While Canadians are paying attention to Trump this, and Trump that ...

[that's not a macchiato]

... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.

The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?

Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?

Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?

Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?

And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?

 

[shockedcanadian]

... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.

The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?

Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?

Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?

Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?

And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?

Don't worry about us man, just save those of us who have been persecuted.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Don't worry about us man, just save those of us who have been persecuted.

No one cares.

 

[JimH52]

trump wants to be their King.

 

[0311]

... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.

The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?

Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?

Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over =Canada?

Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?

And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?

NO LINK + NO PROOF = LIES!

 

[Michael1985]

Canada is a member of the British Commonwealth, and as such, the King is the legal head of state, but he only reads the Speech from the Throne in countries other than the UK if the head of government there specifically invites him to do so, as happened in this instance. Removing him from that office would require amending the constitution with all ten provinces assenting to the change. Good luck getting all of them with different political parties in government, different ideologies, and different ideas about constitutional reform to agree on that or any other set of proposals.

 

[luiza]

... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.

The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?

Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?

Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?

Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?

And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?

It's all Theatre .
The three of them are old Deep State pals -- Charlie , Mark and Trumpfy .

A bit of Deflection here and a bit more over there and the poor Sheeple will remain baffled about what is really planned for them .

 

[that's not a macchiato]

Canada is a member of the British Commonwealth, and as such, the King is the legal head of state, but he only reads the Speech from the Throne in countries other than the UK if the head of government there specifically invites him to do so, as happened in this instance. Removing him from that office would require amending the constitution with all ten provinces assenting to the change. Good luck getting all of them with different political parties in government, different ideologies, and different ideas about constitutional reform to agree on that or any other set of proposals.

The Canadian Crown is 100% in Canadian legal jurisdiction. No constitutional amendment required.

 

[Michael1985]

The Canadian Crown is 100% in Canadian legal jurisdiction. No constitutional amendment required.

This is truly one of the most stupid and ignorant statements I've ever seen. Do your homework and educate yourself.

 

[that's not a macchiato]

This is truly one of the most stupid and ignorant statements I've ever seen. Do your homework and educate yourself.

Are you suggesting the Canadian Crown is NOT 100% in Canadian jurisdiction?

 

[luiza]

... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.

The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?

Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?

Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?

Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?

And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?

All Theatre and Deflection .

If you don't think that Charles is part of the cast , I remind you that the historical core of the Deep State has always rested with the power and wealth of the Elite , and that totally includes old style nobility and aristocracy .
Charles and Wlliam carry on that tradition but Harry is a likely exception given his bastard status .

 

[hondo 50]

King Pedo Charles