When It Was Okay to Question a Person's Ethnicity

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,413
Reaction score
57,441
Points
2,290
You know, I know, Dems have done this countless times.

Heck, conservative blacks are attacked for not being "genuine". That's a longstanding leftoid whopper.

This too:


Screenshot+2024-08-03+at+11.12.37+AM.png
 
You know, I know, Dems have done this countless times.

Heck, conservative blacks are attacked for not being "genuine". That's a longstanding leftoid whopper.

This too:


Screenshot+2024-08-03+at+11.12.37+AM.png
in trumps case he was calling her out for first using asian and then changing it to black,,

only racists use race as a factor for anything,,
 
in trumps case he was calling her out for first using asian and then changing it to black,,

only racists use race as a factor for anything,,
So, saying the Kejanti Jackson is the first black Supreme Court justice .. or Sotomayor being the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice is racist? Are you reading IM2's book?
 
So, saying the Kejanti Jackson is the first black Supreme Court justice .. or Sotomayor being the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice is racist? Are you reading IM2's book?
only if it matters to you,,

it doesnt matter to me,,

all I care about is are they ruling on the side of the constitution or not,,

and IM2 is the biggest racist on this forum and I put him on ignore a week into my membership,,
 
only if it matters to you,,

it doesnt matter to me,,

all I care about is are they ruling on the side of the constitution or not,,

and IM2 is the biggest racist on this forum and I put him on ignore a week into my membership,,
I could care less .. it only becomes "racist" when it's a convenient out for democrats.
 
So, saying the Kejanti Jackson is the first black Supreme Court justice .. or Sotomayor being the first Hispanic Supreme Court justice is racist? Are you reading IM2's book?
Saying that is not racist, those are facts. However claiming that their ONLY qualifications for having obtained those positions is their race or gender or both is what is racist.
 
Saying that is not racist, those are facts. However claiming that their ONLY qualifications for having obtained those positions is their race or gender or both is what is racist.
If the only reason why they were selected is race or gender then it's not racist or sexist to say it.
 
IM2 is no racist. But seems that the racists have a problem with me. None of you want to take me on in a debate. But many of you want to talk about me behind my back. The progressive punk put me on ignore because he can't debate me. I will chew his racist ass up and spit him out like long cut chew. And what is this book I have supposedly written?

The OP is a bunch of bs. And it should be apparent to so called high IQ whites that black right wingers are questioned because they support policies that are anti black. The ONLY reason you losers defend them is because they are working to help you get the power to enact your anti black agenda.

They are called sellouts because they can be purchased to help white racists implement their anti black agenda for the right amount of money. They are essentially purchased. One example of this is Clarence Thomas who has recieved more than 4 milion dollars worth of gifts from white racists and he works to make certain their anti black agenda is enfoced by law. And of course you racists love him and think he's sucessful and intelligent because he is helping you return America to whites only.

Niike Haley is another example of a sellout. But as long as they help whites it's fine. They cannot be questioned for denying their heritage. Harris has NEVER done what Haley has. Haley has went so far as to not use here Indian name Nimrata and has gone by Nikki. As governor of South Carolina she ignored pleas from the black community to take down the confederate flag from the capital until 9 blacks were murdered in a church by a white boy.

Trump lied about Harris. She never claimed to be just asian and whites really need to stop this ----. Thisi 2024, and its time you sorry ass racists understand that we know what you'red oing. No amount of denial can hide what you are doing. No amount of plausible deniability fools us. You, especially the whites in ths thread, are just as racist as whites werein 1724, 1824, and 1924. And until you stop, you will be called out. So stop crying about being called the racists that you are.
 
Saying that is not racist, those are facts. However claiming that their ONLY qualifications for having obtained those positions is their race or gender or both is what is racist.



really? is it really racist when Democrats are known for pushing Identity politics? they celebrate having people in office that "Look LIKE".... fill in the blank. I call that being superficial. Pointing out politicians who play the game is not racist. There is no way you can point it out without mentioning race. DEmocrats talk about race all day long every day one way or another.

It would be racist if one was to say Kamala cannot do the job of President or Vice president because she is black or Indian. No one is saying her ethnicity makes her less of a person.. no one ever said that. The accusation, if you want to call it an accusation is that kamala identified as one race more than the other when it was personally expedient politically. Thats a Personal problem, not an issue of race.

Kamala had to drop out of the presidential primary race in 2020 because she was so unpopular. She was never voted in based on her ideas. She was selected by a running mate.
 
really? is it really racist when Democrats are known for pushing Identity politics? they celebrate having people in office that "Look LIKE".... fill in the blank. I call that being superficial. Pointing out politicians who play the game is not racist. There is no way you can point it out without mentioning race. DEmocrats talk about race all day long every day one way or another.

It would be racist if one was to say Kamala cannot do the job of President or Vice president because she is black or Indian. No one is saying her ethnicity makes her less of a person.. no one ever said that. The accusation, if you want to call it an accusation is that kamala identified as one race more than the other when it was personally expedient politically. Thats a Personal problem, not an issue of race.

Kamala had to drop out of the presidential primary race in 2020 because she was so unpopular. She was never voted in based on her ideas. She was selected by a running mate.
Why do you right wing rags lie about who is pushing identity politics? Your asses have been doing it since the motherfucking 1960's. This ain't 2020 and trump has NEVER got the most votes in an election.
 
Saying that is not racist, those are facts. However claiming that their ONLY qualifications for having obtained those positions is their race or gender or both is what is racist.
Kamala Harris was only hired because she was a black woman. That's just a fact. During his campaign, Biden committed to selecting a female vice president and was later pressured to choose a black female.
 
IM2 is no racist. But seems that the racists have a problem with me. None of you want to take me on in a debate. But many of you want to talk about me behind my back. The progressive punk put me on ignore because he can't debate me. I will chew his racist ass up and spit him out like long cut chew. And what is this book I have supposedly written?

The OP is a bunch of bs. And it should be apparent to so called high IQ whites that black right wingers are questioned because they support policies that are anti black. The ONLY reason you losers defend them is because they are working to help you get the power to enact your anti black agenda.

They are called sellouts because they can be purchased to help white racists implement their anti black agenda for the right amount of money. They are essentially purchased. One example of this is Clarence Thomas who has recieved more than 4 milion dollars worth of gifts from white racists and he works to make certain their anti black agenda is enfoced by law. And of course you racists love him and think he's sucessful and intelligent because he is helping you return America to whites only.

Niike Haley is another example of a sellout. But as long as they help whites it's fine. They cannot be questioned for denying their heritage. Harris has NEVER done what Haley has. Haley has went so far as to not use here Indian name Nimrata and has gone by Nikki. As governor of South Carolina she ignored pleas from the black community to take down the confederate flag from the capital until 9 blacks were murdered in a church by a white boy.

Trump lied about Harris. She never claimed to be just asian and whites really need to stop this ----. Thisi 2024, and its time you sorry ass racists understand that we know what you'red oing. No amount of denial can hide what you are doing. No amount of plausible deniability fools us. You, especially the whites in ths thread, are just as racist as whites werein 1724, 1824, and 1924. And until you stop, you will be called out. So stop crying about being called the racists that you are.
If you didn't vote for Biden, you're not black. Go ahead and continue to be used by the democrat party. You're a wated black man for not thinking on your own. Now run along and let the adults talk.
 
Why do you right wing rags lie about who is pushing identity politics? Your asses have been doing it since the motherfucking 1960's. This ain't 2020 and trump has NEVER got the most votes in an election.
Actually we want everyone to think for themselves. Remember if you didn't vote for Biden, you ain't black. Nothing better than to be told what to do, by your white leader. Right im2?
 
15th post
Why do you right wing rags lie about who is pushing identity politics? Your asses have been doing it since the motherfucking 1960's. This ain't 2020 and trump has NEVER got the most votes in an election.
You ain’t black
 
Saying that is not racist, those are facts. However claiming that their ONLY qualifications for having obtained those positions is their race or gender or both is what is racist.
If the only reason why they were selected is race or gender then it's not racist or sexist to say it.

Why is it so difficult for you to understand the difference between claiming "their ONLY qualification for having obtained those positions" and you alleging that "the ONLY reason they were selected is race or gender"? They're not the same thing.

If I'm a manager and I have a team that has no female or minority members and I decide that I want someone different than what we already have and always have had, that doesn't make me or my choice racist or sexist if I choose a woman or a Black person to supplement my team. But neither can be chosen/selected if they don't have the qualifications to allow them to hold the position <--- It's this last part that you all keep skipping & glossing over.
 
really? is it really racist when Democrats are known for pushing Identity politics? they celebrate having people in office that "Look LIKE".... fill in the blank. I call that being superficial. Pointing out politicians who play the game is not racist. There is no way you can point it out without mentioning race. DEmocrats talk about race all day long every day one way or another.

It would be racist if one was to say Kamala cannot do the job of President or Vice president because she is black or Indian. No one is saying her ethnicity makes her less of a person.. no one ever said that. The accusation, if you want to call it an accusation is that kamala identified as one race more than the other when it was personally expedient politically. Thats a Personal problem, not an issue of race.

Kamala had to drop out of the presidential primary race in 2020 because she was so unpopular. She was never voted in based on her ideas. She was selected by a running mate.
You know you sound like a parrot head when you start a discussion with "blah blah Democrats are known....blah blah blah.

I AM NOT A FRIGGEN Democrat so why are you bringing them up to ME?

And you are absolutely NOT telling the truth when you claim that "No one is saying her ethnicity makes her less of a person" because they have said that and more, specifically not just that she's a lesser person but "not as qualified" because of her gender and ethnicity. That's EXACTLY what they are saying when they refer to her as a DEI hire.

All I see you all doing is picking apart all of the reasons why you don't like VP Harris and all of the alleged reasons Trump is a better candidate than she.

You don't have to like her, you don't have to vote for her but at least be honest about the reasons WHY. None of you are currently the Vice President of the United States so talk as much trash as you want, she's still head and shoulders above the lot of you and I dare say obviously more qualified to the hold the position.
 
  • Brilliant
Reactions: IM2
Back
Top Bottom