that's not a macchiato
Rookie
- Jan 16, 2025
- 30
- 46
- 1
... King Charles quietly claims the full power of the Canadian Crown.
The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?
Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?
Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?
Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?
And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?
The throne speech is necessary. Without it, what legal claim does he have?
Is not the act of succession an act of the British Parliament?
Did not the Canada Bill 1982 nullify jurisdiction of the British Parliament and any of its acts over Canada?
Therefore, could not Canadians have chosen whoever they wanted to be King?
And if that chosen one had made the throne speech, would not Charles be powerless to legally do anything about it?