So you don't think those in the Mideast should be upset or angry that their countries have been taken over and colonized by imperialists?
Taken over? The Middle East was freed from the Ottoman Empire overa century ago.
WTH are you whining about now?
They should not mind we massacred tens of thousands on the Highway of Death under a negotiated retreat?
Negotiated? Link?
They should not mind we took over half of Palestine and gave it to illegal European immigrants?
Well over half of Palastine was given to create Jordan. Your Arabic math is failing you.
There has never been any indication any Moslem, atheist or not, have ever wanted to kill anyone.
As long as you ignore all that they've killed.
Those killed by Moslems, seem to be to have been killed only as a very reluctant last resort, after tremendous abuses.
What were the abuses at the Boston Marathon, in San Bernadino or at the Pulse nightclub?
Wrong.
The forces that the British used to defeat the Ottoman Empire were Arab.
Remember Lawrence of Arabia?
The retreat of Iraqi forces were announced by the media before the massacre, so it is well established it was illegal murder by the US.
{...
The attacks became controversial to outsiders, with some commentators arguing that they represented disproportionate use of force, saying that the Iraqi forces were retreating from Kuwait in compliance with the original
UN Resolution 660 of August 2, 1990, and that the column included Kuwaiti
hostages[10] and civilian refugees. The refugees were reported to have included women and children family members of pro-Iraqi,
PLO-aligned Palestinian militants and Kuwaiti collaborators who had fled shortly before the returning Kuwaiti authorities pressured nearly 200,000 Palestinians to
leave Kuwait. Activist and former
United States Attorney General Ramsey Clark argued that these attacks violated the
Third Geneva Convention, Common Article 3, which outlaws the killing of soldiers who "are out of combat."
[11] Clark included it in his 1991 report
WAR CRIMES: A Report on United States War Crimes Against Iraq to the Commission of Inquiry for the International War Crimes Tribunal.
[12]
...}
en.wikipedia.org
You totally do not know anything about the history of Palestine.
Jordan was never part of Palestine.
Palestine was part of Trans Jordan and Jordan was part of Trans Jordan.
Palestine was always west of the Jordan River and Jordan east of the Jordan River.
But in 1920 as the Allies were trying to uphold their promises to liberate Trans Jordan, the natives forced them to divide Trans Jordan into Palestine, where Jewish immigration would be allowed, and Jordan, where no Jewish immigration would be allowed.
If you want to look it up, it is the Treaty of San Remo and the Treaty of Sevres.
And no, there are no Arab Moslem killings that were not essential, in defense, after all else had failed.
You can find aggression by Turks who were not really Moslem but just pretended to convert.
You can find aggression by Moors who were not really Moslem but just pretended to convert.
But not by actual Moslems, who would also have to be Arab to not just be pretending to convert.
The the abuses at the Boston Marathon, in San Bernadino or at the Pulse nightclub were stupid, but more than justified.
The Highway of Death alone was so incredibly evil that it justifies the total destruction of the entire US.
And we can't claim the innocense of civilians because we all know it happened and yet never ever tried to punish the guilty.
We are all complicit.
We paid for the weapons, and we did not properly supervise what the military did with them.
