What Have We Done that People Like You Want to Make Us Extinct?

[JoeB131]

It is not eradicating a disease. It doesn’t prevent it’s reoccurrence. It just kills those who
are have it before they are born.

again, only if you accept fetuses are people, which they aren't. Let's move on and see if you can come up with an even sillier argument.

It could be used for other undesirables, such as blacks. If any fetus is black then they get aborted. How dare we used science to eradicate an undesirable race!

Well, you see, that would require black women to see being black as being undesirable. That would require Mia Love levels of Self-loathing.

Most people see Down's Syndrome as undesirable.

 

[JoeB131]

Nazis are socialists....lefties. If you think Hitler believed in individual rights over government control, you're the ignorant one here.

The issue wasn't about "individual rights". The Right doesn't believe in that when it comes to birth control or gay marriage. When a wingnut talks about "individual rights", it's usually about the ability of people with money and power to abuse people without money and power.

Which is why the big industrialists in Germany just loved, loved, loved Hitler... until the Allies bombed the shit out of their factories, anyway.

 

[JoeB131]

Wow, just fricken WOW. I can not believe just how closed minded and ignorant some people are to support such evil......and still think of themselves as tolerant of others.

Yeah, I mean I know. Those intolerant people who got rid of Polio, weren't they considering the feelings of people who already had it?

 

[AvgGuyIA]

"We commit no crimes."

"What have we done that people like you want to make us disappear?"

See Down-syndrome girl shred U.N. ‘expert’


.

yes, how dare we use science to eradicate a horrible disease.

It is not eradicating a disease. It doesn’t prevent it’s reoccurrence. It just kills those who
are have it before they are born.

It could be used for other undesirables, such as blacks. If any fetus is black then they get aborted. How dare we used science to eradicate an undesirable race!


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

That's the philosophy of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

These liberal European reveal their nazi roots.

Few ignorant Alt-Rights still claim Nazis were Liberal.

Alt-right - Wikipedia
White supremacist[1] Richard Spencer initially promoted the term in 2010 in reference to a movement centered on white nationalism and did so, according to the Associated Press, to disguise overt racism, white supremacism, neo-fascism and neo-Nazism.[2][3][4] The term drew considerable media attention and controversy during and after the 2016 United States presidential election.[5]

Alt-Right Richard Spenser is pro Palestinian, just like the liberals undeniably here in America do. Imagine that. Guess who conservatives support?

He said it in a speech on YouTube. I doubt you would want to watch that. If you don't believe me, ask some of his supporte s here if they support the Palestinians over the Jews.

 

[Votto]

Secular humanists think that all of humanity is a virus.

This is mind numbingly stupid.

Could you be a little bit more specific?

Nope. No need. Such idiotic declarations presented without evidence can also be discarded without evidence.

IF there is no God then man just ended up the top of the food chain and is nothing more than a glorified ape.

And what do we do to animals? We put them in zoos, keep them as pets, use them as beasts of burden, or kill and eat them.

Your only position is to justify treating humans the same or take the road PETA does and treat animals like people. Either approach is unacceptable in my book.

Not true, you can acknowledge differences like degree of sentience, for instance.

I would say that most secular humanists would point to human intelligence as being the difference between ape and man.

If so, what should be done with humans who have the intelligence of an ape?

This is why they want to kill those with Downs.

 

[Skull Pilot]

This is mind numbingly stupid.

Could you be a little bit more specific?

Nope. No need. Such idiotic declarations presented without evidence can also be discarded without evidence.

IF there is no God then man just ended up the top of the food chain and is nothing more than a glorified ape.

And what do we do to animals? We put them in zoos, keep them as pets, use them as beasts of burden, or kill and eat them.

Your only position is to justify treating humans the same or take the road PETA does and treat animals like people. Either approach is unacceptable in my book.

Not true, you can acknowledge differences like degree of sentience, for instance.

I would say that most secular humanists would point to human intelligence as being the difference between ape and man.

If so, what should be done with humans who have the intelligence of an ape?

This is why they want to kill those with Downs.

Who wants to kill living people who have Downs?

I see nothing wrong with genetic testing of fetuses or with terminating the pregnancy of a child who will have deformities or be mentally retarded

 

[JoeB131]

That's the philosophy of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood.

Lie. Quotes attributed to Sanger are mostly fakes or taken out of context.

Why do you guys keep pretending that women controlling their own bodies is some kind of scheme to create a master race.

If a woman thinks she's not ready to be a mother, she probably has a damned good reason.

 

[Votto]

Could you be a little bit more specific?

Nope. No need. Such idiotic declarations presented without evidence can also be discarded without evidence.

IF there is no God then man just ended up the top of the food chain and is nothing more than a glorified ape.

And what do we do to animals? We put them in zoos, keep them as pets, use them as beasts of burden, or kill and eat them.

Your only position is to justify treating humans the same or take the road PETA does and treat animals like people. Either approach is unacceptable in my book.

Not true, you can acknowledge differences like degree of sentience, for instance.

I would say that most secular humanists would point to human intelligence as being the difference between ape and man.

If so, what should be done with humans who have the intelligence of an ape?

This is why they want to kill those with Downs.

Who wants to kill living people who have Downs?

I see nothing wrong with genetic testing of fetuses or with terminating the pregnancy of a child who will have deformities or be mentally retarded

Did you not read the article from the UN?

I've heard Fabian socialists suggest the same sort of thing.

 

[Votto]

That's the philosophy of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood.

Lie. Quotes attributed to Sanger are mostly fakes or taken out of context.

Why do you guys keep pretending that women controlling their own bodies is some kind of scheme to create a master race.

If a woman thinks she's not ready to be a mother, she probably has a damned good reason.

Fake and out of context?

Sanger was a eugenicist and a racist. How can we be certain of this? It is not only from quotes from her, which are easy to research, but also the entire scientific community during her time were also into that sort of thing.

What would be extraordinary would be to find a scientist who was not into eugenics and a racist to boot. Even Darwin suffered from such thinking which later led to Hitler who thanked much of the scientists in the US for doing his research for him.

 

[JoeB131]

Fake and out of context?

Sanger was a eugenicist and a racist. How can we be certain of this? It is not only from quotes from her, which are easy to research, but also the entire scientific community during her time were also into that sort of thing.

except those quotes are either fakes, or taken out of context.

How False Narratives of Margaret Sanger Are Being Used to Shame Black Women - Rewire

Sanger was pro-birth control and anti-abortion. This may surprise you, considering that Planned Parenthood opponents frequently accuse Sanger of erecting abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, a practice they claim the organization continues to this day.

But this is simply not true.

Sanger opposed abortion. She believed it to be a barbaric practice. In her own words, “[a]lthough abortion may be resorted to in order to save the life of the mother, the practice of it merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.” Her views are, ironically, in keeping with the views of many of the anti-choicers who malign and distort her legacy.

In her seminal book Killing the Black Body, Dorothy Roberts points out that leaders in the Black community actually welcomed Sanger’s birth control agenda in the 1930s, and even criticized it for not going far enough to serve Black people.

W. E. B. Du Bois, who was one of the first Black leaders to publicly support birth control and who worked closely with Sanger to advocate for it, even serving on the board of a clinic that Sanger opened up in Harlem, criticized the wider birth control movement because of its failure to address Black people’s needs as well.

It was this failure that gave birth to the sinister-sounding Negro Project.

Due to segregation policies in the South, the birth control clinics that opened in the 1930s were for white women only. Sanger wanted to change that. She sought to open clinics in the South staffed by Black doctors and nurses, and to educate Black women about contraception. In 1939, after she had been named honorary chairman of the board of Birth Control Federation of America (the precursor to Planned Parenthood), Sanger launched the Negro Project. The Federation’s Division of Negro Services, a national advisory council, which included prominent Black leaders like Du Bois, Mary McLeod Bethune, E. Franklin Frazier, Walter White, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, worked to manage the Negro Project.

 

[JoeB131]

What would be extraordinary would be to find a scientist who was not into eugenics and a racist to boot. Even Darwin suffered from such thinking which later led to Hitler who thanked much of the scientists in the US for doing his research for him.

Okay, I guess that would be accurate.. but probably equally accurate to say, "Any White Person living in the 19th or early 20th Century was a racist", because mostly, they were.

 

[JimBowie1958]

These liberal European reveal their nazi roots.

Few ignorant Alt-Rights still claim Nazis were Liberal.

Alt-right - Wikipedia
White supremacist[1] Richard Spencer initially promoted the term in 2010 in reference to a movement centered on white nationalism and did so, according to the Associated Press, to disguise overt racism, white supremacism, neo-fascism and neo-Nazism.[2][3][4] The term drew considerable media attention and controversy during and after the 2016 United States presidential election.[5]

No one says the Nazis were liberals, not that have a brain anyway, what is said is that they were SOCIALISTS and LEFTWING, none of which = 'liberal'.

Hell, todays liberals arent really liberals anyway, they are government worshiping thugs.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Just think, someday we may be able to prevent gays and transexuals by aborting them all so they are never born! No more LBGT!

Sure, better to talk about than LBGT than about social unjustice in America and war crimes cryptoneozionists have been comitting all over the world!

You dont know what the hell you are talking about.

There is a huge difference between murdering tens of millions of YOUR OWN PEOPLE UNDER YOUR OWN RULE vrs collateral damage from bombing DURING A WAR, stupid shit4brains.

There is ZERO comparability between the people who died from bombing of Dresden vrs the tens of millions of civilians slaughtered by Hitler and Stalin.

If you had a single functioning brain cell you would be able to realize that fact.

 

[JimBowie1958]

The secular humanists need to show leadership and kill themselves first.

Lead from the front by example is what the best leaders always do.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

Could you be a little bit more specific?

Nope. No need. Such idiotic declarations presented without evidence can also be discarded without evidence.

IF there is no God then man just ended up the top of the food chain and is nothing more than a glorified ape.

And what do we do to animals? We put them in zoos, keep them as pets, use them as beasts of burden, or kill and eat them.

Your only position is to justify treating humans the same or take the road PETA does and treat animals like people. Either approach is unacceptable in my book.

Not true, you can acknowledge differences like degree of sentience, for instance.

I would say that most secular humanists would point to human intelligence as being the difference between ape and man.

If so, what should be done with humans who have the intelligence of an ape?

This is why they want to kill those with Downs.

Who wants to kill living people who have Downs?

I see nothing wrong with genetic testing of fetuses or with terminating the pregnancy of a child who will have deformities or be mentally retarded

Hitlerian solution for Downs. Shame on you pig.

 

[Votto]

Fake and out of context?

Sanger was a eugenicist and a racist. How can we be certain of this? It is not only from quotes from her, which are easy to research, but also the entire scientific community during her time were also into that sort of thing.

except those quotes are either fakes, or taken out of context.

How False Narratives of Margaret Sanger Are Being Used to Shame Black Women - Rewire

Sanger was pro-birth control and anti-abortion. This may surprise you, considering that Planned Parenthood opponents frequently accuse Sanger of erecting abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, a practice they claim the organization continues to this day.

But this is simply not true.

Sanger opposed abortion. She believed it to be a barbaric practice. In her own words, “[a]lthough abortion may be resorted to in order to save the life of the mother, the practice of it merely for limitation of offspring is dangerous and vicious.” Her views are, ironically, in keeping with the views of many of the anti-choicers who malign and distort her legacy.

In her seminal book Killing the Black Body, Dorothy Roberts points out that leaders in the Black community actually welcomed Sanger’s birth control agenda in the 1930s, and even criticized it for not going far enough to serve Black people.

W. E. B. Du Bois, who was one of the first Black leaders to publicly support birth control and who worked closely with Sanger to advocate for it, even serving on the board of a clinic that Sanger opened up in Harlem, criticized the wider birth control movement because of its failure to address Black people’s needs as well.

It was this failure that gave birth to the sinister-sounding Negro Project.

Due to segregation policies in the South, the birth control clinics that opened in the 1930s were for white women only. Sanger wanted to change that. She sought to open clinics in the South staffed by Black doctors and nurses, and to educate Black women about contraception. In 1939, after she had been named honorary chairman of the board of Birth Control Federation of America (the precursor to Planned Parenthood), Sanger launched the Negro Project. The Federation’s Division of Negro Services, a national advisory council, which included prominent Black leaders like Du Bois, Mary McLeod Bethune, E. Franklin Frazier, Walter White, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, worked to manage the Negro Project.

So she hated abortion? Well that's interesting, but the fact remains that she was into eugenics and wanted those of color to not have offspring.

Funny, the woman who started PP thought abortion was a crime against humanity.

Hilarious!

 

[Carl in Michigan]

So she hated abortion? Well that's interesting, but the fact remains that she was into eugenics and wanted those of color to not have offspring.

Funny, the woman who started PP thought abortion was a crime against humanity.

Hilarious!

Not true. Liberals LIE.

 

[JoeB131]

So she hated abortion? Well that's interesting, but the fact remains that she was into eugenics and wanted those of color to not have offspring.

No, that wasn't true at all... learn to fucking read, you fucking moron. Blacks begged her to set up BC clinics, because up to that point, only white people could get birth control.

Funny, the woman who started PP thought abortion was a crime against humanity.

Hilarious!

Not really. 1920's abortion was still a pretty dangerous procedure before antibiotics and specialized equipment.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Nope. No need. Such idiotic declarations presented without evidence can also be discarded without evidence.

IF there is no God then man just ended up the top of the food chain and is nothing more than a glorified ape.

And what do we do to animals? We put them in zoos, keep them as pets, use them as beasts of burden, or kill and eat them.

Your only position is to justify treating humans the same or take the road PETA does and treat animals like people. Either approach is unacceptable in my book.

Not true, you can acknowledge differences like degree of sentience, for instance.

I would say that most secular humanists would point to human intelligence as being the difference between ape and man.

If so, what should be done with humans who have the intelligence of an ape?

This is why they want to kill those with Downs.

Who wants to kill living people who have Downs?

I see nothing wrong with genetic testing of fetuses or with terminating the pregnancy of a child who will have deformities or be mentally retarded

Did you not read the article from the UN?

I've heard Fabian socialists suggest the same sort of thing.

I don't have to read it.

There is no reason not to have a fetus genetically tested and if you want t retarded or deformed child then you can choose to keep it or not.