When was it, again, that the United States stopped being "Great"?

schmidlap

Platinum Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2020
Messages
14,230
Reaction score
9,114
Points
1,138
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.


Screen Shot 2021-05-10 at 5.12.43 PM.webp

Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Screen Shot 2024-10-07 at 7.43.37 AM.webp

Screen Shot 2025-01-22 at 3.46.24 PM.webp
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?
 
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.



Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and


power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?


wtf is a "profile"?


When white working class guy applies for a job and doesn't get it, becuase they give it to a black guy because "DIVERSITY" it doesn't matter that the guy sitting in the oval office has a similar skin tone.


YOu are a leftard defender of anti-white discrimination and oppression.
 
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.



Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?
America is a grand country but any decline occurs whenever you become too close and enact policies and positions that foreign nations hold simply because they are deemed "an ally".

For example, pre WWII America was more dominant relatively speaking than post-WWII. Pre Berlin Wall you were more dominant than post-Berlin wall.

The term globalism in theory, should be ideal for all as long as the field is fair and America maintains its Republic. When you embrace other nations ideology in an attempt to "become closer allies" rather than these nations becoming more like America, then you hurt your nations greatness and future prospects.

Your Founding Fathers were a thousand years ahead of the rest of the world in their brilliance, other nations fell far behind economically and socially. You should not jeopardize their beautiful vision which lead to your Constitution just to appease a handful or wealthy or powerful fools. Most who ironically achieved their success due to the very system your Founders created.
 
when the narcissistic president things he can rule by issuing orders that he cannot issue.

what has he got to lose. Nothing but his dignity which he never had.

that what makes America great.
 
when the narcissistic president things he can rule by issuing orders that he cannot issue.

what has he got to lose. Nothing but his dignity which he never had.

that what makes America great.
when the narcissistic president things he can rule by issuing orders that he cannot issue.
you're talking about student loans, right?
 
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.



Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?
Nobody cares about your stage 4 TDS and hatred of Trump supporters and White males. You are a loser Democrat supporter who roots for the decline of America.
 
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.



Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?

Hitler was popular once also.

Hitlertrumpcrowd.webp
 
15th post
A conspicuous distinction between advanced democracies and authoritarian regimes is the citizen’s right to criticize their political leaders without fear of being targeted for petty vendettas or worse. Rather, in democratic nations, those political leaders are subject to the law, although they may throw their tantrums at being convicted by juries of their peers when they cannot evade trial, as they vilify any judicial system that does not kowtow to their whims. They also contrive methods to intimidate and subjugate the legislative branch.

Authoritarian regimes are often characterized by submissive personality cults who venerate a “Dear Leader’ who exploits their sense of grievance by demonizing the “other,” and conjuring up a paradise lost, a mythical golden age when their ilk was supreme, a time to which their El Supremo promises retrogression.



Bullying is the customary means of wielding power, blatant lies in copious abundance, and, of course, the targeting of academia, science, and medicine wherever empirical data contradicts their self-serving ideological dogma. Some may champion a sham meritocracy, one in which pretexts to severely restrict the talent pool are concocted and intellectual potential suppressed.
Was the United States “Great” when one gender and one race enjoyed dominion over all others? Before efforts to redress the inherent, enduring, inflicted inequalities were undertaken?

The usual suspects need to cling to the illusion of superiority that years and years of their de facto and de iure discrimination conferred upon them.

The racial and gender profile that wields dominion in wealth and power in America bleats that it is being persecuted.

Shouldn't White males find that embarrassing?


When we let 11 million pedophiles, rapists, and murderers into our Country illegally.
 
Back
Top Bottom