When Lefties pitch Socialism do they realize what decent people hear?

[ph3iron]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

Total garbage.
A knees news def regurgitated by our frightened old white farts
All our so righteous old white fart complainers are sucking off socialist benefits
Medicare
SS
vA
2 weeks vacation
Kids under 12 not working in mines?
It's hilarious

 

[BrokeLoser]

Will somebody please tell this dumb **** how taxation for social programs works.

The Left has to pretend they don’t understand elementary shit...that’s the only way they can continue their fight to share your bank account.

It’s really tiring to try and argue with people who act like they’re morons. Maybe they really are?

If I take money from you and give it to somebody else, that’s called stealing. But when government does it…

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

 

[Nosmo King]

The Left has to pretend they don’t understand elementary shit...that’s the only way they can continue their fight to share your bank account.

It’s really tiring to try and argue with people who act like they’re morons. Maybe they really are?

If I take money from you and give it to somebody else, that’s called stealing. But when government does it…

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

At one point even high school was seen as a luxury. Then we developed factories and merchantile establishments and suddenly, high school was seen as a necessity.

What happens when information technology becomes the driving force in our economy? Do you think having an education system built to service and industrial economy will still be adequate?

You want to make us all afraid of immigrants. Let's set that aside. Why would it be a better society if some folks cannot visit a doctor for preventative care? What makes it a better society if some folks cannot afford medical insurance? Why should some folks who work hard every day be denied access to good health?

 

[bripat9643]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

Marx is decent people.


Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on distribution. After the real relation has long been made clear, why retrogress again?
Critique of the Gotha Programme-- I

I never heard your mouth referred to as "the means of consumption." Not only is the above convoluted and meaningless, it's also bullshit. I'd bet good money you couldn't translate that pile of crap into plain English.

 

[Timmy]

Here’s what righty rubes hear:

“Duhhhhhh , “socialism” sounds like “communism “. My great grampa says communism is bad!!! Duhhhhhhh”

 

[Timmy]

The Left has to pretend they don’t understand elementary shit...that’s the only way they can continue their fight to share your bank account.

It’s really tiring to try and argue with people who act like they’re morons. Maybe they really are?

If I take money from you and give it to somebody else, that’s called stealing. But when government does it…

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

You are so short sighted .

You don’t benefit from a healthy child being born ? You’d rather that kid be born with a permanent disability and be an expensive ward if of the state for 70 years ??

 

[Tehon]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

Marx is decent people.


Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on distribution. After the real relation has long been made clear, why retrogress again?
Critique of the Gotha Programme-- I

I never heard your mouth referred to as "the means of consumption." Not only is the above convoluted and meaningless, it's also bullshit. I'd bet good money you couldn't translate that pile of crap into plain English.

He is saying that using the government to redistribute wealth is not socialism.

He is saying that the socialist way to redistribute wealth is to alter the social relations of production.

You think he is talking about eating?

 

[BrokeLoser]

It’s really tiring to try and argue with people who act like they’re morons. Maybe they really are?

If I take money from you and give it to somebody else, that’s called stealing. But when government does it…

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

At one point even high school was seen as a luxury. Then we developed factories and merchantile establishments and suddenly, high school was seen as a necessity.

What happens when information technology becomes the driving force in our economy? Do you think having an education system built to service and industrial economy will still be adequate?

You want to make us all afraid of immigrants. Let's set that aside. Why would it be a better society if some folks cannot visit a doctor for preventative care? What makes it a better society if some folks cannot afford medical insurance? Why should some folks who work hard every day be denied access to good health?

“You want to make us all afraid of immigrants.”
Well, If you want more free shit for yourself shouldn’t you be “afraid” of ILLEGAL immigrants sharing in said free shit....or do you honestly believe the free shit is infinite?

 

[JWBooth]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

If they gave a shit about decent people they wouldn’t push socialist notions.

 

[bripat9643]

It’s really tiring to try and argue with people who act like they’re morons. Maybe they really are?

If I take money from you and give it to somebody else, that’s called stealing. But when government does it…

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

You are so short sighted .

You don’t benefit from a healthy child being born ? You’d rather that kid be born with a permanent disability and be an expensive ward if of the state for 70 years ??

We don't benefit from anchor babies especially when the grow up and vote for commies like Pelosi.

 

[bripat9643]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

Marx is decent people.


Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on distribution. After the real relation has long been made clear, why retrogress again?
Critique of the Gotha Programme-- I

I never heard your mouth referred to as "the means of consumption." Not only is the above convoluted and meaningless, it's also bullshit. I'd bet good money you couldn't translate that pile of crap into plain English.

He is saying that using the government to redistribute wealth is not socialism.

He is saying that the socialist way to redistribute wealth is to alter the social relations of production.

You think he is talking about eating?

What else could "the means of consumption" mean?

 

[Tehon]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

Marx is decent people.


Quite apart from the analysis so far given, it was in general a mistake to make a fuss about so-called distribution and put the principal stress on it.

Any distribution whatever of the means of consumption is only a consequence of the distribution of the conditions of production themselves. The latter distribution, however, is a feature of the mode of production itself. The capitalist mode of production, for example, rests on the fact that the material conditions of production are in the hands of nonworkers in the form of property in capital and land, while the masses are only owners of the personal condition of production, of labor power. If the elements of production are so distributed, then the present-day distribution of the means of consumption results automatically. If the material conditions of production are the co-operative property of the workers themselves, then there likewise results a distribution of the means of consumption different from the present one. Vulgar socialism (and from it in turn a section of the democrats) has taken over from the bourgeois economists the consideration and treatment of distribution as independent of the mode of production and hence the presentation of socialism as turning principally on distribution. After the real relation has long been made clear, why retrogress again?
Critique of the Gotha Programme-- I

I never heard your mouth referred to as "the means of consumption." Not only is the above convoluted and meaningless, it's also bullshit. I'd bet good money you couldn't translate that pile of crap into plain English.

He is saying that using the government to redistribute wealth is not socialism.

He is saying that the socialist way to redistribute wealth is to alter the social relations of production.

You think he is talking about eating?

What else could "the means of consumption" mean?

The distribution of the means of consumption is another way of saying the distribution of wealth. Wealth being the ability to appropriate the things in life which sustain us, the things which we consume, as in use up.

 

[Timmy]

No matter how it’s cleverly spun or packaged ALL decent people hear it the same way.
“Provide me with shit that other people pay for...I’m entitled to free shit because I stand on U.S. soil.”
Do they realize NOBODY good and decent is shameless enough to make these types of requests?
I’m hoping the pitchmasters such as Mac1958 will weigh in here.

If they gave a shit about decent people they wouldn’t push socialist notions.

Yeah . Don’t you just hate the VA? Lazy ass ex military folks need to get their own insurance like the rest of us!

 

[Timmy]

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

You are so short sighted .

You don’t benefit from a healthy child being born ? You’d rather that kid be born with a permanent disability and be an expensive ward if of the state for 70 years ??

We don't benefit from anchor babies especially when the grow up and vote for commies like Pelosi.

You mean fellow Americans like the rest of us? Or are you Cherokee or somthing?

 

[Mr Natural]

You mean fellow Americans like the rest of us? Or are you Cherokee or somthing?

Nope, just ******* stupid.

 

[BrokeLoser]

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

You are so short sighted .

You don’t benefit from a healthy child being born ? You’d rather that kid be born with a permanent disability and be an expensive ward if of the state for 70 years ??

We don't benefit from anchor babies especially when the grow up and vote for commies like Pelosi.

You mean fellow Americans like the rest of us? Or are you Cherokee or somthing?

You mean fellow Americans like the rest of us? Or are you Cherokee or somthing?

Nope, just ******* stupid.

NEGATIVE ******* lovers...born here by illegal means is legal by retard technicality and that makes an anchor baby a barely legal.

 

[Nosmo King]

W

Is the government stealing my money when they give it to schools? I have no children. My money is being given to others! Is that fair?

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

At one point even high school was seen as a luxury. Then we developed factories and merchantile establishments and suddenly, high school was seen as a necessity.

What happens when information technology becomes the driving force in our economy? Do you think having an education system built to service and industrial economy will still be adequate?

You want to make us all afraid of immigrants. Let's set that aside. Why would it be a better society if some folks cannot visit a doctor for preventative care? What makes it a better society if some folks cannot afford medical insurance? Why should some folks who work hard every day be denied access to good health?

“You want to make us all afraid of immigrants.”
Well, If you want more free shit for yourself shouldn’t you be “afraid” of ILLEGAL immigrants sharing in said free shit....or do you honestly believe the free shit is infinite?

ould you deny the benefits to American citizens because undocumented immigrants might, MIGHT just get the benefits too?

It's like saying I can't have a steak because a toddler might accidentally take a bite.

Are immigrants the Master Boogeyman in all things? Are they responsible for all the nation's problems? For your problems? Are they truly responsible, or the most convenient whipping boy at hand? They aren't white. They speak a different language. They're easy to kick around. And boors, bullies and the uninformed love something to kick.

 

[BrokeLoser]

W

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

At one point even high school was seen as a luxury. Then we developed factories and merchantile establishments and suddenly, high school was seen as a necessity.

What happens when information technology becomes the driving force in our economy? Do you think having an education system built to service and industrial economy will still be adequate?

You want to make us all afraid of immigrants. Let's set that aside. Why would it be a better society if some folks cannot visit a doctor for preventative care? What makes it a better society if some folks cannot afford medical insurance? Why should some folks who work hard every day be denied access to good health?

“You want to make us all afraid of immigrants.”
Well, If you want more free shit for yourself shouldn’t you be “afraid” of ILLEGAL immigrants sharing in said free shit....or do you honestly believe the free shit is infinite?

ould you deny the benefits to American citizens because undocumented immigrants might, MIGHT just get the benefits too?

It's like saying I can't have a steak because a toddler might accidentally take a bite.

Are immigrants the Master Boogeyman in all things? Are they responsible for all the nation's problems? For your problems? Are they truly responsible, or the most convenient whipping boy at hand? They aren't white. They speak a different language. They're easy to kick around. And boors, bullies and the uninformed love something to kick.

Poor Loons....You just can’t wrap your simple little minds around even the most elementary of things....Look, the same bottom feeding lowlifes begging for more free shit are also begging for more free shit for all their ******* friends....**** the filthy *****, it doesn’t work like that. Beg for your own shit and help keep the thirdworlder cockroaches from stealing your free shit....this really isn’t all that complex or trivial...is it?

 

[Nosmo King]

W

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

At one point even high school was seen as a luxury. Then we developed factories and merchantile establishments and suddenly, high school was seen as a necessity.

What happens when information technology becomes the driving force in our economy? Do you think having an education system built to service and industrial economy will still be adequate?

You want to make us all afraid of immigrants. Let's set that aside. Why would it be a better society if some folks cannot visit a doctor for preventative care? What makes it a better society if some folks cannot afford medical insurance? Why should some folks who work hard every day be denied access to good health?

“You want to make us all afraid of immigrants.”
Well, If you want more free shit for yourself shouldn’t you be “afraid” of ILLEGAL immigrants sharing in said free shit....or do you honestly believe the free shit is infinite?

ould you deny the benefits to American citizens because undocumented immigrants might, MIGHT just get the benefits too?

It's like saying I can't have a steak because a toddler might accidentally take a bite.

Are immigrants the Master Boogeyman in all things? Are they responsible for all the nation's problems? For your problems? Are they truly responsible, or the most convenient whipping boy at hand? They aren't white. They speak a different language. They're easy to kick around. And boors, bullies and the uninformed love something to kick.

Poor Loons....You just can’t wrap your simple little minds around even the most elementary of things....Look, the same bottom feeding lowlifes begging for more free shit are also begging for more free shit for all their ******* friends....**** the filthy *****, it doesn’t work like that. Beg for your own shit and help keep the thirdworlder cockroaches from stealing your free shit....this really isn’t all that complex or trivial...is it?

And here I thought you wanted an honest discussion. All you really want to do is kick a Latino and crack open another Pabst.

 

[bripat9643]

You wackos continue to struggle to make simple distinctions.
Look, society, collectively decided that an educated society benefits ALL...just as infrastructure, and defense benefits all...think basic reciprocation.
NOBODY good and sane thinks we all benefit by incentivizing / paying Guadalupe and Gustavo to flee their shithole, run their baby factories here, smoke weed and drink 40’s all day while we all go to work.
Think once Loons.

You imagine that scenario. If education benefits all, what is the objection to tuition free community colleges or trade schools?

If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?

When all you see I see what you want to see, or have been told to see by pundits with agendas, all you can argue is the absurd, the canard, the hyperbolic. And what is good and sane about that?

Society has collectively decided that a FREE K-12 education is what they’re willing to pay for....everybody has to be weaned from mama’s tit at some point...Should we pay for masters degrees and PHD’s as well? Think once bud.

“If infrastructure benefits all, what is the objection to healthcare for all? Isn't Health as vital as a highway or bridge?”
NOPE....I use that bridge or highway, I don’t benefit from healthy litters of anchor babies at all.

Back to the drawing board you go....keep trying though.

You are so short sighted .

You don’t benefit from a healthy child being born ? You’d rather that kid be born with a permanent disability and be an expensive ward if of the state for 70 years ??

We don't benefit from anchor babies especially when the grow up and vote for commies like Pelosi.

You mean fellow Americans like the rest of us? Or are you Cherokee or somthing?

They are not fellow Americans. Both their parents are foreigners, they were here in the country illegally, and their citizenship is the result of scumbag judges interpreting the Constitution incorrectly.