Not after the threats they have made over the last 10 years, that they are now trying to claim that the remarks were taken out of context or where never said in the first place
Not after the threats they have made over the last 10 years, that they are now trying to claim that the remarks were taken out of context or where never said in the first place
The only reason you believe you never lose face is you are shameless (in fact, proud of your mindless hate) ... you lie continually and you just don't care who knows it.
Proof?
The US and others - including the UN - were convinced that Saddam had WMDs (not nukes) because he had used them on his own people and because he did not fully cooperate with UN inspectors.
Except Israel has never used WMDs and is not under any obligation to allow any inspectors as Iraq was. I realize you are aware of all this but continue to post your usual lies because that is all you have ... LIES. Face it, Princess ... despite your lame denials the only reason you post your drooling hate is to maintain your NAZI creds.
Sieg Heil.
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Last edited:
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
"ol Sniffer, the defender from all things Nazi that she sees everywhere but can't see the two feet in front of her nose that Israel is a fascist state while not as bad as Germany is in fact slowly grinding the Palestinian civilians into the earth one by one...
What a whacko!
Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!
Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
montelatici
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2014
- 18,686
- 2,127
- 280
If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!
Humanity
Gold Member
- Jul 17, 2014
- 5,089
- 361
- 130
Wow, work on that policy....
You are calling George W and Tony Blair RACIST LIARS!
Good call Phoney!
ForeverYoung436
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 6,050
- 1,228
- 245
He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!
Please name the eight Jewish Neo-Cons.
He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq! Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
"May of had them" you semiliterate slug. I thought you claimed to be college educated. Saddam had WMDs and used them against the Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Meanwhile theliq LIED about those inconvenient truths and you climbed right aboard his stupid train. Now you admit Saddam "may of had them?" I swear when you hateful idiots aren't being ignorant a-holes you are just plain stupid (and I mean that with all due respect).
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
H
They didn't have them at the time you and Israel were braying for the USA to invade Iraq, scum like you caused the death of 4,000 Americans soldiers over your lies via the PNAC Neo-Cons.He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq! Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
"May of had them" you semiliterate slug. I thought you claimed to be college educated. Saddam had WMDs and used them against the Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Meanwhile theliq LIED about those inconvenient truths and you climbed right aboard his stupid train. Now you admit Saddam "may of had them?" I swear when you hateful idiots aren't being ignorant a-holes you are just plain stupid (and I mean that with all due respect).
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!
Please name the eight Jewish Neo-Cons.
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] The PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership".[6] The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity".[7]
Of the twenty-five people who signed the PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11] Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.[12][13][14][15] Academics such as Inderjeet Parmar, Phillip Hammond, and Donald E. Abelson have said PNAC's influence on the George W. Bush administration has been exaggerated.[16][17][18]
The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006.[19]
Contents
[hide]
- 1Origins and operation
- 2Statement of Principles
- 3Calls for regime change in Iraq
- 4Rebuilding America's Defenses
- 5Critics
- 6End of the organization
- 7People associated with the PNAC
- 8See also
- 9Notes and references
- 10External links
Origins and operation[edit]
The Project for the New American Century developed from Kristol and Kagan's belief that the Republican Party lacked a "compelling vision for American foreign policy," which would allow Republican leaders to effectively criticize President Bill Clinton's foreign policy record.[19]
During the summer of 1996, Kristol and Kagan co-authored an article in Foreign Affairs titled "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy" - referring to the foreign policy of President Ronald Reagan. In the article, they argued that American conservatives were "adrift" in the area of foreign policy, advocated a "more elevated vision of America's international role," and suggested that the United States' should adopt a stance of "benevolent global hegemony."[20] In June 1997, Kristol and Kagan founded the PNAC in order to advance the goals they had first laid out in Foreign Affairs, echoing the article's statements and goals in PNAC's founding Statement of Principles.[19]
pbel
Gold Member
- Feb 26, 2012
- 5,653
- 449
- 130
Calls for regime change in Iraq[edit]He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!
Please name the eight Jewish Neo-Cons.
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] The PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership".[6] The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity".[7]
Of the twenty-five people who signed the PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11] Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.[12][13][14][15] Academics such as Inderjeet Parmar, Phillip Hammond, and Donald E. Abelson have said PNAC's influence on the George W. Bush administration has been exaggerated.[16][17][18]
The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006.[19]
Contents
[hide]
- 1Origins and operation
- 2Statement of Principles
- 3Calls for regime change in Iraq
- 4Rebuilding America's Defenses
- 5Critics
- 6End of the organization
- 7People associated with the PNAC
- 8See also
- 9Notes and references
- 10External links
Origins and operation[edit]
The Project for the New American Century developed from Kristol and Kagan's belief that the Republican Party lacked a "compelling vision for American foreign policy," which would allow Republican leaders to effectively criticize President Bill Clinton's foreign policy record.[19]
During the summer of 1996, Kristol and Kagan co-authored an article in Foreign Affairs titled "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy" - referring to the foreign policy of President Ronald Reagan. In the article, they argued that American conservatives were "adrift" in the area of foreign policy, advocated a "more elevated vision of America's international role," and suggested that the United States' should adopt a stance of "benevolent global hegemony."[20] In June 1997, Kristol and Kagan founded the PNAC in order to advance the goals they had first laid out in Foreign Affairs, echoing the article's statements and goals in PNAC's founding Statement of Principles.[19]
Kristol and Kagan advocated regime change in Iraq throughout the Iraq disarmament crisis.[22][23] Following perceived Iraqi unwillingness to co-operate with UN weapons inspections, core members of the PNAC including Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, R. James Woolsey, Elliot Abrams, Donald Rumsfeld, Robert Zoellick, and John Bolton were among the signatories of an open letter initiated by the PNAC to President Clinton calling for the removal of Saddam Hussein.[19][24] Portraying Saddam Hussein as a threat to the United States, its Middle East allies, and oil resources in the region, and emphasizing the potential danger of any Weapons of Mass Destruction under Iraq's control, the letter asserted that the United States could "no longer depend on our partners in the Gulf War to continue to uphold the sanctions or to punish Saddam when he blocks or evades UN inspections." Stating that American policy "cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council," the letter's signatories asserted that "the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf."[25] Believing that UN sanctions against Iraq would be an ineffective means of disarming Iraq, PNAC members also wrote a letter to Republican members of the U.S. Congress Newt Gingrich and Trent Lott,[26] urging Congress to act, and supported the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (H.R.4655)[27][28] which President Clinton signed into law in October 1998.
In February 1998, some of the same individuals who had signed the PNAC letter in January also signed a similar letter to Clinton, from the bipartisan Committee for Peace and Security in the Gulf.[24][29]
In January 1999, the PNAC circulated a memo that criticized the December 1998 bombing of Iraq in Operation Desert Fox as ineffective. The memo questioned the viability of Iraqi democratic opposition, which the U.S. was supporting through the Iraq Liberation Act, and referred to any "containment" policy as an illusion.[30]
Shortly after the September 11, 2001 attacks, the PNAC sent a letter to President George W. Bush, advocating "a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq", or regime change. The letter suggested that "any strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq," even if no evidence surfaced linking Iraq to the September 11 attacks. The letter warned that allowing Hussein to remain in power would be "an early and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international terrorism."[31] From 2001 through the invasion of Iraq, the PNAC and many of its members voiced active support for military action against Iraq, and asserted leaving Saddam Hussein in power would be "surrender to terrorism."[32][33][34][35][36]
RoccoR
Gold Member
pbel, et al,
There were many more Arab Palestinians leaders attracted to the post Weimar Republic style of German Leadership than than you might imagine. Many lasted into the 1948-49 War of Independence and carried forth the same agenda of anti-Semitism.
The impact of the marginal oppression experienced by the Arab Palestinian is a consequence of their anti-Semitism and the legacy passed-on by the Arab Palestinian leadership of the Ottoman and Post Weimar Republic. The inability of the Arab Palestinian to be prosperous and successful today is directly related to fallout and the obsession these leadership deficit of the Arab Palestinian experienced early on in the dispute and internal Arab Palestinian struggle for power and control it chased in the years leading up to Partition and beyond. The Arab Palestinian want to blame everything that has befallen them in the Jewish Immigrants (or as they say - Jewish Invaders or European Invaders) as if there was some grand conspiracy, on the part of all the Allied Powers, to single-out this tiny little piece of coastal territory (10,400 sq mi). Israel itself is about 8,000 sq mi (half of which is the Negev Desert). Palestine is about 2,317 sq mi, composed of the West Bank (2,178 sq mi) and the Gaza Strip (139 sq mi) (sizes vary depending on whether you count Jerusalem or not). The Negev Desert is real and extension of the Sinai Desert.
In 2003, it was estimated Israeli-Palestinian conflict—amounts to close to $3 trillion, measured in 2002 dollars (four times greater than the cost of the Vietnam war). Given that dollar figure, the US could have bought the entirety of the occupied Palestinian territories for just over (the outrageous price of) a billion dollars a square acre and still saved money. Then make whatever land reform we wanted, evict the Arab Palestinians all together or charge every one of them Park Avenue rent. The cost of war reparation and restitution was never an issue. The Arab Palestinians have lost more then they can ever recover. Since 2003, the US has probably spend close to another Trillion Dollars, and this doesn't count what funding the donor nations have invested. It is not about the money or the land. It is about the Arab Palestinian wanting to wage Jihad.
The question or implication as to the "fascist nature" of Israel is beyond most peoples understanding. Even academically (political scientists, historians, academicians) have trouble defining the true core fundamentals of fascism. Israel is not a country that is characterized as using of brutal intimidation of the domestic opposition by the militia, secret police, intelligence and security services. In the case of the Occupied Territories, nearly all belligerent populations complain about the restrictive nature of the occupation; particularly when the occupation is rife with hostile elements that are under a solemn promise to bring down the occupation and destroy the nation that occupied them. Israel is not a government that would be described as a despotic and totalitarian regime. It has more in common with a parliamentary democracy (similar to the Australia, Japan, Sweden, Netherlands, United Kingdom --- just to name a few).
The only people "slowly grinding the Palestinian civilians into the earth one by one" are the Arab Palestinians themselves; with the assistance of the Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians, Egyptians and Saudi Arabians --- as well as the remaining Palestinian Terrorists.
Most Respectfully,
R
There were many more Arab Palestinians leaders attracted to the post Weimar Republic style of German Leadership than than you might imagine. Many lasted into the 1948-49 War of Independence and carried forth the same agenda of anti-Semitism.
(COMMENT)
The impact of the marginal oppression experienced by the Arab Palestinian is a consequence of their anti-Semitism and the legacy passed-on by the Arab Palestinian leadership of the Ottoman and Post Weimar Republic. The inability of the Arab Palestinian to be prosperous and successful today is directly related to fallout and the obsession these leadership deficit of the Arab Palestinian experienced early on in the dispute and internal Arab Palestinian struggle for power and control it chased in the years leading up to Partition and beyond. The Arab Palestinian want to blame everything that has befallen them in the Jewish Immigrants (or as they say - Jewish Invaders or European Invaders) as if there was some grand conspiracy, on the part of all the Allied Powers, to single-out this tiny little piece of coastal territory (10,400 sq mi). Israel itself is about 8,000 sq mi (half of which is the Negev Desert). Palestine is about 2,317 sq mi, composed of the West Bank (2,178 sq mi) and the Gaza Strip (139 sq mi) (sizes vary depending on whether you count Jerusalem or not). The Negev Desert is real and extension of the Sinai Desert.
In 2003, it was estimated Israeli-Palestinian conflict—amounts to close to $3 trillion, measured in 2002 dollars (four times greater than the cost of the Vietnam war). Given that dollar figure, the US could have bought the entirety of the occupied Palestinian territories for just over (the outrageous price of) a billion dollars a square acre and still saved money. Then make whatever land reform we wanted, evict the Arab Palestinians all together or charge every one of them Park Avenue rent. The cost of war reparation and restitution was never an issue. The Arab Palestinians have lost more then they can ever recover. Since 2003, the US has probably spend close to another Trillion Dollars, and this doesn't count what funding the donor nations have invested. It is not about the money or the land. It is about the Arab Palestinian wanting to wage Jihad.
The question or implication as to the "fascist nature" of Israel is beyond most peoples understanding. Even academically (political scientists, historians, academicians) have trouble defining the true core fundamentals of fascism. Israel is not a country that is characterized as using of brutal intimidation of the domestic opposition by the militia, secret police, intelligence and security services. In the case of the Occupied Territories, nearly all belligerent populations complain about the restrictive nature of the occupation; particularly when the occupation is rife with hostile elements that are under a solemn promise to bring down the occupation and destroy the nation that occupied them. Israel is not a government that would be described as a despotic and totalitarian regime. It has more in common with a parliamentary democracy (similar to the Australia, Japan, Sweden, Netherlands, United Kingdom --- just to name a few).
The only people "slowly grinding the Palestinian civilians into the earth one by one" are the Arab Palestinians themselves; with the assistance of the Lebanese, Syrians, Jordanians, Egyptians and Saudi Arabians --- as well as the remaining Palestinian Terrorists.
Most Respectfully,
R
H
They didn't have them at the time you and Israel were braying for the USA to invade Iraq, scum like you caused the death of 4,000 Americans soldiers over your lies via the PNAC Neo-Cons.He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq! Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
"May of had them" you semiliterate slug. I thought you claimed to be college educated. Saddam had WMDs and used them against the Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Meanwhile theliq LIED about those inconvenient truths and you climbed right aboard his stupid train. Now you admit Saddam "may of had them?" I swear when you hateful idiots aren't being ignorant a-holes you are just plain stupid (and I mean that with all due respect).
Again you lie because that is all you ever seem able to do and like theliq, you seem to find no shame in it.
And yet you cant produce any evidence from a reliable non partisan source that supports your false claims can you. But you were never one to let such a little thing as the truth get in the way of your RACIST LIES.
No how about that link showing Israel to be fascists ?
Problems understanding English again as I never even hinted at that, why do you LIE so much about what other write when the truth is just one post back ?
He may of had them, senile witch, you and Israel were rooting to take out Saddam who did Not have them at the time that the eight Jewish Neo-Cons used their AIPAC influence invade Iraq!If any lies its probably you and your delusions 'ol Sniffer...Theliq tells the truth something ego-alien to you!Is that your lame attempt at defending theliq's lies? Just add some of your own? Typical.
Evidently you are incapable of following the discourse. Here's the latest, complete with exposure of theliq's latest LIES:
theliq said: ↑
YOU LIE AS USUAL,SADDAM HAD NO WEAPONS OMD...HEEL NOW YOU CURR
SAYIT said:
The irony is thick as it is you who repeatedly lies. Saddam not only had WMDs, he used them both against Iranians and Iraqi Kurds. Following 1990 Persian Gulf War the UN Security Council passed 2 resolutions - 687 & 699. Iraq accepted both and denied having a biological weapons program. Just 4 months later Iraq admitted to bio weapons research for "defensive purposes only" and those weapons have since been destroyed. Meanwhile as recently as 2010 Iraqi technicians were still busy dismantling the nuclear research centers Saddam claimed not to have. Radiation contamination is still evident. There must be some intelligent life in you but it has never been exposed here.
Assholes like you and Israel don't care about the American foot soldiers who died for a foreign cause... You only care about Israel, period!
Please name the eight Jewish Neo-Cons.
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was a neoconservative[1][2][3] think tank based in Washington, D.C. that focused on United States foreign policy. It was established as a non-profit educational organization in 1997, and founded by William Kristol and Robert Kagan.[4][5] The PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership".[6] The organization stated that "American leadership is good both for America and for the world," and sought to build support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity".[7]
Of the twenty-five people who signed the PNAC's founding statement of principles, ten went on to serve in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush, including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Paul Wolfowitz.[8][9][10][11] Observers such as Irwin Stelzer and Dave Grondin have suggested that the PNAC played a key role in shaping the foreign policy of the Bush Administration, particularly in building support for the Iraq War.[12][13][14][15] Academics such as Inderjeet Parmar, Phillip Hammond, and Donald E. Abelson have said PNAC's influence on the George W. Bush administration has been exaggerated.[16][17][18]
The Project for the New American Century ceased to function in 2006.[19]
Contents
[hide]
- 1Origins and operation
- 2Statement of Principles
- 3Calls for regime change in Iraq
- 4Rebuilding America's Defenses
- 5Critics
- 6End of the organization
- 7People associated with the PNAC
- 8See also
- 9Notes and references
- 10External links
Origins and operation[edit]
The Project for the New American Century developed from Kristol and Kagan's belief that the Republican Party lacked a "compelling vision for American foreign policy," which would allow Republican leaders to effectively criticize President Bill Clinton's foreign policy record.[19]
During the summer of 1996, Kristol and Kagan co-authored an article in Foreign Affairs titled "Toward a Neo-Reaganite Foreign Policy" - referring to the foreign policy of President Ronald Reagan. In the article, they argued that American conservatives were "adrift" in the area of foreign policy, advocated a "more elevated vision of America's international role," and suggested that the United States' should adopt a stance of "benevolent global hegemony."[20] In June 1997, Kristol and Kagan founded the PNAC in order to advance the goals they had first laid out in Foreign Affairs, echoing the article's statements and goals in PNAC's founding Statement of Principles.[19]
So where does it say they were Jews, or working for the Jews and caused the invasion or Iraq. I wonder which conspiracy theorist wrote this crap ?
Similar threads
