When did an “NDA” start being referred to as “HUSH MONEY”

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,555
52,727
3,615
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
That’s the tag the Media made up and they will permit no other manner of referencing
 
It is a contract through which the parties agree not to disclose any information covered by the agreement. An NDA creates a confidential relationship between the parties, typically to protect any type of confidential and proprietary information or trade secrets. As such, an NDA protects non-public business information. Like all contracts, they cannot be enforced if the contracted activities are illegal.
NDA
wiki
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
Would you rather call it a campaign finance violation?
 
“HUSH MONEY” is not a legal term.

NDA IS A LEGAL TERM. NON DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.

Why is it illegal to pay someone not to disclose personal data and sign an NDA?


Why are those referred to as NDAs and not “HUSH MONEY”?
When Democrats are manufacturing another bogus lawsuit to attack their political adversary. Hey that's what US justice is all about, right?
 
When employees of MSNBC or CNN are fired or quit, they OFTEN are compelled to sign NDAs in order to receive severance.

THIS IS HUSH MONEY. IT IS SO THE DISGRUNTLED EMPLOYEES DO NOT EMBARASS THE NETWORK.

You cult fucks all know this…you are disingenuous TDS psychos.

You know the media is using the term HUSH MONEY to make this seem more nefarious than it is.

IF YOU FRAUDS GAVE A SHIT ABOUT WOMEN, YOU WOULD SUPPORT JUANITA BRODERICK AND TARA READE.

You are lying frauds. You are nothing but Dem drones. Your brainwaves are DERP.
 
When Democrats are manufacturing another bogus lawsuit to attack their political adversary. Hey that's what US justice is all about, right?
I just read the woman overseeing Trump's finances found a $50 million discrepancy. Guess who will be investigating?
 

Forum List

Back
Top