What Is Space Actually On?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

A hypothesis is simply putting the cart before the horse.

That's very silly and false. You say some very bizarre and false things about science.

 

[Woodznutz]

Ah yes, the loaded statement.

Of course, this "complexity" is undefined. In reality, a swinning pool full of hydrocarbons is more complex than a human being. A volcano is more complex than a human being. Both contain more information than a 200 pound human.

Design suggests organized and purposeful complexity.

I believe living organisms are the most complex things that exist.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Design suggests organized and purposeful complexity. I believe living organisms are the most complex things that exist.

Oh, so you're just making a basic and egregious error in logic.

Please go look up "Inverse Error". It can help you avoid this very elementary mistake in the future.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I believe living organisms are the most complex things that exist.

Then you're wrong. I have already shown why that is. Many things contain more information than a bacterium or an ape.

 

[Woodznutz]

That's right. And that's why we perform science.

That's why you have zero published science to cite, and I have...

Checks notes

...all of it.

Unfortunately, what you know is more important to mankind than what I know. So, you've got me there.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Unfortunately, what you know is more important to mankind than what I know. So, you've got me there.

Is that supposed to be an excuse for why you have no science to cite? Just a big conspiracy?

 

[Woodznutz]

Oh, so you're just making a basic and egregious error in logic.

Please go look up "Inverse Error". It can help you avoid this very elementary mistake in the future.

Volcanoes can be explained. Life cannot be.

 

[ReinyDays]

I meant complex living organisms, like us.

What does "us" or "living organism" have to do with atoms obeying the Laws of Physics? ...

This is a run-around ... isn't it ... full circle ... back to evolution ... there's no physical evidence of intelligent design, not one shred ...

Christ commands us to be peacemakers, why do you monger war? ...

 

[Woodznutz]

Is that supposed to be an excuse for why you have no science to cite? Just a big conspiracy?

What I know is very scientific, but it is rejected by most of mankind, even scientists.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Volcanoes can be explained. Life cannot be.

Yes it can.

Well that was easy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What I know is very scientific, but it is rejected by most of mankind, even scientists.

It clearly is not, since you cannot produce a shred of evidence or a scientific test of it.

You keep saying false things.

 

[Woodznutz]

What does "us" or "living organism" have to do with atoms obeying the Laws of Physics? ...

This is a run-around ... isn't it ... full circle ... back to evolution ... there's no physical evidence of intelligent design, not one shred ...

Christ commands us to be peacemakers, why do you monger war? ...

Actually, I relate everything to the ToE argument. Evolution requires some pretty complex changes at the atomic level.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

No. A hypothesis is a statement.

The question comes before. And several hypotheses may be proposed to answer that question.

No
Like I said, a hypothesis can't exist without a question to provide a hypothesis to.
Again... funny

 

[Woodznutz]

Yes it can.

Well that was easy.

You can't explain life, no one can.

 

[noonereal]

What is Space actually Made On?
I do not mean the atoms, energy, mass, baryonic matter, planets, dust, moons, or plasma that make up the Universe?
I mean what is holding these physical structures of mass.
I am specifically talking about what the matter is in or on.
Like if you see a painting or drawing. You look at what the drawing is of.
But what is the ink or paint on? What is the canvas made of?
The question we need to ask ourselves is what are we as mass, such as the planets, and the vacuum of space on?
For instance we are 1 astronomical unit from the Sun.
We are 150 million kilometres from the Sun.
And some would say there is nothing between the Earth and the Sun. Just a near perfect vacuum, with virtually nothing between us.
But that is not what I am asking. I am asking what is holding that vacuum. On another level what is the vacuum of 150 million miles on.
You cannot have 150 million miles of nothing. I know you will say it is a vacuum. But what is that vacuum on.
I mean if you had a mile of space on Earth. Yes it might be containing matter, such as oxygen, rocks, oceans, clouds, humans, animals, and plants. But if you had a mile of outer space. There might be a near perfect vacuum. But it is still 1 mile of space. The same distance both times.
So the thing is. Surely the 1 mile of near perfect space and 1 mile of Earth, are the same distance. So what is holding that 1 miles of space whether it be a near perfect vacuum or as on Earth containing huge amounts of matter.
The actual structure that holds 1 mile of vacuum space and 1 mile of matter, must be the same thing,
So what is that is holding the 1 mile of space and 1 mile of Earth matter.
I know the Universe contains mass, energy, matter. But what is it on?
This is a vital philosophical and scientific question.
1 mile of mass and 1 mile of space vacuum, are both the same distance. What are they both on?
It is as if we are people painted on a canvas that tells a story or landscape. On one level you can as an art critic try to explain the story that the painting is telling. But to make that work of art you must know what we are made. Are we paint, or are we layers of different paint on a canvas? And what is that canvas made of? A canvas with no paint on it, is the same distance as a canvas with a beautiful landscape or mythical scene.
What is Space on?

my guess, drugs

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolution requires some pretty complex changes at the atomic level.

It requires zero changes at the atomic level.

Zero.

I think you mean, "molecular level". Which would just be a chemical reaction. As mundane as it gets.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can't explain life, no one can.

Sure I can. Anyone who bothers to learn about it can.

If you reject or don't understand the explanation, that's on you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Like I said, a hypothesis can't exist without a question to provide a hypothesis to.

Which does not mean questions are science. For reasons already clearly stated. Sorry. You said something silly and false, time to move on...

 

[noonereal]

You can't explain life, no one can.

Life is nothing but a definition we assign to ourselves and similar entities.

 

[Woodznutz]

It clearly is not, since you cannot produce a shred of evidence or a scientific test of it.

You keep saying false things.

What I know is of no value to anyone even though it's scientifically accurate and critically important.