comparable situations.
Wray (aka the guy Trump put in charge) could have replaced them.Nope, only Wray, who was highly recommended to Trump by Chris Christie.
The others are in there a long time, many since the Divider-In-Chief Obama's time.
See above, just as I have stated before, they don't just believe the lies, they fucking worship them!You mean like Rudy Giuliani? Who lied to the courts. /
Or Michael Flynn who lied about his foreign contacts.
You might as well e-mail our top secrets directly to russia and china if you gave them clearance.
Christopher Wray (Trumps pick) "was" the top tier. He approved all the hiring as Trumps top man in charge.The entire top tier of FBI will be exterminated, however FBI is a culture, and that top tier very deliberately influenced the hiring process to greatly favor the hiring of woke, leftist deviants! I believe FBI just needs to be exterminated entirely right out of existence, we have absolutely no need for a fascist democrat operated secret police, from the lowliest janitor to Wray's office, get rid of them all and build a new, American controlled agency, and totally freeze out any and all fascist democrat influence upon it!
And here in a thread about the FBI's built-in bias, you believe the FBI fairly exonerated Hillary.Two right wing speculative articles. Before the FBI actually investigated, and concluded the opposite.
But you're okay with General Milley providing the same information to China if Trump ordered an attack.Benedict Arnold provided the British with crucial details about the defenses of West Point, including troop strength, planned movements, and artillery placements, effectively offering to surrender the strategically important fort to them in exchange for a large sum of money; he also shared information about potential American troop movements and invasion plans, including a proposed attack on Canada.
All of which would have been "classified" information.
And no one should be surprised at this possibility. The FBI is broken, was broken by Obama, weaponized by Obama. It needs to go.
An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.
The allegations of political bias at the FBI’s Security Division or SecD were revealed in a protected whistleblower disclosure sent to the House Judiciary Committee, which The Washington Times reviewed.
The official said the security clearance process has been “contaminated by the political agendas of [Security Division] officials and other executives in the FBI.”
The process is also subordinate to the same FBI executives who Mr. Trump has promised to sweep out of the agency, according to the whistleblower.
“FBI SecD has been politicized, and both Director [Christopher] Wray and Deputy Director [Paul] Abbate have the ability to examine the background investigations of anyone who is having a security clearance done,” said the disclosure, which was submitted on Saturday.
The FBI whistleblower said lawmakers need to know that the background investigations are conducted by SecD, the same office that has been accused of weaponizing the process and using it to retaliate against FBI employees because of their political views, including conservative and pro-Trump views.
...
Whistleblower warns FBI can’t be trusted with background checks for Trump’s nominees
An official at FBI headquarters in Washington is warning that the bureau’s security clearance division is politicized and can’t be trusted to screen President-elect Donald Trump’s nominees for top administration jobs.
