Which was/is America's anti-country/anti-countries in the past 125 years

[pal]

The USA stands alone regardless of allies in other parts of the world.

The USA think about war/wars.

The discussion begun.

 

[Stryder50]

The USA stands alone regardless of allies in other parts of the world.

The USA think about war/wars.

The discussion begun.

Not off to a good start here lad.
First, explain what you mean by anti-country/anti-countries.
As stated/presented, the concept seems vague. (Maybe something lost in translation ?)

In that 125 year timeline you present the USA has been dragged into TWO WORLD WARS started by you Euros.
Not only have we/U$A paid out a lot of trea$ure to fight and end those wars, we've also been left with the tab for the major share of rebuild co$t$. With very limited "thank you"s from those whose arse we saved when pulling their fat out of the fire.

So yeah, you Euros have sort of forced USA to think about war/wars, especially the ones you started, and also now the others than might start, either directly by some on the list above, or as we've seen the past 75+ years, from mismanagement and disruptions you Euros caused with your colonies around the world of the past few centuries.

If you Euros could break your 4-5 centuries old habit of mangling other peoples lands and starting wars every couple of decades, which tend to trickle down upon USA, we might not need to "think about war/wars".

USA would really appreciate if you Euros would grow up, mature, and stop leaving your messes around the world which more often than not we USA have to clean up.

At this point, the discussion is QED.

Oh yeah ...
About this "USA stands alone regardless of allies in other parts of the world." We've noticed that. Especially since we most often are left paying the check after those "allies" dined and dashed.

 

[Stryder50]

Here's something to sink your teeth into and chew on. If anything these past 20+ years, the sentiment has grown.

The End of America’s European Romance​

By Ralph Peters
May 15, 2003

The societies of “Old Europe” remind Americans of the Arab Street. Preferring comforting delusions to challenging realities, Europeans talk a great deal, do very little, and blame the United States for home-grown ills. The recent chants in the boulevards of Berlin were almost indistinguishable from those heard–until recently–in downtown Baghdad. Europe’s culture of complaint, its enthusiasm for accusing America of every wickedness while assigning every virtue to itself, and its stunning lack of self-examination leave Americans bewildered.

We thought you were adults, but, from across the Atlantic, you look like spoiled children. And your recent tantrums have convinced Big Daddy America to deposit you on the steps of the strategic orphanage. The damage done by the recent confrontation between The United States and those nations whose vocabularies collapsed to the single words “Nein!” or “Non!” will be repaired–on the surface. We shall continue to cooperate on matters of mutual interest. But, on a deeper level, the exuberantly dishonest attacks on America heard from France and Germany (Belgium simply doesn’t count), along with the shameless grandstanding of Mr. Schroeder and Mr. Chirac, appear to even the most pragmatic Americans as grounds for divorce from our long marriage of convenience.

The divorce is long overdue. Ignoring “Old Europe” on questions of grand strategy will liberate the United States, freeing us at last from the failed European model of diplomacy that has given the world so many hideous wars, dysfunctional borders and undisturbed dictators. The recent mischief wrought in Paris and Berlin has enabled Washington to escape a long thrall of enchantment, a slumber of sorts during which America allowed Europe’s ghost to haunt its decisions.

Now you have awakened us, and we see that Europe’s influence was nothing but a legacy of nightmares. We shall no longer subscribe to your bloodsoaked, corrupt rules for the international system, but will forge our own. You will not like many of our new rules. But to paraphrase Frederick the Great’s remark about Maria Theresia, you will cry, but take your share of any available spoils. As a result of a series of remarkable strategic miscalculations, France and Germany have lost their international footing–not only with the USA, but with the world. You had your moment in the anti-American sun. High noon revealed you as powerless and inept.
....

The End of America's European Romance

The societies of “Old Europe” remind Americans of the Arab Street. Preferring comforting delusions to challenging realities, Europeans talk a great deal, do very little, and blame the United States for home-grown ills. The recent chants in the boulevards of Berlin were almost indistinguishable...

www.aei.org

 

[pal]

Not off to a good start here lad.
First, explain what you mean by anti-country/anti-countries.
As stated/presented, the concept seems vague. (Maybe something lost in translation ?)

In that 125 year timeline you present the USA has been dragged into TWO WORLD WARS started by you Euros.

Oh yeah ...
About this "USA stands alone regardless of allies in other parts of the world." We've noticed that. Especially since we most often are left paying the check after those "allies" dined and dashed.

The USA has few anti-countries stances since the world wars and cold war and beyond first Nazi Germany, second Soviet Union, third Cuba, then Iraq, then terrorists, then China countries like the USA have faced or can face.

 

[Stryder50]

The USA has few anti-countries stances since the world wars and cold war and beyond first Nazi Germany, second Soviet Union, third Cuba, then Iraq, then terrorists, then China countries like the USA have faced or can face.

Okay ... as I understand your English, I'd suggest that the current order of nations you list that are military threat concern would be;

1> PRChina
2> Russia (no longer Soviet Union)
3> Iran rather than Iraq(which is no great threat at present, or in future)
4> North Korea
5> "terrorists", a.k.a. Islamic Jihad

Cuba is no great threat.

Nazi Germany was fought (World War Two) along with Japan and Italy (and a few lesser Axis allies), but all three have since become no threat and are friends/allies of sorts.

 

[pal]

Cuba is no great threat.

Cuba has socialism government USA can threat former communism government.
1959 Cuba transformed Cuba to communism regime.

 

[pal]

Terrorists are big enemies to UK, France, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Russia know well.

**** terrorism!

 

[Stryder50]

Cuba has socialism government USA can threat former communism government.
1959 Cuba transformed Cuba to communism regime.

WTF you trying to say, gumba ???
Cuba can barely manage to feed itself, let alone be a threat beyond it's shores/borders.
Without any form of outside support, Cuba can barely (if that) support/feed itself !!!
Socialist/communist system just makes it even more unsustainable. ( As shown/manifest in many places on this planet.)

 

[stan ford 4]

I don't really get the question.

 

[pal]

I don't really get the question.

Which countries or which country America's main enemies or enemy. You hang out?

 

[Stryder50]

Cuba has socialism government USA can threat former communism government.
1959 Cuba transformed Cuba to communism regime.

Cuba has no significant economy, industry, or military.
Hence to real threat of itself to the USA.
It depends(survives) upon "the kindness of others".
It is a very close located base for America's enemies to operate from.

 

[pal]

Iraqi forces.

 

[Zavulon]

I'd rather said, that the doppelgänger, evil twin, worse version of themselves, for Americans is British Empire. Russia or China might be "significant others", but hardly more. They are too different to become "anti-America".

 

[pal]

I'd rather said, that the doppelgänger, evil twin, worse version of themselves, for Americans is British Empire. Russia or China might be "significant others", but hardly more. They are too different to become "anti-America".

Americans are really British. Same language group to say.

 

[Zavulon]

Americans are really British. Same language group to say.

It's not about what language do you speak. It is more about moral, political and cultural issues.

 

[pal]

It's not about what language do you speak. It is more about moral, political and cultural issues.

Swedes tell Swedish in Sweden. Swedish are native in Sweden. English are native in England. It's also tell the language.

 

[pal]

Americans say like in Britain.
Americans are like the British.
The USA is a big English-speaking nation.

 

[Zavulon]

Swedes tell Swedish in Sweden. Swedish are native in Sweden. English are native in England. It's also tell the language.

Both Swedens and English (if we are talking about languages and cultures) are not native for the territories of the modern Sweden and England. They are descendants of German-speaking invaders, who partly assimilated, partly genocided local populations. And no, official svenska is just one of Sweden languages. There are a lot of local "dialects" sockenmål, and some of sweden dialects are used in other countries (like it is official language in Finland, too).
Language is a significant and important part of identity, but not the only one. Say, most of Irishmen speaks English, but try to tell them, that they are Englishmen...

 

[pal]

Both Swedens and English (if we are talking about languages and cultures) are not native for the territories of the modern Sweden and England. They are descendants of German-speaking invaders, who partly assimilated, partly genocided local populations. And no, official svenska is just one of Sweden languages. There are a lot of local "dialects" sockenmål, and some of sweden dialects are used in other countries (like it is official language in Finland, too).
Language is a significant and important part of identity, but not the only one. Say, most of Irishmen speaks English, but try to tell them, that they are Englishmen...

English is closely kin to Swedish and then Swedish is closely kin to German and then Italian is closely kin to Latin.