getting charts together and finding out if they are the same charts you rely on
That is a strategy of collecting "charts" that you did not prepare and do not understand how they were made. Take, for example, the issue of the atmosphere. The Co2 FRAUD claims Co2 is "warming" the atmosphere. They have fudge charts for idiots to cut and paste. But, in reality, we have TWO AND ONLY TWO MEASURES of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons, which returned highly correlated data.
What was that data? ... and remember this is NBC spinning it for the Co2 FRAUD side....
Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.
www.nbcnews.com
"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling"
Gotta love that spin. "Suggested" Your outside thermometer "suggested" 85F today, but that was just a "suggestion," and after a conflicted taxpayer funded fudgebaking liar got through with it, the temperature reads 95F....
In reality, what the article calls "cooling" was really a flat line with modest up and down variance. Both satellites and balloons, for example showed a cooler than normal atmosphere in 1998, the first Bill Clinton "warmest year ever" claim....
What the warmers used to fudge the data is the most pathetic idiotic dishonest BS.
Satellites - "orbit wobble" was the claim, IR satellite data would not have changed at all
Balloons - "shade issues" that were constant the whole time. OK, so the "correction" would be a one time constant adjustment for all data, but somehow that changed a FLAT LINE into an UPWARD SLOPE....
The idiocy of the fraud
What is the evidence the atmosphere is "warming?" FUDGE
Is there ANY EVIDENCE that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric "warming?" NO