Whistleblower protections no longer exist

Marener

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2022
Messages
60,469
Reaction score
25,346
Points
2,173

A whistleblower was fired from the NIH citing constitutional authority to do so.

This raises the question. Under the Trump administration, the policy is that Congress can’t prevent them from firing anyone for any reason. SCOTUS has allowed this to happen, with one notable exception.

So it raises the question, do whistleblower protections exist? Are they constitutional?
 
how about the times the 'whistleblower' is a figment of someone's imagination?

1759618459694.webp
 

A whistleblower was fired from the NIH citing constitutional authority to do so.

This raises the question. Under the Trump administration, the policy is that Congress can’t prevent them from firing anyone for any reason. SCOTUS has allowed this to happen, with one notable exception.

So it raises the question, do whistleblower protections exist? Are they constitutional?

What did Obama do to whistleblowers?
 

A whistleblower was fired from the NIH citing constitutional authority to do so.

This raises the question. Under the Trump administration, the policy is that Congress can’t prevent them from firing anyone for any reason. SCOTUS has allowed this to happen, with one notable exception.

So it raises the question, do whistleblower protections exist? Are they constitutional?
Or perhaps she was fired because she was a whiny know-it-all asshole? Just spitballing here.
 
Or perhaps she was fired because she was a whiny know-it-all asshole? Just spitballing here.
Does it matter? There’s no legal whistleblower protection according to this administration.
 
Does it matter? There’s no legal whistleblower protection according to this administration.
Sure there is. She filed her complaint and she can make her case. Sound like a policy difference.
 
Sure there is. She filed her complaint and she can make her case. Sound like a policy difference.
What authority does congress have to tell the president who he can and can’t fire in their administration?

Trump says they have none.
 
What authority does congress have to tell the president who he can and can’t fire in their administration?

Trump says they have none.
It's a good question. The OSC is part of the Executive branch and the President is the Chief Executive.
 
It's a good question. The OSC is part of the Executive branch and the President is the Chief Executive.
I didn’t know anyone was for ending whistleblower protections until now.

This is what Trump has done to us.
 
Questioning the actions of co-workers does not constitute "whistleblower" no matter what CBS says. Were all the members of the Military who were fired for refusing to take Fauci's questionable jab considered to be "whistleblowers?
President can fire anyone, anytime, for any reason.

Right?
 

A whistleblower was fired from the NIH citing constitutional authority to do so.

This raises the question. Under the Trump administration, the policy is that Congress can’t prevent them from firing anyone for any reason. SCOTUS has allowed this to happen, with one notable exception.

So it raises the question, do whistleblower protections exist? Are they constitutional?
There is no place for whistleblowers in the police state MAGA is trying to build
 
Questioning the actions of co-workers does not constitute "whistleblower" no matter what CBS says. Were all the members of the Military who were fired for refusing to take Fauci's questionable jab considered to be "whistleblowers?
They were victims of Biden/Democrat/Musolini style fascism any way you look at it.
.
 

A whistleblower was fired from the NIH citing constitutional authority to do so.

This raises the question. Under the Trump administration, the policy is that Congress can’t prevent them from firing anyone for any reason. SCOTUS has allowed this to happen, with one notable exception.

So it raises the question, do whistleblower protections exist? Are they constitutional?

So help me understand:

She was put on indefinite leave in March and filed a whistleblower complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel in September,

So she was put on indefinite leave in March and didnt file a whistle blower complaint until September.

Why was she put on leave in march, if her complaints didnt come until september?
 
15th post
So help me understand:



So she was put on indefinite leave in March and didnt file a whistle blower complaint until September.

Why was she put on leave in march, if her complaints didnt come until september?
Doesn’t matter. Whistleblower protections don’t exist anymore anyway.
 
were they known to be whistle blowers when they were fired?

or was it a coincidence?
It honestly doesn’t matter.

The Trump administration doesn’t care if they’re actually a whistleblower or not.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom