Mac1958
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #121
Yeah, it seems to me that this is the most binary of the issues. The procedure is either done or it isn't. Not a lot of wiggle room.I've never believed that the death penalty should be a deterrent. It should be, and should always have been, a punishment. Nothing more, nothing less.
The issue I struggle with the most is abortion.
Personally, I find it to be an abhorrent practice. I wish it wasn't a thing. I wish there wasn't a reason for it. I wish women would want to get pregnant, get pregnant, and nine months later give birth to a wondrous bundle of joy.
If my daughter were to become pregnant (which she cannot) and sought my advice, I would advise her to not terminate her pregnancy.
That said, I am vehemently against the government, state or federal, deciding whether or not it should be available to a woman who, for whatever reason, wants to have one. That should be between the woman, her doctor and whoever her God is.
You will never legislate abortion out of existence. A woman who wants one will get one, whether it's legal or not. For that reason, as I see it, safe abortion services should always be available...
I agree with your points on both ends of this, and it seems to me that the closest we can come to some compromise is a limit on the gestation period. I'm no fan of Lindsey Graham, but I do agree with his suggestion. The pro life side would be making the bigger compromise in this particular case, since most abortions take place within 15 weeks anyway.
There are no perfect 50/50 compromises, though. We all can get our way a little more on one issue, a little less on the next.