noetic.org
No need. The burden of proof for such a claim lies with those making it. And I have heard such falsehoods before.Xenoglossy – IONS
Could xenoglossy be evidence for survival of consciousness? Or are there alternative explanations for the phenomenon not involving the paranormal?
Perhaps you should read the article.
Wayyyyyy easy question.
That's right. And that's why, in a modern, secular society, we go to such lengths to maintain a basic quality of life.
Your proof is exactly what you claim theirs to be...NON-EXISTENT.
Huh?
Logical? Purpose? If the purpose is to replicate, than life has little meaning in the sense people construct.
"...If humanism were right in declaring that man is born only to be happy, he would not be born to die. Since his body is doomed to die, his task on earth evidently must be of a more spiritual nature. It cannot be unrestrained enjoyment of everyday life. It cannot be the search for the best ways to obtain material goods and then cheerfully get the most of them. It has to be the fulfillment of a permanent, earnest duty so that one's life journey may become an experience of moral growth, so that one may leave life a better human being than one started it..."
Nonsense posing as intellectual discourse.
Is it? The physical world can only be made manifest by mind and is entirely abstract and without ‘actuality’ apart from its linkage to consciousness.
This is a life breeding, intelligence creating universe because the constant presence of mind made it so. The linkage between mind and matter isn't a new concept. It is primarily physicists who have expressed the relationship between mind and matter, and the primacy of mind; Arthur Eddington, Von Weizsacker, Wolfgang Pauli and George Wald, all contemplated it.
What do you think Arthur Eddington was trying to say when in 1928 he wrote, “the stuff of the world is mind‑stuff... The mind‑stuff is not spread in space and time."
Physicists live with the problem of consciousness day in and day out. Early in this century it became evident to all physicists that the observer is an intrinsic component of every physical observation. Physical reality is what physicists recognize to be real. One cannot separate the recognition of existence from existence. As Erwin Schrödinger put it: “The world is a construct of our sensations, perceptions, memories. It is convenient to regard it as existing objectively on its own. But it certainly does not become manifest by its mere existence.”
What do you believe Von Weizsacker meant when he said, "Consciousness and matter are different aspects of the same reality.”
What do you think Wolfgang Pauli meant when he said, “To us . . . the only acceptable point of view appears to be the one that recognizes both sides of reality -- the quantitative and the qualitative, the physical and the psychical -- as compatible with each other, and can embrace them simultaneously . . . It would be most satisfactory of all if physis and psyche (i.e., matter and mind) could be seen as complementary aspects of the same reality.”
greetings
