What should Zelensky do next? Apologize......and make the deal to save his country.

and you're like the leftist inseminated person watching the same parade shouting 'look at my son' he looks good in that dress!
I don't have a son, but if I did, and he was more comfortable wearing a dress, I would still be proud of him.
 
Nah, he needs to look to the EU for all that promised help since he was told to get out of America and **** on off home.

Have you noticed the EU is falling all over themselves to kiss the midget's ass so they can show distain for Trump?

Good, this is the best possible outcome. Trump can simply say "great, the EU has this" and just walk away leaving the EU standing there with their dicks in their hands.

LOL....The squareheads better start wrenching on those broke-down Leopard II tanks of theirs. :laughing0301:
 
Let me ask you a question.
The Biden administration says they gave Ukraine a little over 170 billion dollars in help. Zelensky claims it is not even close to that amount. Now if Zelensky is lying and lining his pockets with the money at the expense of the Ukraine people should we not stop that? If the Biden administration was inflating the amount that was sent should we not stop whoever is lining their pockets over here at the expense of the Ukrainian people before we send more?
Or do we not care that much about the Ukrainian people and just care about looks?
We shouldn't change anything just because someone made an accusation.
 
Nah, he needs to look to the EU for all that promised help since he was told to get out of America and **** on off home.

Have you noticed the EU is falling all over themselves to kiss the midget's ass so they can show distain for Trump?

Good, this is the best possible outcome. Trump can simply say "great, the EU has this" and just walk away leaving the EU standing there with their dicks in their hands.

LOL....The squareheads better start wrenching on those broke-down Leopard II tanks of theirs. :laughing0301:
World leaders showing distain for trump is nothing new. Trump failed to fit in with the rich, the high class (Kennedy Center crowd), and now the world leaders. Trump doesn't fit in with anybody but his cult.
 
World leaders showing distain for trump is nothing new. Trump failed to fit in with the rich, the high class (Kennedy Center crowd), and now the world leaders. Trump doesn't fit in with anybody but his cult.
You mean those millions of Americans that elected him?

Damn, that's one hell of a "cult". :laughing0301:

Please dems....never change.....Oh and make sure you use Nazi a lot more to describe Trump voters.....That will go over well in the mid-terms.
 
You mean those millions of Americans that elected him?

Damn, that's one hell of a "cult". :laughing0301:

Please dems....never change.....Oh and make sure you use Nazi a lot more to describe Trump voters.....That will go over well in the mid-terms.
You seem to think trump's 1.5% win was historical. In a sense it was. 1.5% is one of the smallest amounts for any president to have won an election.
 
If Russia or China attacked a nation in our hemisphere like Canada or Mexico we would come to their defense... so the EU and the UK should defend Ukraine... they have the means to do so... we are done... its their turn.... we have our own problems to fix....
 
You seem to think trump's 1.5% win was historical. In a sense it was. 1.5% is one of the smallest amounts for any president to have won an election.
 
World leaders showing distain for trump is nothing new. Trump failed to fit in with the rich, the high class (Kennedy Center crowd), and now the world leaders. Trump doesn't fit in with anybody but his cult.
 
spin baby spin. 1.5% is tiny by anyone's reconning.
 
That's stupid. Nuclear weapons proliferation is a world problem. We should honor our treaty.
Honor our treaty when others are not?... that's suicide....
 
He's right. Russia never would have attacked Ukraine if they still had their weapons.
Those were not "their weapons". Those were Soviet weapons. They always were controlled by Moscow, not by Kiev. And if they didn't agree to return them in Russia, Moscow wouldn't have another option but to start SMO in 1992.
 
15th post
Those were not "their weapons". Those were Soviet weapons. They always were controlled by Moscow, not by Kiev. And if they didn't agree to return them in Russia, Moscow wouldn't have another option but to start SMO in 1992.
They were IN Ukraine. If they weren't under Ukrainian control, there would be no reason for a treaty.
 
They were IN Ukraine. If they weren't under Ukrainian control, there would be no reason for a treaty.
And there are US ICBMs in Wyoming, but it doesn't mean that official Cheyenne control them. May be, in the case of peaceful secession of Wyoming, Washington will be ready to sign some meaningless papers for peaceful removal of those silos, but it doesn't mean that Cheyenne can really blackmail Washington with them, even less - that American people might allow Cheyenne people (however independent) to commit raids against White American towns in now-independent Wyoming.
 
Last edited:
We shouldn't change anything just because someone made an accusation.
Well you see here is the big difference between you and me. I am not a big fan of people dying in war. I am even less of a fan of those making a profit off building the means to kill others in war. But I especially hate anyone that would line their pockets with aid that was meant to help a country and its people. It seems as if you like all those things.
The Biden administration did not just make an accusation they publicly stated that they gave Ukraine that money.
Zelensky says that Ukraine never got that much. It was not an accusation it was stated as fact. But you really do not care who is making a profit. You do not care how many people die. You only care about how the democrat cult can make the republican cult look bad.
 
Back
Top Bottom